Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senior Citizen Activist Jailed For Internet Rant
Newsbytes via Rense ^ | Michael Bartlett

Posted on 03/30/2002 11:15:01 AM PST by Sir Gawain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2002 11:15:01 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: victoria delsoul; nunya bidness; tpaine; owk; madameaxe; mercuria; aaabest; free vulcan; loopy...
-
2 posted on 03/30/2002 11:16:48 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I wonder who the judge is in bed with? Council House or somebody connected must be buying the judge a lot of steak dinners or supplying him with coke.
3 posted on 03/30/2002 11:19:29 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Is this another nail in the coffin of the 1st amendment?
4 posted on 03/30/2002 11:21:01 AM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Sir Gawain
Where is the ACLU ???
6 posted on 03/30/2002 11:23:11 AM PST by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
1st-4th and other facets.

And Habeus Corpus can be a joke with a selfish enough judge. We are at the mercy of these self-righteous thugs anymore and the lackeys at the PDs. To think everything I so admired about my country as a school kid turns out to be spit upon by these bad apples and helps set morally wrong precedent is sad. This judge should be ashamed. 1984 is right around the corner-oops its here.

7 posted on 03/30/2002 11:35:49 AM PST by 101st-Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
This is the World Wide Web ... we could all be A+Bert. No, we couldn't.

This week, Trummel tested positive for tuberculosis, Siegel added

SURPRISE! TB??? Isn't that a sticky wicket ... nice, nothing better than a foreign national with TB.

8 posted on 03/30/2002 11:41:56 AM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 101st-Eagle
I was reading a law review last night on the 2nd Amendment at one of the law school sites. On line in particular really caught my attention.

"Rarely do we focus predominantly on the text, on original meaning, on tradition, on constitutional structure, on claims of changed circumstances, and on other forms of interpretive argument. 3 We know that in reality, to practicing lawyers, the Constitution is indeed what the Court says it is. And influenced by this reality, we mostly teach and critique the Court's pronouncements."

I found this particularly interesting in light of the fact of all the rants I see here on FR as to what the Constitution means.

9 posted on 03/30/2002 11:44:15 AM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour;connectthedots
A+Bert? I didn't think he was so young.....

No, this is CTD territory.

10 posted on 03/30/2002 11:44:18 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Always remember, you cannot bash HUD!

That judge seemed to be a little one-sided..oops, is he going to put out a restraining order against me?

11 posted on 03/30/2002 11:48:04 AM PST by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Interesting quotation. Do you have title, publisher, etc.? Thanks!

Carolyn

12 posted on 03/30/2002 12:07:02 PM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
"Interesting quotation. Do you have title, publisher, etc.? Thanks!"

Yes, it is just a professor's outline of a law school course in Constitutional law, But it can be found here.

And yes I am aware that it comes from the UCLA law school, which is not generally thought to be a bastion of conservative thought, but it still pretty much says the same thing that every attorney I have ever talked to says about Constitutional law.

13 posted on 03/30/2002 12:18:42 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Thank you! Very scary stuff, IMO!

Carolyn

14 posted on 03/30/2002 12:27:47 PM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CDHart
"Very scary stuff, IMO!"

Not really. I suppose you have to ask the question that ok, if they courts should not interpret the Constitution and decides what it means, then who should.

Anyway, I found it to be an interesting read and presents some interesting points.

15 posted on 03/30/2002 12:36:48 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 101st-Eagle
"To think everything I so admired about my country as a school kid turns out to be spit upon by these bad apples and helps set morally wrong precedent is sad. "

Yes, but keep in mind that it didn't happen overnight, so it can't be fixed overnight. But I am still an optimist. I still think it can be fixed.

16 posted on 03/30/2002 12:44:31 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Kerberos
I swear when I first saw this headline I thought it was a joke about the new format.
18 posted on 03/30/2002 2:21:43 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
"I swear when I first saw this headline I thought it was a joke about the new format."

LOL. Yes there have been a few posts recently from the onion.com, which has tripped some people up.

However I am not really familiar with newsbytes, but with every other encroachment the government has been doing it does not surprise me.

19 posted on 03/30/2002 2:28:57 PM PST by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I wonder who the judge is in bed with?

Probably owns stock in the company. What a sorry excuse for a judge.
20 posted on 03/30/2002 2:36:43 PM PST by CharlieDarwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson