Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billy Graham Responds to Lingering Anger Over 1972 Remarks on Jews
AP via NY Times ^ | March 17, 2002 | AP via NY Times

Posted on 03/16/2002 8:03:22 PM PST by churchillbuff

March 17, 2002

Billy Graham Responds to Lingering Anger Over 1972 Remarks on Jews

By DAVID FIRESTONE

The Associated Press The Rev. Billy Graham, left, with President Richard M. Nixon at an evangelistic crusade in Pittsburgh in 1968. A tape of a 1972 White House conversation between them has angered Jewish organizations.

It seemed impossible, when H. R. Haldeman's White House diaries came out in 1994, that the Rev. Billy Graham could once have joined with President Richard M. Nixon in discussing the "total Jewish domination of the media." Could Mr. Graham, the great American evangelist, really have said the nation's problem lies with "satanic Jews," as Mr. Nixon's aide recorded?

Mr. Graham's sterling reputation as a healer and bridge-builder was so at odds with Mr. Haldeman's account that Jewish groups paid little attention, especially because he denied the remarks so strongly.

"Those are not my words," Mr. Graham said in a public statement in May 1994. "I have never talked publicly or privately about the Jewish people, including conversations with President Nixon, except in the most positive terms."

That was the end of the story, it seemed, until two weeks ago, when the tape of that 1972 conversation in the Oval Office was made public by the National Archives. Three decades after it was recorded, the North Carolina preacher's famous drawl is tinny but unmistakable on the tape, denigrating Jews in terms far stronger than the diary accounts.

"They're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff," Mr. Graham said on the tape, after agreeing with Mr. Nixon that left-wing Jews dominate the news media. The Jewish "stranglehold has got to be broken or the country's going down the drain," he continued, suggesting that if Mr. Nixon were re-elected, "then we might be able to do something."

Finally, Mr. Graham said that Jews did not know his true feelings about them.

"I go and I keep friends with Mr. Rosenthal at The New York Times and people of that sort, you know," he told Mr. Nixon, referring to A. M. Rosenthal, then the newspaper's executive editor. "And all — I mean, not all the Jews, but a lot of the Jews are great friends of mine, they swarm around me and are friendly to me because they know that I'm friendly with Israel. But they don't know how I really feel about what they are doing to this country. And I have no power, no way to handle them, but I would stand up if under proper circumstances."

Mr. Graham, who is now 83 and in poor health, quickly issued a four- sentence apology, but he did not acknowledge making the statements and said he had no memory of the conversation, which took place after a prayer breakfast on Feb. 1, 1972.

The brevity of the apology and Mr. Graham's refusal to discuss the matter further have angered many of the same Jewish organizations that for so long counted Mr. Graham as their best friend among evangelical Christians. The taped remarks have become the subject of synagogue sermons and columns in Jewish newspapers, with some Jewish leaders suggesting that Mr. Graham had hidden anti-Semitic views for decades.

"Here we have an American icon, the closest we have to a spiritual leader of America, who has been playing a charade for all these years," Abraham H. Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said in an interview last week. "What's frightening is that he has been so close to so many presidents, and who knows what else he has been saying privately."

Mr. Foxman urged Mr. Graham to return the award he won in 1971 from the National Conference of Christians and Jews — one of many such awards presented to him.

Yesterday, Mr. Graham's organization issued a longer apology, in which Mr. Graham acknowledged making the statements, but repudiated them.

"I don't ever recall having those feelings about any group, especially the Jews, and I certainly do not have them now," he said. "My remarks did not reflect my love for the Jewish people. I humbly ask the Jewish community to reflect on my actions on behalf of Jews over the years that contradict my words in the Oval Office that day."

Mr. Foxman subsequently issued a statement accepting the new apology, but for many Jews the damage had already been done. In a recent column in several Jewish newspapers, the Washington journalist James D. Besser said the remarks should awaken Jews to the intense dislike for them among many evangelical Christians, except insofar as Jews are useful to the fulfillment of Christian apocalyptic prophecies.

The tapes have been particularly disturbing to people and groups who have worked to find common ground between Jews and evangelical Christians, many of whom say that their progress has now been significantly set back. For years, Mr. Graham stood apart from other evangelicals in his refusal to proselytize Jews directly, sharply disagreeing on the issue with his own denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention. Because of that stance, the American Jewish Committee presented Mr. Graham with its National Interreligious Award in 1977, calling him one of the century's greatest Christian friends of Jews.

The taped remarks, however, will only help perpetuate the stereotypes that Jews and evangelicals hold about each other, said Rabbi Yechiel Z. Eckstein, president of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, based in Chicago.

"Jewish friends are coming up to me now and saying, `See, we told you so — they're all frauds,' " said Rabbi Eckstein, an Orthodox Jew who has become a liaison between Israel and evangelical Christians.

Mr. Graham's friends and biographers have tried to come up with some explanation for an act that so sharply diverges from five decades of almost universally admired public behavior. Lewis Drummond, the Billy Graham Professor of Evangelism and Church Growth at Samford University, a Southern Baptist institution in Birmingham, Ala., said he believed that Mr. Graham was referring throughout his conversation only to those few Jews he considered unethical for distributing pornography.

"There's not an anti-Semitic bone in his body," said Dr. Drummond, a longtime friend of Mr. Graham's who has written a book about him. Dr. Drummond recalled that Mr. Graham had always preached against intolerance, refusing — in the South of the 1950's and 60's — to hold his crusades in segregated auditoriums and inviting the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to join him in the pulpit.

Another biographer, William Martin of Rice University, suggested that Mr. Graham was thinking only of liberal Jews with whom he disagreed politically. Mr. Martin said that just as Mr. Graham grew up in a culture of segregation and moved beyond it, he had also evolved beyond what his thoughts were in 1972.

Mr. Graham's statement yesterday expressed hope that he had grown past his words that day in the Oval Office. Describing himself as "an old man of 83 suffering from several ailments," he said his life had been a pilgrimage of growth and change.

"Every year during their High Holy Days, the Jewish community reminds us all of our need for repentance and forgiveness," he wrote. "God's mercy and grace give me hope — for myself, and for our world."


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: culture; politics; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last
To: Fast 1975
"The media and everything associated with it is private property. No one is forced to patronize it. Graham and his large following have every opportunity to start their own newspapers and television channels."

And if we just "work within the system" we can restore our Constitutional Republic and our Constitutional protectections against government exploitation and oppression.

Sure we can.

81 posted on 03/19/2002 9:16:40 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
His statements, accurate or not, about "total Jewish domination of the media" and his expression of concern about that domination (real or not) can not necessarily be classified as saying something negative about Jews.
82 posted on 03/19/2002 9:21:52 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
"He viewed the Jews as his enemy.

You have no grounds for that assertion.

83 posted on 03/19/2002 9:23:47 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
"How many weapons do you have at home, and how do you plan to use them to take care of the Jews you despise before the LORD God of Israel sends your soul to .... ?

I suspected it before, but this post makes clear, you're just a nut, totally insane.

At least I won't have to waste anymore time posting to you.

84 posted on 03/19/2002 9:28:45 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Jude Wanniski to Morton Zuckerman: DO JEWS CONTROL THE MEDIA
85 posted on 03/19/2002 9:33:46 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightofrush
No, it works, it's just a little out there. I do see Jakes being the new Billy Graham and I don't agree necessarily with everything Jakes is doing, I'm just not sure about the Illuminati
86 posted on 03/19/2002 9:39:17 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: Aurelius
Bring on all the tapes. Expose and shame all the bigots.

Nixon urged audits of Jewish contributors

Newly-released tapes show President Richard Nixon pushed for tax audits of wealthy Jewish contributors to his Democratic rivals, the San Francisco Examiner reported in its Sunday editions.

The Examiner said the revelation was contained in more than 200 hours of recently-released Nixon White House tapes.

Nixon, who resigned in 1974 after being implicated in a cover-up of a break-in at Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate Building, had a hidden system installed to record his conversations.

The conversations took place in September 1971 when Nixon was worried about his re-election prospects, the Examiner said in a copyright story.

In a Sept. 8, 1971, meeting with domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman, the Examiner quoted Nixon as saying: ``John, we have the power. Are we using it now to investigate contributors to (defeated 1968 Democratic candidate) Hubert Humphrey, contributors to (then Democratic presidential contender Edmund) Muskie -- the Jews, you know, that are stealing in every direction?''

``Are we going after their tax returns? ...I can only hope that we are, frankly, doing a little persecuting,'' he said.

Five days later, during a meeting with Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, Nixon said: ``Now here's the point, Bob, please get me the names of the Jews. You know, the big Jewish contributors to the Democrats,'' he said. Using an expletive to refer to the contributors, he asked to have some of them investigated.

Nixon expressed anger that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was ``going after Billy Graham tooth and nail.'' Graham, a famous evangelical preacher, was a close friend of Nixon.

A day later, meeting with Haldeman and political aide Charles Colson, Nixon is quoted as asking: ``What about the rich Jews? The IRS is full of Jews, Bob.'' Later, he added: ``Go after 'em like a son of a bitch!''

The Examiner said it could not be determined whether any Jewish Democratic contributors were audited as a result of Nixon's conversations with his aides.

Reacting to the tapes, Robert Strauss, a prominent Democratic fundraiser and a Jew, told the Examiner that ``this language coming out of the mouth of a president of the United States is more than I can really comprehend. It's sickening.'' Strauss was treasurer of the Democratic National Committee in 1971.

The newspaper said the tapes also showed Nixon approved an aide's plan to secretly photograph Vietnam War records legally entrusted to the National Archives by anti-war defense analysts. Under a legal agreement, the papers could not be shown to anyone without the permission of the analysts.

Ehrlichman told Nixon in a Sept. 10, 1971 meeting that he was going to steal the documents. ``Do that,'' Nixon said.

``And photograph them and find out what the hell's up,'' Ehrlichman continued.

``How do we do that?'' Nixon asks, before Ehrlichman outlined a plan to have the archivist sent out of town. Ultimately, the Examiner said, the plan became unnecessary because the archives allowed a Pentagon official to study the records. Nixon died in 1994.

91 posted on 03/19/2002 10:00:50 AM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
"However, I cannot imagine what caused me to make those comments, which I totally repudiate. Whatever the reason, I was wrong for not disagreeing with the president, and I sincerely apologize to anyone I have offended,"

Billy Graham no longer stands by those comments that the other bigots proffer.

92 posted on 03/19/2002 10:05:42 AM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
"I don't ever recall having those feelings about any group

Sounds like a lie to me.

93 posted on 03/19/2002 10:06:52 AM PST by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: a_witness
In a Sept. 8, 1971, meeting with domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman, the Examiner quoted Nixon as saying: ``John, we have the power. Are we using it now to investigate contributors to (defeated 1968 Democratic candidate) Hubert Humphrey, contributors to (then Democratic presidential contender Edmund) Muskie -- the Jews, you know, that are stealing in every direction?''

Nixon wanted to crack down on the crooks. Clinton, at the behest of Abe Foxman, chose to pardon them.

95 posted on 03/19/2002 10:25:03 AM PST by ThreeOfSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ThreeOfSeven
Nixon wanted to crack down on the Jews
96 posted on 03/19/2002 10:26:36 AM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
Only the crooked ones.
97 posted on 03/19/2002 10:29:27 AM PST by ThreeOfSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ThreeOfSeven
No, he wanted to go after "the rich Jews."

Come now, be honest about how you really feel, are you an anti-semitic bigot like Nixon ?

98 posted on 03/19/2002 10:35:00 AM PST by a_witness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: a_witness;ThreeOfSeven
http://www.english.upenn.edu/~afilreis/Holocaust/nixon-antisemite.html

In a Sept. 8, 1971, meeting with domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman, the Examiner quoted Nixon as saying: ``John, we have the power. Are we using it now to investigate contributors to (defeated 1968 Democratic candidate) Hubert Humphrey, contributors to (then Democratic presidential contender Edmund) Muskie -- the Jews, you know, that are stealing in every direction?''

``Are we going after their tax returns? ...I can only hope that we are, frankly, doing a little persecuting,'' he said.

Five days later, during a meeting with Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, Nixon said: ``Now here's the point, Bob, please get me the names of the Jews. You know, the big Jewish contributors to the Democrats,'' he said. Using an expletive to refer to the contributors, he asked to have some of them investigated.

Nixon expressed anger that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was ``going after Billy Graham tooth and nail.'' Graham, a famous evangelical preacher, was a close friend of Nixon.

A day later, meeting with Haldeman and political aide Charles Colson, Nixon is quoted as asking: ``What about the rich Jews? The IRS is full of Jews, Bob.'' Later, he added: ``Go after 'em like a son of a bitch!''

The Examiner said it could not be determined whether any Jewish Democratic contributors were audited as a result of Nixon's conversations with his aides.

......................

Reads like all of them to me. He's talking about persecuting, not prosecuting.

99 posted on 03/19/2002 10:44:50 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: a_witness
It didn't take long for you to stoop to personal attacks.
100 posted on 03/19/2002 10:45:41 AM PST by ThreeOfSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson