Skip to comments.
Sheriff says 'gun nut' concealing the truth
Tri-Valley Herald ^
| 17 March 2002
| Dwight King-Leatham
Posted on 03/18/2002 4:18:27 PM PST by 45Auto
Edited on 07/09/2004 12:50:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
To: tpaine
We were saying 'dork' in the early fifties. And the 70's, and the '80s, and the '90s. What on earth is your point?
61
posted on
03/19/2002 7:09:22 AM PST
by
1L
To: tpaine
Join the Libertarian revolt, tovarich!
To: Texaggie79
You have established no REASON for your silly charges against libertarians, Mr. Mitty. -- Just some lame personal anecdotes. -- Please, give us more laughs.
63
posted on
03/19/2002 7:13:53 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: 1L
Ask texaggie. -- He claims I'm to old to use the term, for some weird reason. -- And please, do tell us why it concerns you.
64
posted on
03/19/2002 7:18:39 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
It called common sense...
To: Cultural Jihad
Posting pics of your jihadic leader wrapped in a U.S, flag is sicko, obsessive behavior CJ.
- I know, -- you don't care. -- And can't stop, in any case.
66
posted on
03/19/2002 7:24:18 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: Texaggie79
Those aren't libertarians you picture. They are sickos, exactly like you & CJ. Raving loonies.
67
posted on
03/19/2002 7:29:18 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Many register LP and vote LP. They are part of the LP. Sure I would like to say that the likes of McCain and Lott are not Republicans, they are rinos, but that is not fact.
To: 45Auto
"He's one of those people who once he grabs onto a fact, he builds a fantasy around that," said Sheriff Warren Rupf. Translation: "That bastard uncovered my cozy little world of corruption and he's going to pay".
69
posted on
03/19/2002 7:40:21 AM PST
by
arm958
To: Texaggie79
So? -- You have a real point to this ceaseless irrational 'hate on' that you have for libertarianism? -- Simply put, we work for a return to original constitutional values, as per JR's vision for this site.
Why do you attack us?
70
posted on
03/19/2002 7:43:27 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Why do you attack us?I only attack those that go beyond the Constitution and claim that there is some restriction on States prohibiting drugs.
To: Texaggie79
So you have PROOF that the only reason people work within the LP is because they are drug users?
To: Texaggie79
o
To: Stew Padasso
So you have PROOF that the only reason people work within the LP is because they are drug users?I NEVER SAID THAT. I said some of them. And that is undeniable.
To: Texaggie79
If states have a constitutional 'right' to prohibit drugs, it follows they can use the same power to prohibit anything, including guns.
You cannot refute this logic, & have never even tried to do so.
Nows your chance. - Do it.
75
posted on
03/19/2002 8:01:51 AM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
If states have a constitutional 'right' to prohibit drugs, it follows they can use the same power to prohibit anything, including guns. They have the power to prohibit that which is not restricted by the USC, and that would rule out guns.
To: Texaggie79
They are also part of the GOP and the liberal Left. What does that have to do with anything? Should they be removed from the voting rolls? Should the GOP refuse every vote from anyone who has ever done illegal substances?
Your obsessive-compulsive postings on the LP are really disruptive. This thread could have been a great RKBA discussion, but you have some psychotic need to redirect it to your own topic. It's really annoying. Please stop. Save the LP stuff for the LP threads at the very least, okay?
(BTW, you were whining that you were in the minority on those threads... do you not see the strong probability that this would be a indicator that you just might be WRONG?!? I've learned many things on FR, and have been corrected several times. It's a sign of maturity to accept critiques, and to update your knowledge base. You seem more interested in shouting matches, half-truths, and converting as many threads as possible to LP debates.)
To: Texaggie79
From your first post on this thread (most often your first post is intended to provoke and smear) - "Can you not even have the dignity to admit that many in the LP are drug users and that is the main reason they choose to be Libertarian?"
Then once you are called out, you come back with - "I NEVER SAID THAT. I said some of them. And that is undeniable."
How does this jive? "Many in the LP are drug users" and the "main reason." I guess many and some mean the some?
Are you just looking for attention?
To: Teacher317
Either you have yet to get the "holier than thou" attitude of Libertarians, or you have taken on the attitude yourself. Your pick
To: Stew Padasso
It DOES jive. Many in the LP are there because they want drugs legalized, because they want to do them. Not all, not every, not most.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson