Is the International Red Cross a terrorist-supporting organization?

Instapundit ^ | April 4, 2002 | Thud

[Thud]

Thursday, April 04, 2002
Posted 4/4/2002 10:43:17 AM by Glenn Reynolds

INSTAPUNDIT HAS SPIES EVERYWHERE, and one of my moles at the ICRC sends this interesting report. As with all intelligence (er, or journalism) it cannot be guaranteed reliable, but this informant has been accurate in the past and his/her emails contain other evidence of accuracy:

I thought I'd write you again to update you on the latest from the International Red Cross here in Geneva. I recently read the piece in the New York Times about the legality of Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and Golan Heights in which the author claimed that the occupation, contrary to what the UN was saying, was indeed legal since no peace agreement had yet been reached. From what I can tell, this is more or less the concensus among experts, except here at the UN and the Red Cross where anti-Israeli sentiment is part of the initiation course.

Anyhow, more so than the prisoners at Gitmo, the Israeli/Palestinian situation shows how biased the Red Cross is. Apart from anti-semitic e-mails floating around and the rather odd habit the Red Cross has of providing Palestinians with assistance that goes far beyond anything given to any other group anywhere else in the world (we provide Palestinians with jogging suits, t-shirts, running shoes and school backpacks, while Eritreans and Ethiopians who are in much worse shape get peas and cooking oil) [Emphasis added], the most interesting thing is the situation regarding the Palestinian Red Crescent and the ambulances funded by the International Red Cross. You might have seen recently that one of the ambulances was stopped and searched by the Israeli Defense Force which found explosives under a stretcher carrying a three-year old boy. There have also been instances where Palestinians have used ambulances for cover from the IDF.

The interesting point is that the issue of the IDF stopping ambulances and searching them is the one thing over which the Red Cross makes the biggest fuss. We're constantly giving the Israelis hell for doing it, saying they're contravening the Geneva Conventions and all that sort of thing. However, when the explosives were discovered in the ambulance recently, the ICRC had to admit that this was a problem. But in its statement regarding the discovery, the Red Cross still denounced Israel for stopping ambulances.

If this wasn't bad enough, the Red Cross knew all along that the Palestinians were using the ambulances to transport weapons, but were refusing to admit it until the recent revelations forced them to. . . . When it came time to write the final report on the operation, there were already allegations regarding the use of the ambulances to transport weapons and Palestinian fighters, but the Red Cross claimed there was no proof and ignored the complaints. The Red Cross wanted to sweep the whole thing under the carpet because the organization is highly anti-Israel. In effect, the Red Cross was assisting the Palestinians against the Israelis in clear contravention of the Geneva Conventions, while simultaneously accusing the Israelis of going against the Conventions by stopping the ambulances for inspections in the first place. [Emphasis added].

I can't say much about this now, but I do plan to write something about it when I leave the ICRC in the next year or so. However, someone else could write about it and start asking some questions.

Well, here's a heads-up for any investigative journalists interested in the Red Cross. Tally ho!

[Thud]

It will be interesting to learn whether the U.S. government designates the International Red Cross a terrorist-supporting organization if it does to us what it iseems to be doing to the Israelis.

[Thud]

ping

[pax_et_bonum]

ping

[rmlew]

Let's not forget that bowing to Arab pressure, the IRC refuses to let the Red Magen David in.

[INSENSITIVE GUY]

Where ever the U.S.or U.S.MILITARY has control,the Red Cross should routinely be denied access.They run to the media and try to turn sentiment against us!

[prophetic]

Since their money grubbing has been exposed I no longer call them the Red Cross.
I now call them 'The Communist Red Plus Sign'

[Ethan_Allen]

It will be interesting to learn whether the U.S. government designates the International Red Cross a terrorist-supporting organization if it does to us what it seems to be doing to the Israelis.

When the flap started about the Red Cross and the money it tried to abscond with, money donated for the victims of 9-11, I coincidentally ran across an old article about government agencies, such as FEMA, that would leap into action following a national emergency. Along with the usual agencies one would expect, such as FEMA, Dept. of Defense, etc., the Red Cross was curiously listed as a federal agency. I believe they probably are, clandestinely. Depending on what you think of your current government, you should have your answer to the above question.