Posted on 04/09/2002 11:08:31 AM PDT by scratchgolfer
Israel no longer dependent on U.S. military assistance
By David Wood
Newhouse News Service
WASHINGTON — There was a time when the United States was the unquestioned military superpower in the Middle East and drew obedient if grudging respect from all sides. No more.
Now Israel is the region's superpower, and where it once looked to the United States not just for diplomatic support but also for military rescue, now Israel can thumb its nose at Washington and go its own way.
Israel can field 19 divisions of ground troops, by some counts; the United States boasts 13 divisions worldwide and would need weeks to move any significant military force into the region.
Israel's air force, which flies souped-up U.S. F-15 and F-16 fighters, can generate nearly 3,000 sorties, or combat missions, per day. The United States can sustain about 1,600 sorties a day. That kind of combat punch has given Israel unprecedented freedom of action, not just against lightly armed Palestinian street fighters, but against its traditional enemies of Syria and Egypt as well.
"We have created an 800-pound gorilla," said Kenneth Brower, an independent military consultant in Washington, assessing decades of U.S. military aid to Israel.
Yesterday, the 11th day of its invasion of Palestinian territories, Israel initially shrugged off U.S. demands that it begin withdrawing "without delay," as President Bush put it. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said in a speech to the Knesset in Jerusalem that "the army will continue operating as quickly as possible until the mission has been completed."
Later, Sharon relented — somewhat. He withdrew from two West Bank cities as his government claimed military success.
The United States has given Israel about $3 billion a year for weapons purchases since the late 1970s, and has transferred new or used weapons and military technology for free or at deeply discounted prices under other government programs and commercial arrangements.
The United States also has stored millions of dollars' worth of ammunition, fuel and spare parts and even built a field hospital in Israel, ostensibly for use by American forces. The agreements under which the equipment was stored in Israel are secret, but most analysts assume Israel has access to the storage sites.
"It's always been said there are 'tripwires' that would permit Israel to use that stuff," said Shoshana Bryen, an analyst for the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a think tank in Washington.
The increase in Israel's combat clout comes less from size than from other, intangible factors. For instance, Israeli technicians have added digital and other improvements to their F-16 fighters, making them even more capable than versions used by the U.S. Air Force, Brower said.
And Israel can fly so many combat sorties per day because it has a huge pool of seasoned combat pilots. That enables its air force to use one aircraft again and again during a 24-hour period while exchanging fatigued pilots for fresh ones. The United States does not maintain as many combat pilots per airplane as Israel.
Israel relies heavily on its reserve forces. There are almost 1 million Israelis under the age of 48 liable to be recalled to duty. All have done three years' active duty as well as reserve training. Reserve troops are organized into units already matched up with vehicles and weapons.
"It's one of the most efficient military forces around," said Anthony Cordesman, a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "Can they thumb their nose at us? Well, for a while. But they don't have the technical or production base to sustain these capabilities without some resupply by us."
But Cordesman estimated it would take about two years of fighting before Israel needed help.
It was a much closer thing in 1973, when Egypt and Syria attacked Israel on Yom Kippur, one of the Jewish high holy days. As Egyptian tanks swept across the Sinai Peninsula and plunged through Israeli defenses, a panicked Israeli government pleaded with the United States for help.
Then-President Nixon quickly stationed two aircraft carriers off the Israeli coast and put U.S. combat forces on alert. Eight days later, U.S. cargo planes began delivering what would be more than 22,000 tons of supplies to Israel, including tanks and jet fighters.
The deliveries tipped the military balance. Israel counter-attacked with its tank forces, under the leadership of then-Gen. Sharon, chasing Egyptian troops back across the Suez Canal and reclaiming the Sinai.
From that experience came the U.S. pledge that Israel would never lose its "qualitative edge" in military power to any Arab neighbors, and U.S. military aid to Israel that backed up that pledge. U.S. military support to Egypt, which began after Egypt and Israel signed their 1979 peace treaty, is about two-thirds what Israel gets.
Despite the images of violence broadcast from the Palestinian territories, very little of the Israeli military is being used in current operations, analysts said. Israeli officials declined to say how many tanks have been deployed in the current fighting, but analysts estimated that not more than a few dozen of Israel's 4,000 main battle tanks were on the streets.
In an all-out war where civilian casualties were not a concern, Israel "could roll up the West Bank in 36 hours," Bryen said.
As for igniting a wider Middle East war, most analysts said the Israelis are confident they can handle any contingency — at least in the short run. Syria's military forces have atrophied badly since the collapse of the Soviet Union, its main benefactor. Egypt is said not to have the stomach for another wider war.
"We have to be realistic," Brower said. "We are the world's superpower in some respects, but we don't have a big capability in the Middle East and the Israelis know that. They can count."
Copyright © 2002 The Seattle Times Company
This is smaller than the USMC, our smallest force (with reserves roughly 200,000.)
Someone is full if it.
The sortie figures look to be similarly skewed; the Israeli Air Force is a top-notich organization, but the numbers presented for them represent a wartime pulse tempo using 100& of their forces, and the figures for the US represent current tempos, where we have significant forces invovled in combat but nowhere near what we could bring to bear (or that we have brought to bear when operation tempos were higher).
My guess is the 'between the lines' point here is that we (the US) should embargo any more weapons sales to Israel, since they are obviously bad guys anyway and can take care of themselves far beter than we can. I just finished reading another post about severe logisitical problems with the IDF Merkava fleet becuase some German company is witholding shipment of some engine components. Can't have it both ways; Israel is strong, but is not even close to self-sufficient for any long or even medium term military struggle.
They are stupid because they listen to lying morons like the fatman.
Some think Israel did better for itself before the US became such a close friend.
Yea, behind the exaggerations here, there is some "between the lines" motive. Build 'em up to knock 'em down?
How does it feel to be like the old CPUSA, which used to go on and on about how we "oughta" be allied with the likes of Uncle Joe? Most Americans knew better, of course, just as they know better than to trust Arab lies today.
LOL...hardly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.