[JoeSchem]

There's a limerick about a man who dyed his whiskers green, then hid them behind a screen 'so that they could not be seen.' Twenty-some years after their spat first began, Gould and Dawkins both still need to explain what is the 'screen' hiding the fossil evidence for evolution. Maybe the reason we see no proof of evolution is because evolution didn't occur?

"Whatever happened to Occam's Razor?" is what the creationists are asking. And twenty-some years later, the best Gould and Dawkins can do is shout in unison: "Shut up!"

[gore3000]

Maybe the reason we see no proof of evolution is because evolution didn't occur?

One would think that after 150 years of digging for bones, they would have some proof for their stupid theory.