I think you've reduced the falsehood charges to a perfect and lucid fromula here:
One2many writes, with my clarifications and numbers in brackets,:
1] "In virtually every one of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, Lincoln made it a point to champion this corrupt economic agenda."
2] Obviously "revealed his single-minded devotion to the corrupt Whig economic agenda" is very much NOT the same thing as: 1] " [in the debates] made it a point to champion this corrupt economic agenda" don't you agree?
And you reply, with a few insertions from me ...
Well, yes, these two completely unsubstantiated and false statements are different. One [#1 above]is a false instance supporting the [other, #2 above, which is a] false general claim.
The is the summation for the prosecution.
Comments, anyone?
Richard F.
FR fatigue must be setting in.
I meant to type, This is the summation etc.
Better quit for Maundy Thursday family and church activities.
Best to all, and see you tomorrow or Saturday,
Richard F.