Posted on 04/03/2002 3:00:44 PM PST by rohry
Market WrapUp for the Week Wednesday's Stock Market WrapUp A Crisis of Confidence Like so many myths, the reported profit miracle of the 1990s is now turning out to be a mirage as more companies confess their sins of earnings manipulation. Ever since the Enron scandal and the advent of a bear market, the investment public, and belatedly the government, is now starting to pay attention to the way profits are reported. What has been discovered is over 30% of exchange listed companies are now suspect of manipulating their earnings. The greatest way to track this discrepancy between what companies report to the public and what is parroted by the boobheads on networks, is earnings differ greatly from what is reported as actual cash from operations. Under most normal circumstances the two numbers, earnings and cash flow from operations, should be in sync. We have many large well-known companies from GM, AOL, Intel, to IBM reporting one figure as pro forma income or profit, and another figure as net income according to GAAP. At one time the U.S. accounting system was considered to be the standard that all other countries aspired to. This is no longer the case. With stock options as the main form of compensation for top executives, top management created incentives for itself to manipulate earnings in an effort to move stock prices higher. The abuses that were created through the issuance of stock options are now making front page headlines in the financial press. It is widespread practice to put top management at odds with shareholders. This, I believe, is partially responsible for many of the abuses seen today. Weve seen top executives, such as Disneys Michael Eisner, receive a salary of $5.7 million and additional compensation in the form of stock options worth $569 million, almost one-third of Disneys income in the year they were issued. Abuse of Stock Options It would be one thing if all investors had to contend with was corporate earnings. While the financial press and Washington are caught up with monitoring the books of corporations, no one is monitoring the governments books. When it comes to economic numbers, the governments books can be just as manipulative. For example, we now find ourselves having to increase the national debt limits again after raising the limits by half a trillion back in 1997. For the last five years all you have heard is the government was running a surplus. How can a government run a surplus when its outstanding debt has increased by $500 billion over that same period of time? We are now talking about increasing the national debt limit by $750 billion when, in fact, we are still talking about surpluses over this next decade. Unemployment These unadjusted numbers paint a different picture of the economy from the numbers widely reported in the financial press. Its the same for the GDP numbers, which are statistically massaged. The growth rate in GDP during the fourth quarter was entirely due to government spending. The private sector of the economy actually contracted. The point that should be made is the unadjusted unemployment numbers reflect more of what is actually going on in the economy and line up better with what companies are doing to their payrolls. What investors need to understand looking at the financial markets or the economy is that there are several sets of books to look at if you want to find out the real story. What is given out for public consumption isnt the same information insiders are using to make key investment decisions. If you want to play against the big boys, you better be using the same information if you hope to compete and win. SEC Probes Earnings Numbers Middle East Tension It has been difficult for investors to focus on anything else except war, profit losses or accounting scandals, none of which are confidence builders. The media has been unable to explain the war or the conflict in a way that makes it understandable. The media wants more diplomacy, but diplomacy hasnt worked for the last decade. We are now seeing what Karl von Clausewitz once called the true nature of war which is, "War is nothing but the continuation of policy with other means." War can be either limited or absolute, depending on the grand strategy of the state. Total victory can only be achieved through attack. Arafat began the attacks in September of 2000. Now he faces Israels response. The Israelis now realize the best diplomacy is on the battlefield and not at the negotiating table. It is only when one side loses that it is most willing to negotiate. This understanding of war and politics is misunderstood by the media. A much larger battle is just around the corner with the approaching attack against the terrorist state of Saddam Hussein. The U.S. is rapidly building up its presence in the Gulf in preparation for war. This is one of the reasons why the markets are so unsettled. In times of war, anything is possible because there are so many unknowns. It is this uncertainty that weighs on the markets. The markets fell for the fourth consecutive day as earnings warnings and Middle East tensions spurred a selling exodus out of stocks. There was no refuge anywhere today, not even in gold or oil. Just about every sector saw red. The Dow lost 115 points with only three out of the Dows 30 stocks rising. The technology sector is imploding with software stocks getting hammered for the third straight day after profit warnings came from key companies. Goldman Sachs upgrade of its earnings forecast failed to inspire investors. Goldman Sachs estimates are adjusted for depreciation and inventory adjustments. Volume was once again light with 1.2 million shares on the NYSE and 1.72 billion shares trading on the Nasdaq. Market breadth has been steadily falling and was negative today by 20 to 12 on the NYSE and by 21 to 14 on the Nasdaq. Treasury Market Overseas Market Japan's Nikkei 225 stock average rose as public pension funds began using 1.7 trillion yen ($12.8 billion) in money allotted this year to buy Kyocera Corp. and other companies with large weightings. The Nikkei rose 1.8% to 11,400.71, erasing an earlier 1.5% loss sparked by a drop in the Nasdaq Composite Index. © Copyright, Jim Puplava, April 3, 2002 |
The unadjusted unemployment rate was 6.1% instead of the widely reported 5.5%.
The growth rate in GDP during the fourth quarter was entirely due to government spending. The private sector of the economy actually contracted.
In other news I agree with you on GWB's policy in Iraq/Israel:
While I understand your view, Rummy is also dealing with the reality of force requirements.....IMHO, this is another sign that we're heading for Bagdad real soon, and we're going in alone, and a lot of planes will be needed.....What's interesting is which countries have agreed to help..the ones that are not part of the EU......
The leadership in Iraq can be taken out in a few weeks. The Israelies will take out the terrorists and isolate Palestinian extremeists. The Democrats will be stunned (ENGAGEMENT...NOT).
Iraqi leadership + WMD + Iraqi oil fields
Iraqi oil field is a key to appease Turks and Kurds together. And driving down high oil price, the result of war jitter. But I fear that they are all booby-trapped.
I learned about this in a casino. It's called "doubling down".
Yep, that about says it all. I believe little coming out of either Wall Steet or Washington. These guys are writing fiction and trying to buy time.
Richard W.
g-e.com is a relatively un-discovered treasure right now, even as the million-hit marks (or whatever Dr V comments on now and again) are dropping like flies. Before this is all over, I look for that site to be sabotaged in some way. Far too much microscopic analyzing of the naked emperor for the emperor to remain disinterested.
Prubear and DR are also both great sites. They, along with g-e, are all a curious person needs to learn essential defensive financial (and life-in-general) plays. But, as you alluded, you've got to have a pretty strong stomach for reality to frequent those places. Coming to terms with both "You only live once" and "No one lives forever" are imperative.
I've found it interesting that these Puplava posts on FR don't get any more attention than they do. The reasons that they do not are probably the same reasons I spend more time at the three sites you mentioned, versus FR, these days.
I ascribe it to our sorry state of our educational system. The percentage of "conservatives" and even "libertarians that believe that:
1. The Fed is a legal and proper institution
2. Fiat money is proper and historical
3. Keneseyian Economics is "normal" and not a "third way" a la Clinton and Blair
is absolutely astounding.
On social issues it's much easier to be "conservative" than on complex economic issues because the former are instilled by parents, churches and institutions like the Boy Scouts, whereas Economics are only learned in classrooms or voracious self-education.
For example, I was a libertarian for over 20 years and still read and believed Keynesian or Friedman-style economic theories (not really conservative by my book). It wasn't until I started reading the Austrian economists that I became a true conservative/libertarian.
Me too. It doesn't surprise me that these threads don't get more attention. Let's just be happy we're not getting flamed, which was the case about 18 months ago when posting things like this. I think Enron woke up the masses. I find it ironic that so many on FR complain about the sheeple mentality and yet follow the sheeple party line when it comes to economic matters.
There are too many to mention, but go to Mises Institute.
There you will find electronic books and articles that you can download or order. I prefer stuff by Murray Rothbard...he is very readable. von Mises is the giant of the school but some of his stuff is over my head.
I got flamed quite often when I first started posting in January. My policy is to respond once to their rants then I ignore them. They haven't bothered me lately.
Oh, and by the way, I made quite a lot off of the market during the 90's, and sold off everything by August 2000. Doing well, thank you. So I'm not just some ranting loser, I'm a seasoned investor who has made money in both short and long positions, and I've arrived at the conclusion that I just don't want to play the stock market game anymore. It's just not possible to sort out the truth from the lies, there are no rules, there is no "controlling legal authority", and if you lose your shirt you only get to make some lawyer rich in a shareholder lawsuit. I'm keeping my money in the bank. The market can kiss my posterior.
Richard W.
Many champions of Bull market claims they are also champions of capitalism. Not necessarily, boom became their idol. they want to sustain it as long as possible. After all, it is their utopia, which is to be sustained forever. Economic agents' minds stopped working rationally. The vaunted invisible hand are no longer effective in stock markets, etc. Now they want Fed or government to intervene in any way possible to save bubbles. Is this a capitalist way ? It is more like corporatism.
So, if it helps, here's a bump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.