Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
".....which is almost always a sure sign the feds are hiding something...."

Clinton would never allow/admit that America was actually attacked under his watch. Bad for his "legacy".

We have been under attack for years, and Clowntoon would never make public this fact.

Observe the difference under a real leader. Dubya says "sucker punch us, huh? Ever wonder what it would feel like to be thrown into a tree shredder?"

5 posted on 03/15/2002 3:06:40 AM PST by Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Victor; donozark
Who's the best enemy for Clinton's bunch?
Who helps their anti-right agenda most?
Who is easier to attack and repress?
Could it possibly be the VRWC?

Many have wondered why McVeigh and Nichols haven't said anything if there was an Iraqi/terrorist connection. Reports from numerous sources say that if a member talks, reprisal against all family members is standard fare in all terrorist organizations. Given that fact, maybe the Federal Witness program would loosen Nichol's tongue a little.

9 posted on 03/15/2002 3:40:37 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Victor
'Bad for his "legacy".'

Imnho, it wasn't his "leagcy" Clinton was protecting -- it was that "terrorism" IS bad for current business. Clinton, more than anything else, is astute at the business aspect of public service. Moreover his impulsive nature combined with the immediacy of his charisma and adept extemporanizing means that Clinton is not and CAN NOT be a forward thinker, a planner. His strength is in the current moment, in seizing immediate opportunity.

50 posted on 03/16/2002 7:34:09 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson