Posted on 03/20/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by erk
|
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002
Statement by the President
Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system. The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.
The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions. I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.
###
I WISH I could agree with you.
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 - Title I: Reduction of Special Interest Influence - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) to prohibit: (1) national political party committees (including any officer, agent, or entity they directly or indirectly establish, finance, maintain, or control) (officer, agent, or entity) from soliciting, receiving, directing, transferring, or spending money that is subject to FECA limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements; (2) soft money spending (not currently subject to FECA) for a Federal election activity, in general, by State, district, and local political party committees (including any officer, agent, or entity) or by an association or similar group of candidates for State or local office or State or local officials; (3) soft money spending for fundraising costs by any such committee, officer, agent, or entity; (4) national, State, district, or local political party committees (including national political party congressional campaign committees, entities, officers, or agents) from soliciting, any funds for, or making or directing any donations to certain tax-exempt organizations; and (5) candidates for Federal office, Federal office holders, or their agents from soliciting, receiving, directing, transferring, or spending funds in connection with a Federal election, including funds for any Federal election activity, unless they are subject to FECA limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements, or in connection with any non-Federal election unless such funds meet specified requirements.
(Sec. 101) Prohibits any funds for soft money accounts from being solicited, received, directed, transferred, or spent in the name of national political parties, Federal candidates or officials, or by joint fundraising activities by two or more party committees.
Defines Federal election activity to include: (1) voter registration activity in the last 120 days of a Federal election; (2) voter identification, get-out-the-vote, or generic campaign activity conducted in connection with an election in which a Federal candidate is on the ballot; (3) public communications that refer to a clearly identified Federal candidate and promote, support, attack, or oppose a candidate for Federal office (regardless of whether they expressly advocate a vote for or against); or (4) services by a State, district, or local political party employee who spends at least 25 percent of paid time per month on activities in connection with a Federal election.
Defines generic campaign activity as a campaign activity that promotes a political party and does not promote a candidate or non-Federal candidate.
Defines public communications as communications by means of any broadcast, cable, satellite communication, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, mass mailing (over 500 identical or substantially similar pieces mailed within any 30-day period), or phone bank (over 500 identical or substantially similar telephone calls made within any 30-day period) to the general public, or any other form of general public political advertising.
(Sec. 102) Increases limit on individual contributions to a State committee of a political party from $5,000 to $10,000 per year.
(Sec. 103) Codifies Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations on disclosure of all national political party committee activity, both Federal and non-Federal.
Requires disclosure by State and local parties of spending on Federal election activities, including any soft money permitted to be used for such activities.
Terminates the building fund exception to the definition of contribution.
Title II: Noncandidate Campaign Expenditures - Subtitle A: Electioneering Communications - Amends FECA to require disclosure to the FEC of electioneering communications by any spender exceeding an aggregate of $10,000 per year in disbursements for them (including contracts to disburse), within 24 hours of each specified disbursement date (disclosure date).
(Sec. 201) Requires such disclosure to include: (1) identification of spender, of any person with control over the activities of such person, and of the custodian of the spender's books and accounts; (2) the spender's principal place of business (if the spender is not an individual); (3) amount of disbursements of over $200 and identification of recipient; (4) the election and candidates to which communications pertain; and (5) identification of all contributors of $1,000 or more (either to a separate segregated fund or, if none, to the spender).
Defines electioneering communication as any broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that refers to a clearly identified Federal candidate, made within 60 days of a general, special, or runoff election, or within 30 days of a primary or preference election, or a convention or caucus of a political party that has authority to nominate a candidate, for the office the candidate seeks, and, in the case of a communication that refers to a candidate for an office other than President or Vice President, is targeted to the relevant electorate. Provides an alternative definition of the term if the first definition is held to be constitutionally insufficient. Lists exceptions to the definition of electioneering communication. Provides that a communication that refers to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office is "targeted to the relevant electorate" if the communication can be received by 50,000 or more persons in the district the candidate seeks to represent, in the case of a candidate for Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, Congress or in the State the candidate seeks to represent, in the case of a candidate for Senator.
Directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to compile, maintain, and publicize on its website any information the FEC may require to carry out these requirements.
(Sec. 202) Treats an electioneering communication that is coordinated with a candidate or an authorized committee of such candidate, a Federal, State, or local political party or committee thereof, or an agent or official of any such candidate, party, or committee as a contribution to, and expenditure by, such candidate or such party.
(Sec. 203) Bans disbursements for electioneering communications from union or certain corporate funds, except certain tax-exempt corporations making electioneering communications: (1) paid for exclusively with funds provided directly by individuals who are citizens or permanent resident aliens; and (2) which are not targeted electioneering communications.
(Dan: - MCRGO and the NRA are considered corporations. Corporate money is banned on the state level)
Subtitle B: Independent and Coordinated Expenditures - Amends FECA to define independent expenditure as an expenditure by a person expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, and that is not made in concert or cooperation with or at the request or suggestion of such candidate, the candidate's authorized political committee, or their agents, or a political party committee or its agents.
(Sec. 212) Outlines reporting requirements for certain independent expenditures, including the time frame for filing reports with the FEC on independent expenditures aggregating $1,000 or more and $10,000 or more.
(Sec. 213) Prohibits a committee of a political party from making both independent and coordinated expenditures for a general election candidate.
(Sec. 214) Provides that expenditures made by any person (other than a candidate or candidate's authorized committee) in cooperation, consultation, or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a national, State, or local committee of a political party, shall be considered to be contributions made to such party committee.
Repeals current FEC regulations, and directs the FEC to promulgate new regulations on coordinated communications paid for by persons other than candidates, authorized committees of candidates, and party committees. Prohibits such regulations from requiring agreement or formal collaboration to establish coordination.
Title III: Miscellaneous - Amends FECA to codify FEC regulations on permissible uses for contributions and donations, while retaining the ban on the conversion of a contribution or donation to personal use.
(Sec. 302) Revises the ban under the Federal criminal code against solicitation or receipt of campaign contributions by Federal officials and from anyone located in any Federal government building used to discharge official duties. Extends the ban to: (1) specify State and local as well as Federal elections; and (2) cover soft money.
(Sec. 303) Amends FECA to revise the ban on campaign contributions from foreign nationals to include donations, expenditures, independent expenditures, disbursements for an electioneering communication, as well as contributions or donations to any political party committee.
(Sec. 304) Specifies formulae for increasing the limits on individual and political party committee contributions for a Senate candidate whose opponent exceeds the threshold level of spending from personal funds in the campaign, whose basic formula shall be $150,000 plus $0.04 times the voting age population.
Limits repayment of a candidate's personal loans incurred in connection with his or her campaign to $250,000 from contributions made to the candidate or any authorized committee of the candidate after the election.
(Sec. 305) Declares that a candidate for Federal office shall not be entitled to the lowest unit rate broadcast time unless he or she certifies to the broadcast station that the candidate (or any of his or her authorized committees) will not refer directly to another candidate for the same office unless a broadcast ad includes the candidate's photo or image on TV and a statement of the candidate's approval printed for display on TV and spoken by the candidate on radio.
(Sec. 306) Amends FECA to require: (1) the FEC to promulgate standards for and to provide standardized software for filing FEC reports electronically; (2) candidates' use of such software; and (3) the FEC to post any information received electronically on the Internet as soon as practicable.
(Sec. 307) Raises: (1) the limit on aggregate individual contributions to national political party committees from $20,000 to $25,000 per year; (2) the limit on annual aggregate individual contributions to Federal candidates, political action committees (PACs), and parties from $25,000 to $37,500 in the case of contributions to candidates and the authorized committees of candidates, and to $57,500 in the case of any other contributions, of which not more than $37,500 may be attributable to contributions to political committees which are not political committees of national political parties during a specified period; and (3) the special limit on combined contributions to Senate candidates by national and senatorial party committees $17,500 to $35,000 in year of election.
Provides for indexing for inflation of limits on certain contributions and expenditures.
(Sec. 308) Amends Federal law on presidential inaugural ceremonies to require disclosure to the FEC by Presidential Inaugural Committees of any donation made to them in an aggregate amount equal to or greater than $200. Bans foreign national donations to a Presidential Inaugural Committee. Directs the FEC to make any report filed by such a Committee accessible to the public at FEC offices and on the Internet.
(Sec. 309) Amends FECA to prohibit fraudulent misrepresentation in the solicitation of campaign funds.
(Sec. 310) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on statistics for and effects of public financing (clean money clean elections) of the 2000 elections in Arizona and Maine.
(Sec. 311) Amends FECA to require: (1) sponsorship identification on all election-related advertising (including on electioneering communications) by the political committee or other person paying for the communication and the name of any connected organization of the payor; and (2) enhanced visibility or other disclosure of such identification in the communication.
(Sec. 312) Increases criminal penalties for knowing and willful violations involving: (1)
contributions, expenditures, or donations in amounts aggregating from $2,000 to $25,000 per year; (2) contributions, expenditures, or donations in amounts aggregating $25,000 or more per year.
(Sec. 313) Changes from three to five years the statute of limitations for criminal violations of Federal election law.
(Sec. 314) Directs the United States Sentencing Commission to promulgate penalty guidelines and to make legislative or administrative recommendations to Congress regarding enforcement of Federal election law.
(Sec. 315) Imposes specific civil money and criminal penalties for knowing and willful violations of the ban on contributions made in the name of another person (conduit contribution ban).
(Sec. 316) Provides that: (1) for purposes of determining the aggregate amount of expenditures from a candidate's personal funds used in determining the opposition personal funds amount in Senate elections, such aggregate amount shall include the gross receipts advantage of the candidate's authorized committee; and (2) the ban on contributions and donations from foreign nationals does not include U.S. nationals.
(Sec. 318) Prohibits contributions to candidates and donations to political party committees by individuals age 17 or younger.
(Sec. 319) Amends FECA to provide that if the opposition personal funds amount with respect to a candidate for election to Congress exceeds $350,000: (1) the individual contribution limit with respect to the House candidate shall be tripled (from $1,000 to $3,000); (2) the aggregate annual individual contribution limit ($25,000) shall not apply with respect to any contribution made with respect to the candidate if the contribution is made under such increased limit; and (3) the limits on any expenditure by a State or national committee of a political party on behalf of the candidate shall not apply.
Title IV: Severability; Effective Date - Sets forth severability, effective date, and judicial review provisions.
Title V: Additional Disclosure Provisions - Amends FECA to require all designations, statements, reports, and notifications filed with the FEC to be available for public inspection in FEC offices and to be accessible to the public on the Internet within 48 hours after FEC receipt. (Retains the current law requirement that such disclosure materials filed electronically with FEC be accessible to the public on the Internet within 24 hours after FEC receipt).
(Sec. 502) Directs the FEC to maintain a central site on the Internet to make accessible to the public all publicly available election-related reports and information.
(Sec. 503) Amends FECA to require: (1) principal campaign committees of candidates for the House of Representatives or for the Senate to file additional quarterly reports in non-election years; and (2) national committees of a political party to file monthly reports in all years.
(Sec. 504) Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to require a licensee to maintain, and make available for public inspection, records of broadcast time purchase requests by or on behalf candidates, or to communicate message relating to any political matter of national importance.
He could have done that but it would have gotten 15 seconds of coverage one day on the nightly news as opposed to months and months of McCain and the rats calling his veto proof of the Presidents support for corruption, fat cats, and special interests.
Not too good a scenario.
I think I DO see the whole picture... unfortunately too many people (+60 Senators and 1 President) could care less if they SUPPORT a law that CLEARLY violates the constitution if there could possibly be some long term political benefit... You don't see a problem with that????,,,... the SCOTUS stand ready to hear cases that actually have strong arguments on both sides... in this case the law is CLEAR and yet 60 of our Senators voted for something that is UNQUESTIONABLY... ILLEGAL... and now it seems the President will sign it... How disapointing..
But that loophole is big enough to drive an aircraft carrier through. I will bow to your expertise but I also see an attempt here to give state party organizations a lot more freedom from the central control of the National party. That could be very good thing using the recent California primary as an example of out of touch national party meddeling.
Interesting. A group could probably put up a site less than 60 days before an election with a commercial which violates the ban, but not advertise the site on TV under penalty of law.
What a stupid piece of garbage this bill is.
The sooner the Court kills it the better.
I think this is the part Wayne LaPierre is going nuts over that I looked for and missed earlier.
Sec. 213) Prohibits a committee of a political party from making both independent and coordinated expenditures for a general election candidate.
That sounds harmless, but these deals and plans and stuff means there is more than meets the eye. The NRA was in tight with W in the last election. Someone could prove that it was a coordinated expendature.
I'll look more into this tomorrow and this weekend. With the John Dingell/Lynn Rivers, Fred Upton/Dale Shugars and Jim Barcia/Dale Kildee primaries and Rocky/Levin coming up, we may be getting involved in federal races, and I'll have to find out a few things here.
Michigan laws are strict, but at least they are fairly clear.
| AYES | NOES | PRES | NV | |
| REPUBLICAN | 41 | 176 | 5 | |
| DEMOCRATIC | 198 | 12 | 1 | |
| INDEPENDENT | 1 | 1 | ||
| TOTALS | 240 | 189 | 6 |
|
|
||
| Abercrombie | Green (TX) | Napolitano |
| Ackerman | Greenwood | Neal |
| Allen | Grucci | Oberstar |
| Andrews | Gutierrez | Obey |
| Baca | Hall (OH) | Olver |
| Baird | Harman | Ortiz |
| Baldacci | Hastings (FL) | Osborne |
| Baldwin | Hill | Ose |
| Barrett | Hinchey | Owens |
| Bass | Hinojosa | Pallone |
| Becerra | Hoeffel | Pascrell |
| Bentsen | Holden | Pastor |
| Bereuter | Holt | Payne |
| Berkley | Honda | Pelosi |
| Berman | Hooley | Petri |
| Berry | Horn | Phelps |
| Bishop | Houghton | Platts |
| Blagojevich | Hoyer | Pomeroy |
| Blumenauer | Inslee | Price (NC) |
| Boehlert | Israel | Quinn |
| Bonior | Jackson (IL) | Ramstad |
| Bono | Jackson-Lee (TX) | Rangel |
| Borski | Jefferson | Reyes |
| Boswell | John | Rivers |
| Boyd | Johnson (CT) | Rodriguez |
| Brady (PA) | Johnson (IL) | Roemer |
| Brown (FL) | Johnson, E. B. | Ros-Lehtinen |
| Brown (OH) | Jones (OH) | Ross |
| Capito | Kanjorski | Rothman |
| Capps | Kaptur | Roybal-Allard |
| Capuano | Kennedy (RI) | Rush |
| Cardin | Kildee | Sabo |
| Carson (IN) | Kilpatrick | Sanchez |
| Carson (OK) | Kind (WI) | Sanders |
| Castle | Kirk | Sandlin |
| Clay | Kleczka | Sawyer |
| Clayton | Kucinich | Schakowsky |
| Clement | LaFalce | Schiff |
| Clyburn | Lampson | Serrano |
| Condit | Langevin | Shays |
| Conyers | Lantos | Sherman |
| Costello | Larsen (WA) | Simmons |
| Coyne | Larson (CT) | Skelton |
| Cramer | LaTourette | Slaughter |
| Crowley | Leach | Smith (MI) |
| Cummings | Lee | Smith (WA) |
| Davis (CA) | Levin | Snyder |
| Davis (FL) | Lewis (GA) | Solis |
| Davis (IL) | LoBiondo | Spratt |
| DeFazio | Lofgren | Stark |
| DeGette | Lowey | Stenholm |
| Delahunt | Lucas (KY) | Strickland |
| DeLauro | Luther | Stupak |
| Deutsch | Lynch | Tanner |
| Dicks | Maloney (CT) | Tauscher |
| Dingell | Maloney (NY) | Taylor (MS) |
| Doggett | Markey | Thompson (CA) |
| Dooley | Mascara | Thune |
| Doyle | Matheson | Thurman |
| Edwards | Matsui | Tierney |
| Engel | McCarthy (MO) | Towns |
| Eshoo | McCarthy (NY) | Turner |
| Etheridge | McCollum | Udall (CO) |
| Evans | McDermott | Udall (NM) |
| Farr | McGovern | Upton |
| Fattah | McHugh | Velazquez |
| Ferguson | McIntyre | Visclosky |
| Filner | McKinney | Walsh |
| Foley | McNulty | Wamp |
| Ford | Meehan | Waters |
| Frank | Meek (FL) | Watson (CA) |
| Frelinghuysen | Meeks (NY) | Watt (NC) |
| Frost | Menendez | Waxman |
| Ganske | Millender-McDonald | Weiner |
| Gephardt | Miller, George | Weldon (PA) |
| Gilchrest | Mink | Wexler |
| Gilman | Moore | Wolf |
| Gonzalez | Moran (VA) | Woolsey |
| Gordon | Morella | Wu |
| Graham | Nadler | Wynn |
|
|
||
| Aderholt | Goss | Pence |
| Akin | Granger | Peterson (MN) |
| Armey | Graves | Peterson (PA) |
| Bachus | Green (WI) | Pickering |
| Baker | Gutknecht | Pitts |
| Ballenger | Hall (TX) | Pombo |
| Barcia | Hansen | Portman |
| Barr | Hart | Pryce (OH) |
| Bartlett | Hastert | Putnam |
| Barton | Hastings (WA) | Radanovich |
| Biggert | Hayes | Rahall |
| Bilirakis | Hayworth | Regula |
| Blunt | Herger | Rehberg |
| Boehner | Hilleary | Reynolds |
| Bonilla | Hilliard | Rogers (KY) |
| Boozman | Hobson | Rogers (MI) |
| Boucher | Hoekstra | Rohrabacher |
| Brown (SC) | Hostettler | Royce |
| Bryant | Hulshof | Ryan (WI) |
| Burr | Hunter | Ryun (KS) |
| Burton | Hyde | Saxton |
| Buyer | Isakson | Schaffer |
| Callahan | Issa | Schrock |
| Calvert | Istook | Scott |
| Camp | Jenkins | Sensenbrenner |
| Cannon | Johnson, Sam | Sessions |
| Cantor | Jones (NC) | Shadegg |
| Chabot | Keller | Shaw |
| Chambliss | Kelly | Sherwood |
| Coble | Kennedy (MN) | Shimkus |
| Collins | Kerns | Shows |
| Combest | King (NY) | Shuster |
| Cooksey | Kingston | Simpson |
| Cox | Knollenberg | Skeen |
| Crane | Kolbe | Smith (NJ) |
| Crenshaw | LaHood | Smith (TX) |
| Culberson | Largent | Souder |
| Cunningham | Latham | Stearns |
| Davis, Jo Ann | Lewis (CA) | Stump |
| Davis, Tom | Lewis (KY) | Sununu |
| Deal | Linder | Sweeney |
| DeLay | Lipinski | Tancredo |
| DeMint | Lucas (OK) | Tauzin |
| Diaz-Balart | Manzullo | Taylor (NC) |
| Doolittle | McCrery | Terry |
| Dreier | McInnis | Thomas |
| Duncan | McKeon | Thompson (MS) |
| Dunn | Mica | Thornberry |
| Ehlers | Miller, Dan | Tiahrt |
| Ehrlich | Miller, Gary | Tiberi |
| Emerson | Miller, Jeff | Toomey |
| English | Mollohan | Vitter |
| Everett | Moran (KS) | Walden |
| Flake | Murtha | Watkins (OK) |
| Fletcher | Myrick | Watts (OK) |
| Forbes | Nethercutt | Weldon (FL) |
| Fossella | Ney | Weller |
| Gallegly | Northup | Whitfield |
| Gekas | Norwood | Wicker |
| Gibbons | Nussle | Wilson (NM) |
| Gillmor | Otter | Wilson (SC) |
| Goode | Oxley | Young (AK) |
| Goodlatte | Paul | Young (FL) |
|
|
||
| Brady (TX) | Hefley | Roukema |
| Cubin | Riley | Traficant |
Vote Summary |
|
| Vote Number: 64 | Vote Date: April 2, 2001, 05:35 PM |
| Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 27 As Amended) | |
| Required for Majority: 1/2 | Vote Result: Bill Passed |
| Measure Number: S. 27 (Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2001) | |
| Measure Title: A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide bipartisan campaign reform. | |
| Vote Counts: |
|
| Vote Summary | By Senator Name | By Vote Position | By Home State | Return to Vote List |
Alphabetical by Senator Name |
||
| Akaka (D-HI), Yea Allard (R-CO), Nay Allen (R-VA), Nay Baucus (D-MT), Yea Bayh (D-IN), Yea Bennett (R-UT), Nay Biden (D-DE), Yea Bingaman (D-NM), Yea Bond (R-MO), Nay Boxer (D-CA), Yea Breaux (D-LA), Nay Brownback (R-KS), Nay Bunning (R-KY), Nay Burns (R-MT), Nay Byrd (D-WV), Yea Campbell (R-CO), Nay Cantwell (D-WA), Yea Carnahan (D-MO), Yea Carper (D-DE), Yea Chafee (R-RI), Yea Cleland (D-GA), Yea Clinton (D-NY), Yea Cochran (R-MS), Yea Collins (R-ME), Yea Conrad (D-ND), Yea Corzine (D-NJ), Yea Craig (R-ID), Nay Crapo (R-ID), Nay Daschle (D-SD), Yea Dayton (D-MN), Yea DeWine (R-OH), Nay Dodd (D-CT), Yea Domenici (R-NM), Yea Dorgan (D-ND), Yea |
Durbin (D-IL), Yea Edwards (D-NC), Yea Ensign (R-NV), Nay Enzi (R-WY), Nay Feingold (D-WI), Yea Feinstein (D-CA), Yea Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea Frist (R-TN), Nay Graham (D-FL), Yea Gramm (R-TX), Nay Grassley (R-IA), Nay Gregg (R-NH), Nay Hagel (R-NE), Nay Harkin (D-IA), Yea Hatch (R-UT), Nay Helms (R-NC), Nay Hollings (D-SC), Nay Hutchinson (R-AR), Nay Hutchison (R-TX), Nay Inhofe (R-OK), Nay Inouye (D-HI), Yea Jeffords (R-VT), Yea Johnson (D-SD), Yea Kennedy (D-MA), Yea Kerry (D-MA), Yea Kohl (D-WI), Yea Kyl (R-AZ), Nay Landrieu (D-LA), Yea Leahy (D-VT), Yea Levin (D-MI), Yea Lieberman (D-CT), Yea Lincoln (D-AR), Yea Lott (R-MS), Nay Lugar (R-IN), Yea |
McCain (R-AZ), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Nay Mikulski (D-MD), Yea Miller (D-GA), Yea Murkowski (R-AK), Nay Murray (D-WA), Yea Nelson (D-FL), Yea Nelson (D-NE), Nay Nickles (R-OK), Nay Reed (D-RI), Yea Reid (D-NV), Yea Roberts (R-KS), Nay Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea Santorum (R-PA), Nay Sarbanes (D-MD), Yea Schumer (D-NY), Yea Sessions (R-AL), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Nay Smith (R-NH), Nay Smith (R-OR), Nay Snowe (R-ME), Yea Specter (R-PA), Yea Stabenow (D-MI), Yea Stevens (R-AK), Yea Thomas (R-WY), Nay Thompson (R-TN), Yea Thurmond (R-SC), Nay Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea Voinovich (R-OH), Nay Warner (R-VA), Nay Wellstone (D-MN), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Yea |
| Vote Summary | By Senator Name | By Vote Position | By Home State | Return to Vote List |
Grouped By Vote Position |
||
| YEAs --- 59 | ||
| Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Carnahan (D-MO) Carper (D-DE) Chafee (R-RI) Cleland (D-GA) Clinton (D-NY) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Corzine (D-NJ) Daschle (D-SD) Dayton (D-MN) Dodd (D-CT) |
Domenici (R-NM) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Edwards (D-NC) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Fitzgerald (R-IL) Graham (D-FL) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (R-VT) Johnson (D-SD) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) |
Lugar (R-IN) McCain (R-AZ) Mikulski (D-MD) Miller (D-GA) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Stevens (R-AK) Thompson (R-TN) Torricelli (D-NJ) Wellstone (D-MN) Wyden (D-OR) |
| NAYs --- 41 | ||
| Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Breaux (D-LA) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Campbell (R-CO) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) DeWine (R-OH) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) |
Frist (R-TN) Gramm (R-TX) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Hatch (R-UT) Helms (R-NC) Hollings (D-SC) Hutchinson (R-AR) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Kyl (R-AZ) Lott (R-MS) McConnell (R-KY) |
Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-NE) Nickles (R-OK) Roberts (R-KS) Santorum (R-PA) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-NH) Smith (R-OR) Thomas (R-WY) Thurmond (R-SC) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA) |
| Vote Summary | By Senator Name | By Vote Position | By Home State | Return to Vote List |
Grouped by Home State |
||
| Alabama: | Shelby (R), Nay | Sessions (R), Nay |
| Alaska: | Stevens (R), Yea | Murkowski (R), Nay |
| Arizona: | McCain (R), Yea | Kyl (R), Nay |
| Arkansas: | Hutchinson (R), Nay | Lincoln (D), Yea |
| California: | Feinstein (D), Yea | Boxer (D), Yea |
| Colorado: | Campbell (R), Nay | Allard (R), Nay |
| Connecticut: | Dodd (D), Yea | Lieberman (D), Yea |
| Delaware: | Biden (D), Yea | Carper (D), Yea |
| Florida: | Graham (D), Yea | Nelson (D), Yea |
| Georgia: | Cleland (D), Yea | Miller (D), Yea |
| Hawaii: | Inouye (D), Yea | Akaka (D), Yea |
| Idaho: | Craig (R), Nay | Crapo (R), Nay |
| Illinois: | Durbin (D), Yea | Fitzgerald (R), Yea |
| Indiana: | Lugar (R), Yea | Bayh (D), Yea |
| Iowa: | Grassley (R), Nay | Harkin (D), Yea |
| Kansas: | Brownback (R), Nay | Roberts (R), Nay |
| Kentucky: | McConnell (R), Nay | Bunning (R), Nay |
| Louisiana: | Breaux (D), Nay | Landrieu (D), Yea |
| Maine: | Snowe (R), Yea | Collins (R), Yea |
| Maryland: | Sarbanes (D), Yea | Mikulski (D), Yea |
| Massachusetts: | Kennedy (D), Yea | Kerry (D), Yea |
| Michigan: | Levin (D), Yea | Stabenow (D), Yea |
| Minnesota: | Wellstone (D), Yea | Dayton (D), Yea |
| Mississippi: | Cochran (R), Yea | Lott (R), Nay |
| Missouri: | Bond (R), Nay | Carnahan (D), Yea |
| Montana: | Baucus (D), Yea | Burns (R), Nay |
| Nebraska: | Hagel (R), Nay | Nelson (D), Nay |
| Nevada: | Reid (D), Yea | Ensign (R), Nay |
| New Hampshire: | Smith (R), Nay | Gregg (R), Nay |
| New Jersey: | Torricelli (D), Yea | Corzine (D), Yea |
| New Mexico: | Domenici (R), Yea | Bingaman (D), Yea |
| New York: | Schumer (D), Yea | Clinton (D), Yea |
| North Carolina: | Helms (R), Nay | Edwards (D), Yea |
| North Dakota: | Conrad (D), Yea | Dorgan (D), Yea |
| Ohio: | DeWine (R), Nay | Voinovich (R), Nay |
| Oklahoma: | Nickles (R), Nay | Inhofe (R), Nay |
| Oregon: | Wyden (D), Yea | Smith (R), Nay |
| Pennsylvania: | Specter (R), Yea | Santorum (R), Nay |
| Rhode Island: | Reed (D), Yea | Chafee (R), Yea |
| South Carolina: | Thurmond (R), Nay | Hollings (D), Nay |
| South Dakota: | Daschle (D), Yea | Johnson (D), Yea |
| Tennessee: | Thompson (R), Yea | Frist (R), Nay |
| Texas: | Gramm (R), Nay | Hutchison (R), Nay |
| Utah: | Hatch (R), Nay | Bennett (R), Nay |
| Vermont: | Leahy (D), Yea | Jeffords (R), Yea |
| Virginia: | Warner (R), Nay | Allen (R), Nay |
| Washington: | Murray (D), Yea | Cantwell (D), Yea |
| West Virginia: | Byrd (D), Yea | Rockefeller (D), Yea |
| Wisconsin: | Kohl (D), Yea | Feingold (D), Yea |
| Wyoming: | Thomas (R), Nay | Enzi (R), Nay |
| Vote Summary | By Senator Name | By Vote Position | By Home State | Return to Vote List |
Sorry. I may have overreacted. But I still disagree.
There are SOME young people who I believe would be very good choosers when it comes to donations....but the majority would not. They can volunteer their services. When they are completely on their own, then they can choose and willingly donate their money (not their side job money - their hard earned salary with which they support themselves.) Don't take it personally.
Most adults can't make political decisions, or even personal decisions, very well. Look at the 2000 presidential election, or the state of California, or just about any news thread on this site for evidence. But that's entirely beside the point.
A person should be able to choose how they want to spend their money on their own. That's what freedom is all about. To suggest otherwise is- well, to be quite blunt- unAmerican. Nor does it matter how that person gets their money (other than theft, of course). If it did, then I could easily claim that a housewife, or a pensioner, or someone living off an inheritance shouldn't be able to donate to political campaigns. Really, what is the harm in letting a young person donate to a political cause, other than the fact that the money may go to a person or organization you don't like?
P.S. My interest in this topic is entirely philosophical. This particular provision of CFR doesn't affect me.
It was a "hold the nose" vote for me, all truth be told. I'm not real big on the Bush Family as it is, but the alternatives were even more frightening than Dubya. Although, that Dictator comment he made after the election made me really wonder. Now in hindsight (The Patriot Act, the Drapes on the Statues, CFR, Amnesty for Illegals, the Stem Cell thing, the Gaffs, etc) I'm starting to wish that each vote came with a four year warranty, and a no questions asked return policy.
As for who I'll vote for in 2004, hmmmmmm. Good Question.
How about this, Anybody But Bush. Or maybe that Guinea Pig from the Blockbuster Commercials. At least he can get all his lines out without screwing them up.
Thanks for the ping and a bump to keep it up top
That's a stretch. Who's to say the Supremes WILL rule that way,or that they will even agree to review it?
Nope,Bubba-2 needs the guts to stand up on his hind legs and say,"I will NOT sign any bills that create un-Constitutional laws." There is no excuse for him saying he is going to sign it anyhow,despite some un-Constitutional aspects,other than he wants the law. None.
Rudy Giuliani for President!!
You want a pro-abort gun grabber as president?
Sad but true.
Yes, its painful for all of us to lose a battle but we have to dust off our hurt, anger and disappointment and continue to fight the war for freedom til it is won.
Absolutely! I know this will sound quite ironic now, but ...
Let's roll!
WEB RESULTS (Showing Results 1 - 10 of more than 200 ) next »
Get the Top 10 websites for "us term limits"
1.
US Term Limits
Browse a collection of articles and news updates about term limits. Find details on different state regulations and national proposals.
3/8/2002 http://www.termlimits.org/
Those little tinpot potentates in congress and the senate ( deliberate no-caps ) may think they have pulled a fast one on a sleeping citizenry. Maybe they are right, but I'm going to try to prove them wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.