Replies

Glossed over in the media's glorification of Rosie O'Donell's public announcement that she has sex with other women were these startling contradictions: O'Donnell's frank admission that she believes her own adopted children would be better off being raised by a married mother and father, bolstered by her hope that the children won't follow her example and engage in homosexual behavior themselves.

"Would it be easier for (my kids) if I were married to a man? It probably would," O'Donnell told ABC News reporter Diane Sawyer. http://www.drudgereport.com/mattro.htm

And when asked if she hopes her adopted children will grow up to be "straight"...

"Yes, I do," Rosie said. "I think life is easier if you're straight...if I were to pick, would I rather have my children have to go through the struggles of being gay in America, or being heterosexual, I would say heterosexual."

Thus the biggest conclusion Americans should draw from the Rosie O'Donnell confessional is this -- that Ms. O'Donnell is a privileged adult who put her own feelings ahead of what even she believes would be in the best interests of the children, and who used her privilege and wealth to place children too young to object in an environment that two recent studies indicate will make them more likely to engage in the very high risk behavior Rosie hopes they won't.

Rosie O'Donnell...

Everything about her is a lie. She is not a parent - - there are no children that are the product of her ovaries. She wants children but claims she is homosexual - - the desire to have children is a heterosexual desire. Rosie just can't make up her mind. By definition, homosexuals do not reproduce - - it is self-imposed sterility.

No person can ever have a "sex change." The use of the language has been so twisted by the leftist radicals, that in our touchy-feely world, many blindly accept some of these erroneous terminologies.

XX or XY chromosones can't be changed after conception when mitosis begins.

The physicians who do this type of cosmetic mutilation should not be allowed to practice medicine. The same goes for breast implants: instead of lawsuits against Dow-Corning, the doctors who implanted the silicone bags should be held liable...

"Homosexuals" are still genetically male or female.They are sterile. In genetics: XO (Turner syndrome), XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), XXX (poly-X syndrome), and XYY (Jacob syndrome). No matter how many X chromosones there are, any individual with a Y chromosone developes into a male. These abnormalities are so few, only one in thousands occur.

So much for the "gay" gene - - it does not exist. The reality of human reproductive biology smacks them hard across the face. There is no such thing as a homosexual parent. Homosexuals do not reproduce. Reproduction requires heterosexual interaction...

"Homosexuals" are still genetically male or female. They are sterile. In genetics: XO (Turner syndrome), XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), XXX (poly-X syndrome), and XYY (Jacob syndrome). No matter how many X chromosones there are, any individual with a Y chromosone developes into a male. These abnormalities are so few, only one in thousands occur.

I would agree with certain exceptions for CAIS and Mosaicism and yet a definite gender can always be determined, though not immediately, for these syndromes. There are some here who try and use abnormal sex differentiation syndromes to justify the practice of perversion for the so called “transgendered” even though those with ASDS have no more of a rate of “homosexuality” than the 2-3% of the general population.