Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alaskanfan
Thanks for the bump. I think it's a poor PR move by the Bush Administration, but then they aren't worrying much about how many scientists are going to vote for them, I think.

The main reason that it's bad PR is that it comes right on the heels of the released documents showing how much influence industry had on the crafting of the energy policy and how little influence environmental groups had. But the environment and even energy is not a hot-button issue right now, despite the current Mideast turmoil.

40 posted on 04/03/2002 8:23:13 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
The main reason that it's bad PR is that it comes right on the heels of the released documents showing how much influence industry had on the crafting of the energy policy and how little influence environmental groups had.

That's funny, I read that the environmentalists were invited but refused to attend. I suppose that we should rely on the opinions of Hollywood stars in the crafting of our energy policy rather than anyone that is actually in the energy industry?

42 posted on 04/03/2002 9:16:20 AM PST by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson