Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pt17
The thing(s) that should keep you in academia should be the rewards of teaching, both monetary and psychological, . . .

Tenure is a benefit which has an "opportunity cost". For me, it has a specific value. It is calculated as part of salary in determining whether a job is beneficial.

Also, being in academia has little to do with teaching. The game is scholarly research. Maybe not at this small Texas college, but at most medium to large Universities, it is THE determining factor.

If job performace were tied only to teaching, I wouldn't concern myself at all with it. Teaching is easy.

As far as potentially having to move if you get laid off,

There aren't "lay offs" in academia as such. The department, for example, could decide that they will go into an entirely different field of research because it's "hot" now. They could fire virtually the whole faculty (if no tenure) and start anew.

This would have nothing whatsoever to do with job performance or self-induced insecurities. Now, if a University wanted to have such a possibility exist, that's fine, but they're going to have to pay me a lot more to get myself into such a situation.

61 posted on 03/24/2002 6:08:25 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude
Also, being in academia has little to do with teaching.

Some might see that as a problem.
69 posted on 03/24/2002 6:44:11 AM PST by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude
If they had to pay more money perhaps one would not see such rediculous cirricula as we have now. I am not talking about you, Amish.
77 posted on 03/24/2002 7:16:17 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson