Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is It Possible, Could America Have Won the Vietnam War In '1968?
Article by: Gene Kuentzler '1999 ^ | 3/17/02 | Gene Kuentzler

Posted on 03/17/2002 2:25:49 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2002 2:25:49 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
And if the military had been honest with the media from the start, maybe Cronkite would not have just assumed they were lying when they told him Tet was a failure.
2 posted on 03/17/2002 2:29:20 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
I think we would have won if we let the military do its job. That would have included invading north vietnam and wiping out the root of the problem.
3 posted on 03/17/2002 2:30:35 PM PST by glockmeister40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
"Is It Possible, Could America Have Won the Vietnam War In '1968?"

YES.

4 posted on 03/17/2002 2:32:30 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
It became a political instrument, used by politicians for political purposes. Had the military been allowed to conduct it as a "war," it would have been won. But they were subjected to the political persuasions of the politicians who were micro-managing and conducting it from their offices in Washington, DC.
5 posted on 03/17/2002 2:35:32 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
The US concentrated too much on "body counts". The Communists weren't that much concerned about bodies -- they had lots of cannon-fodder. What they DIDN'T have that much of was cash.

If the US had concentrated on economic targets (destroying the dikes in North Vietnam and ruining the rice harvest; taking out the warehouses in Haiphong; etc) and gotten the North too busy keeping its own people from starving to look for trouble down South, things might have been different

6 posted on 03/17/2002 2:41:28 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
We NEVER lost the war. We left.
7 posted on 03/17/2002 2:46:24 PM PST by freedomtrail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
Walter Cronkite sold out America February 28, 1968, when he stated that we could not win in Vietnam.

4 years later we implemented Linbacker II, after North Vietnam walked out of the peace talks.

After intensive bombing of North Vietname (known as the Christmas offensice), the North Vietnamese ran back to the peace talks and signed the peace agreement.

We did NOT lose in Vietnam.

8 posted on 03/17/2002 2:48:30 PM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I agree. I'v got a question for anyone that would care to answer. All of the fighing seemed to be focused in South Vietnam, why. Would we today, if we declared war on North Vietnam, take it to North Vietnam, instead of killing the South. It was the South that wanted free of the North.

Now I certainly am no expert when it comes to war, but I would have knocked the he** out of the North. It was politics, right, all politics? Seems to me we were totally destroying the wrong part of Vietnam.

9 posted on 03/17/2002 2:51:32 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
they were on their knees and had prepared to negotiate a "surrender.

This is not a credible statement!

10 posted on 03/17/2002 2:51:46 PM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomtrail
Your so right, they were pulled out! To this day my husband will never understand. Vietname 70'-74'.
11 posted on 03/17/2002 2:53:16 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
I don't understand, if we won, why is the South still overrun and ruled by the North and Russia. I have a friend that came here by homemade boat in 1983, she said it became unbearable and dangerous because of the North and the Russians, their's and their children lives were in danger all the time. They stayed hungry and desperate, who's lying? Thank you.
12 posted on 03/17/2002 2:56:56 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
We had that war won and snatched defeat from victory at least three times. The first defeat for us was Kennedy's assassination of Diem. The second was McNamara's defeatest military strategy. Nixon's bombing of the north was bring about capitulation until it was shut off here.

go here

http://freedom.orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/rlkocher_index.htm

for a 190 page analysis of the Viet Nam War complete with recently released Kennedy tapes documenting the assassination.

13 posted on 03/17/2002 2:58:45 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity
This statement was make by "Senior General Vo Njuyen Giap" NVC commander. It is in his book.
14 posted on 03/17/2002 3:00:47 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Thank you RLK.
15 posted on 03/17/2002 3:02:03 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
The truth is that as of October 1967 the war was over, in that North Vietnam could not win it and they knew it. Tet 68 was their last gasp and if we had not been sold down the river we would have won AND we would not be wondering today about MIA's and a lot of other things. The veterans of "the conflict" would have been treated like heroes and Hanoi Jane would have been... (I guess I was just dreaming)
16 posted on 03/17/2002 3:02:17 PM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
maybe Cronkite would not have just assumed they were lying when they told him Tet was a failure. 2 posted on 3/17/02 3:29 PM Pacific by xm177e2

Cronkite is an avowed Socialist
17 posted on 03/17/2002 3:03:57 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
True enough...
18 posted on 03/17/2002 3:05:28 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freedomtrail
We NEVER lost the war. We left.

We left = We lost the war in Vietnam

19 posted on 03/17/2002 3:05:55 PM PST by Recon by Fire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mom_Grandmother
Gene Kuentzler is either lazy or relies on Doris Kearns Goodwin to do his research. According to records, by the end of 1967 there were 19,560 KIAs alone and by the end of 1968 there were 36,152 KIAs.
20 posted on 03/17/2002 3:06:55 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson