[davidjquackenbush]

It would be refreshing if for once a request for factual judgment on one of DiLorenzo's claims would be met with a comment on the facts, or even with a fact, instead of insult and unprovable assertions about motives.

[Aurelius]

"It would be refreshing if for once a request for factual judgment on one of DiLorenzo's claims would be met with a comment on the facts, or even with a fact, instead of insult and unprovable assertions about motives."

Well, now that the book is available, neither side should have an excuse for not backing up their case with facts, should they. I've been following this debate for some time now and it is not my impression that your side has been lacking in diligence in the use of insults and ad hominem attacks.

[Aurelius]

Okay you guys, a little less than 20 minutes ago, about 3:20 central time, I received my copy of DiLorenzo's book. Now, perhaps, we will have a moment of truth. We will see who is supported by the facts and who is not. We will see who is able to acknowledge that they were wrong, if they were, and who is unable to do that. I say, let the cards fall where they may. I will be interested to see who of you are really with me on that.