[gore3000]

Guess the skull is just a figment of imagination?

First of all, it is not a skull, it is half a skull. To posit that from this half skull we can "prove" not only that this is a man, but that it was our ancestor, not only that it was our ancestor, but that it proves the truth of evolution, not only that but that it proves that the Bible is not true, not just that, but that it proves the entire atheistic theory of life, the universe and everything - is pure hogwash. The extravagance of the claims made by evolutionists on the minutest of evidence render the whole theory a joke and amply prove that there is nothing scientific about evolution.

[oldcats]

To posit that from this half skull we can "prove" not only that this is a man, but that it was our ancestor, not only that it was our ancestor,
Well you see my friend...the first problem that I have with your replyis...Are you a trained anthropolgist? If not, how can you be so darn sure that certain facts cannot be assertained from a half skull? Do you know the differences and shapes of a human versus ape-ancestor skull to be able to tell them apart?

Then you head off into a rant...the good ole...if this-then that-then that-then rant....The scientists are not saying that...you are putting words into their mouth. It is YOU that is making extravagant claims.
Next you speak of minutest of evidence...Just what evidence do you have to support your belief in creationism...and I am asking for hard, physical evidence...not the rants and ramblings of so-calledb Biblical "scholars". You ask for hard physical proof...are you prepared to give some of your own? I will gladly look at it with the same critical eye that you turned on this.
I think any evidence beats no evidence.
Oldcats