Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorists Attack and the Media Distorts
Camera ^ | March 14, 2002 | Camera

Posted on 03/15/2002 12:02:15 AM PST by Nix 2

Terrorists Attack and the Media Distorts

March 14, 2002

Israelis are being subjected to a soul-searing onslaught of terrorist attacks (see list of attacks at bottom) in their homes, cafes, pizzerias, markets, wedding halls, cars, highways and border checkpoints. Yet many in the media have been minimizing attention on the brutal Palestinian terrorism while emphasizing the focus on Israel's military response.

Often articles will include emotional quotations from Palestinians about how they felt during a military attack on a nearby building, while rarely are Israelis asked to describe their feelings about witnessing or being subjected to a terrorist attack. Often, more attention is paid to the bombing of empty Palestinian Authority police buildings, which resulted in no deaths, than to terrorist attacks which resulted in numerous deaths of Israeli civilians.

A frequent distortion seen in reports of the conflict is the tally of the dead. For example, in a Reuters report ("Europe and U.S. Press Sharon to Halt Military Action as 3 Are Killed) that appeared in the March 10 New York Times, the last paragraph states, "At least 1012 Palestinians and 319 Israelis have been killed since the Palestinian uprising began after peace talks stalled." It would be much more fair to write: "More than 319 Israelis have been killed – most of them civilians targeted by Palestinian terrorists – while more than 1012 Palestinians have been killed, usually while engaged in violent attacks against Israelis."

Reporters rarely make clear that most of the Israeli victims have been civilians killed in terrorist attacks, while most of the Palestinian dead have been killed as a result of their participation in violence against Israel.

This is an important distinction that needs to be stressed. Surely no respected reporter would make a moral equivalence between the US's justified military response to Al Qaeda, and Al Qaeda's barbaric 9/11 attacks against the US. Since this is the case, it is certainly a double standard for the press to portray Israel's fight against terrorism as an unjustified overreaction.

It is also offensive for reporters to glorify terrorists with photos and sympathetic human interest stories about their lives and families (e.g. "Portrait of an Angry Young Arab Woman" by New York Times' Joel Greenberg, March 1, 2002), especially when so few human interest stories are done about the Israeli victims!

At times the media completely omits mention of Israeli victims! For example, in a March 10 New York Times graphic ("One Week: A Grim Toll in the Mideast"), the horrifying Palestinian terrorist attack in Beit Yisrael, which killed 10 people including 6 children, was described this way: "Saturday, March 2: A Palestinian suicide bomber blew himself up in an Orthodox neighborhood in Jerusalem." The New York Times didn't find it newsworthy to mention that 10 Jews were murdered, leaving the impression the death of the bomber was the total extent of that day's "grim toll." [Please note, the New York Times did report on this attack elsewhere, but in this particular graphic, which was supposed to focus on the number killed – the Israeli deaths were omitted.]

On March 5, there were four separate terrorist attacks against Israelis resulting in 5 deaths, yet the Times graphic only mentions one attack which killed 3.

The true extent of terrorism against Israelis is also frequently distorted and minimized by the media when attacks that don't kill anyone are ignored, even if there are numerous injuries and even if the attack had the potential for many deaths. On March 7, there were 3 terrorist attacks, and another 2 terrorist attacks that were foiled by alert Israeli civilians. On a day where there were 5 attempts to kill massive numbers of Israelis, in many news accounts only the attack which resulted in deaths was even mentioned.

The media also frequently distort the news through verbal contortions aimed at avoiding the use of the word "terrorist."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bias; ccrm; islamicviolence; israel; lamestreammedia; media; presstitutes; terror; zionist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
They report, who decides?
1 posted on 03/15/2002 12:02:15 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BrightWing;2sheep;Yehuda;dennisw;PA Engineer;SJackson;veronica;Alouette
Ugly Times.
2 posted on 03/15/2002 12:04:40 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2;American in Israel;JohnHuang2
Remember the Moment Cafe attack?? Well, I peeked at the Dallas Morning News the following day and the story was buried on 34A. It still had a pro-Palie spin
3 posted on 03/15/2002 12:11:09 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I am afraid that with Zinni over there, it will only get worse, and have, of late, been questioning whether or not Sharon has lost his mind. Peres and Co. are running things diametrically opposed to Sharon's original operating plan and for the life of me, I can think of no good reason why Sharon ever put Peres in such a high office. If he thought his unity government really meant unity, he was less than brilliant at the time. Now he is so shakey that I fear for Israel more every day.
There was an article by Debbie Saunders in the SF Chronicle from back in October that was titled, "Don't Feed Israel to the Beast". It said that sacrificing Israel would only whet the beast's appetite. It looks as though that article rang too true.
4 posted on 03/15/2002 12:58:55 AM PST by BrightWing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL;dennisw;Yehuda;Pissed Off Janitor;rebdov;2sheep;knighthawk
Yesterday:

LYNCHINGS IN RAMALLAH AND MANGER SQUARE, BETHLEHEM




With all the pictures AP sends out throughout the world showing the events of The Oslo War, you might see something besides the "plight of the poor Palestinians" ... and then again, maybe you wouldn't.
While we do not know the political beliefs of their journalists, we do know that most of the pictures coming from Israel are taken by Arabs. Don't believe us? Just go to: Yahoo News Page and do a search for news photos, using some key words like: Israel, Ramallah, Gaza, etc. and see for yourself!
Even taking in account political beliefs, you would think that a journalist must take pictures of "hot stories" - no matter what, right?

Well, how about a story of the "collaborator" hung up in central Ramallah just a few days ago? True - the two pictures that they did take got into the press - but, for some reason, AP has deleted them from their photo database ...

Well then, how about the story of the two "collaborators" that were killed, mutilated, and then dragged through the streets of biblical Bethlehem and layed out in Manger Square. Well - there also were two pictures.

Notice the word "were" since AP deleted these also - just minutes after GAMLA took them.

We have heard the story before ... AP gave into Arab pressure and threats before, and it goes on all the time.

Maybe we should call this: "The Arab Lynch of the Free Press"?

In any case - all those who want to view these (graphic) pictures may do so FREELY by Clicking on the link below. We strongly suggest that these pictures get emailed to as many people you can send them to. A lynch in Manger Square should be a strong message as to the myth of "Arab" solidarity with the Christian world.

GAMLA

5 posted on 03/15/2002 5:25:34 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
I cannot find any mention of this lynching in the media in the Netherlands. Of course, by showing the public such things, they might think no longer of the Palestinians as 'poor, oppressed' people.
6 posted on 03/15/2002 5:29:14 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
These are their own people accused of being collaborators. It is so sick, it defies human logic.
7 posted on 03/15/2002 5:34:45 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
....New York Times, the last paragraph states, "At least 1012 Palestinians and 319 Israelis have been killed since the Palestinian uprising began after peace talks stalled." It would be much more fair to write: "More than 319 Israelis have been killed – most of them civilians targeted by Palestinian terrorists – while more than 1012 Palestinians have been killed, usually while engaged in violent attacks against Israelis."

Whether or not the scumbag wire services report news from Israel fairly, most people "get it" anyway.
Israel must be relentless in its cockroach extermination efforts.
The ration, 319 to 1012, could be improved.

8 posted on 03/15/2002 5:45:17 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Nix 2
Yet many in the media have been minimizing attention on the brutal Palestinian terrorism while emphasizing the focus on Israel's military response.

Typical of the Jew-hating secular liberal media, all claims of tolerance, compassion and diversity to the contrary. How American Jews can so overwhelmingly support the fraud of liberalism is beyond me.

10 posted on 03/15/2002 6:02:14 AM PST by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I wish people got it, but unless the full story is somehow brought out in the leftstream press, many people really do not know. They believe the palestinians are salvageable. Maybe once-upon-a-time, but no longer. They have tasted too much Israeli blood, and taken too much of their own. These are very sick and dangerous people. Islamic Jihad wants nothing less than a Muslim world. It does not matter who or how. Anyone who gets in their way is in for the exact same treatment. If they don't care about their own, you can be damn sure they don't care about anyone else.
11 posted on 03/15/2002 6:02:47 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Euro-American Scum
How American Jews can so overwhelmingly support the fraud of liberalism is beyond me.

This has always been a head scratcher with me, too.
Like with every other kind of people, you have some who are not exactly the brightest bulbs in the chandalier. But there does seem to be a disproportionate number of American Jews who are rabid liberals. They even support gun control, LOFL !!!! They may as well be saying, "Sure. You want me on that train? In that boxcar over there? Well, I don't suppose I have much choice in the matter....."
The stupidity is overwhelming.

12 posted on 03/15/2002 6:18:17 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
They decide what not to report in order to prevent any informed decision by anyone. They are worthless, they should go sell shoes at payless. Everyone see right through them.
13 posted on 03/15/2002 6:25:04 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
I was really impressed by Fox's "fair and balanced" report from Ramalla last night. Whoraldo's reports were pure propaganda, and the last one I saw was an outright editorial (crying for the poor palis and condemning Israel's "invasion"). Each of them featured some film of an Israeli tank firing the big gun at an armed terrorist standing in a doorway. We were able to watch the turret train on him, fire, and then see him and the doorway explode. That was appropriate.

But we don't see what happens to Israeli victims. And we don't see people jumping from the WTC. That would be insensitive.

I decided last night that when reporters say something would be insensitive, they mean it wouldn't support their overall agenda.

14 posted on 03/15/2002 6:40:02 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
MASADA

Early this year Geraldo Rivera became a field reporter for FoxNews. He is now reporting from the Middle East. On the evening of Mar.13, 2002 he reported from Jerusalem his opinions on the current wave of Arab terrorism and Israeli responses. Here are his ridiculous findings:

1. By responding to the indescriminate Arab terrorism against Israeli citizens, the IDF has become just like the terrorists they are fighting.

2. The washable ink I.D. markings the IDF applies to suspected Arab terrorists prior to interrigation, are like the Nazi tattooing of Jews during the Holocaust!

3. His heart breaks when he thinks about 12 year old Mohammed al-Dura who was "killed in the crossfire." [Is it possible that he does not know that the Palestinians murdered "Little Mo" and made it look like the IDF did it!

We at Masada2000.org have contacted Brit Hume at FoxNews. It was on his Special Report" news show that Rivera spouted his typically leftwing bias against Israel... all the while claiming he is a long time Zionist who would give his life for Israel!

Brit Hume is one of the best reporter/commentators in the news business. He is also very well-versed on the Arab-Israeli conflict and has long been a strong supporter of Israel's right to exist. Even HE was a bit stunned by Rivera's baffling remarks. If more people like Rivera join FoxNews, FoxNews will be just another pro-Arab CNN!

If you wish to express your views to Mr. Hume send him an email at special@foxnews.com
You may also call Fox at 1-888-369-4762

15 posted on 03/15/2002 7:23:30 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
More like, "we'll report it quickly and then yank the story so you can't call us "biased" but most of you won't be able to decide fairly which is what we want."
16 posted on 03/15/2002 8:25:50 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2; Lion's Cub
FoxNews will be just another pro-whabislamanazi: Cresent News Network!
17 posted on 03/15/2002 12:59:12 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2; BrightWing; Prodigal Daughter; Yehuda
Someone said that Yahoo is owned by Muslims.  That would account for its editorial policy in photos and news.  Often when someone reports of something that conflicts with the ongoing satanic/globalist/muslim agenda, shills fill a thread shrieking, "Tinfoil" and "Conspiracy" and so on.  We just continue to hold onto the Truth.

It is distressing to see so many people continue to ingest the lies of the prevailing media.  Here's another link which shows that the DECEPTION is stratospheric in proportions:

 President's Popularity remains stratospheric, defying all 'conventional wisdom' 

18 posted on 03/15/2002 1:08:31 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
Theres a saying in the country he disowned Australia that no self respecting fish would be wrapped in a Murdoch Newspaper...and its not because of a conservative bias.
19 posted on 03/15/2002 1:14:38 PM PST by Governor StrangeReno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Governor StrangeReno;Nix 2;2sheep
If you want to read about leftist media bias in Australia (especially Murdoch papers) go to www.newaus.com
20 posted on 03/16/2002 6:27:07 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson