[shrinkermd]

What no picture of the CFR signing, passing out of pens, Senators and Congressman with smiles. Oh well, I guess when you betray those who voted for you, you don't celebrate.

[petuniasevan]

Why don't you go to a thread where your gripe will be appreciated?

[WVNan]

Go away. This is not the thread for those kinds of comments.

[rintense]

That makes two...

[mtngrl@vrwc]

Reply #10 should have been directed to you too. So I repeat myself:

This thread is a place to view pictures that were taken to keep us up to date with what is going on in President Bush's life. It's not a place to rant about your favorite pet peeve. There are other threads set up for this purpose. Go find one!

[CyberAnt]

Excuse me - who would be at the signing - McCain! Do you actually think he's going to give McCain a platform. This CFR thing means McCain is no longer relevant. That suits me just fine. The court will take care of the missteps in the law's provisions and the President will have stilled McCain's voice - hooooooray!!

[Miss Marple]

I guess when you really want to stick it to McCain, you sign the bill on the way to SOUTH CAROLINA and then have a staffer call McCain's aide and tell him you signed it.

I guess when you want to get MEANINGFUL CFR you avoid the obvious veto bait and keep the issue out of the dem's hands, so that hopefully you can get a Senate elected and some JUDGES appointed.

I guess when you are running a WAR you don't have time for this stuff that is nothing more than petty political junk. Instead, you get the bill where the SC can decide it.

Now go to one of the many Bush-bashing threads.

[Kath]

Get lost, take it somewhere else.

[Salvation]

What no picture of the CFR signing, passing out of pens, Senators and Congressman with smiles. Oh well, I guess when you betray those who voted for you, you don't celebrate.

I heard on Fox that he signed it in private (maybe some presidential staffers there) as he was walking out of the White House. Hahahaha to McCain, Feingold, Shays and Meehan!

[d14truth]

I wish the House and Senate majorities who claim to represent the 'majority' in the country would receive half the 'heat' the President gets on this issue. If the people we elect to represent us, don't represent us, who's the FOOL? Certainly not the President. How can a Congress, sworn to uphold the Constitution, pass unconstitutional measures? It is the function of the judiciary to determine constitutionality, which will happen. The President 'lobbied' from his 'bully pulpit' that this bill not be passed because it was a 'bad' bill, in his opinion. The representatives of the people disagreed. If the Court finds it unconstitutional, will we re-elect the same representatives? If so, shame and misfortune be upon us. We, the people, are to deal with the 'LEGISLATIVE PROBLEMS'.