Let's see PRND21 answers just how I'm violating his "free speech" by pointing out his disruptive tactics on other threads, where he poses this same question, refuses to acknoledge that he's been answered, then leaves for another thread to repeat the process.
He can't answer a question, much less read the answer to his own.
From PRND21
Received 2002-03-22 22:30:46
You should be ashamed. If you can't answer the simplest of questions...shut up!
Poor PRND21. He's demonstrated repeatedly on multiple threads that he can't comprehend simple, concise answers to the same question that he's posted on at least 10 threads now. When he/she/IT is busted on their disruptive tactics, he/she/IT has to resort to sending an email telling someone to SHUT UP! Wow. I'm so not impressed by the "intelligence" and "wit" that is on display by this user.
So to answer your question for the last time, PRND21, CFR restricts *my* personal ability to take out an issue or candidate advocay ad within 60 days of an election. Whether that ad is radio, tv, or print, it will become ILLEGAL for me to spend MY OWN MONEY to speak out against a candidate in the media, 60 days prior to an election. It will also be illegal for advocacy groups such as the NRA/GOA and several Pro-LIFE groups that I belong to, to do the same. 60 Days before an election is *precisely* when the public needs to be made aware of a candidate's stand on the issues. But you continue to fail to see such a simple, basic point.
Why YOU continue to fail to comprehend these simple facts when presented, I guess only your Special Ed teacher knows.
Now, go back to DU where you belong. You've been fully exposed for the emotional, disruptive liberal poster that you are.