Skip to comments.
Bush VOWS to review Clinton's Actions
USA Today ^
| 5 Jan. '01
| Unk.
Posted on 04/14/2002 8:19:27 AM PDT by rdavis84
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:39:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
AUSTIN, Texas (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: vows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Howlin
Hey, Good list!
21
posted on
04/14/2002 11:08:35 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
Oh, I knew you'd think so. It was written by a liberal.
22
posted on
04/14/2002 11:10:50 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I believe the topic was Executive Orders, but never mind. I'll take a look at this list. The results of some of these actions may surprise you, especially the replacement for Mr. Dombeck. It ain't what you think.
To: Carry_Okie
It ain't what you think either. This "list" was compiled by Bush haters and liberals.
24
posted on
04/14/2002 11:12:46 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Carry_Okie
"I believe the topic was Executive Orders, but never mind."
That's just standard M.O. for Howlin and Sinkspur. Quantity of Extraneous info on threads that are embarrassing to their boy .
25
posted on
04/14/2002 11:17:07 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
There's still time to drop the one on Presidential Papers and the FOIA.
26
posted on
04/14/2002 11:54:54 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: rdavis84;Howlin
Most people don't understand that banning logging on federal lands is in the interests of the largest corporations in the timber industry. The unspoken and tuly largest problem with the National Forests is that they produce TOO MUCH wood for anybody to use at a price that pays for the removal. Logging the National Forests would depress prices that Georgia Pacific, Weyerhauser, International Paper, Simpson, and the other giants get for their wood. That's why AlGore and Dombeck let it burn. It was a payoff to the timber industry.
Banning logging on Federal Lands also puts smaller mills out of business. That reduces competition. If anybody here thinks that Mark Rey is going to change that policy in the short term, they are mistaken. So what does he do instead? He lets the RICOnuts tar him with the "timber industry" brush in order to play to people like Howlin and his freinds laugh all the way to the bank. The nation's bug-infested forests continue to rot and burn soon to be overwhelmed by weeds.
The environment is too important, too profitable, and too complex to let it be controlled by government. There is an alternative.
To: steve50
"There's still time to drop the one on Presidential Papers and the FOIA." Don't you realise that 9-11 Happened...... uh.......well........ nevermind.
:-)
28
posted on
04/14/2002 12:09:31 PM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: Howlin; Carry_Okie; steve50
Howlin, It's interesting that you would post that list from this site ---
Red Pepper March 2002.
Is it part of your job to read what jr. is up to according to UK sites so you can attempt to prepare defenses?
29
posted on
04/14/2002 6:12:26 PM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: sinclair
Bump
30
posted on
04/15/2002 4:01:52 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: WhyToKay
"In practice, they are sometimes little different from the Dems"
Sometimes? When Clinton was in and he pulled some of his stuff the yelling about it was horrendous. With Bush in he gets a pass on nearly every unConstitutional move he pulls.
Who crammed the US Patriot Act thru?
31
posted on
04/15/2002 7:49:46 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
You really are dense, aren't you?
32
posted on
04/15/2002 8:34:36 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: rdavis84
so what, he said he would veto cfr, too. also said countries that harbor terrorists would be regarded as such. that and a quarter will buy you a cup of coffee.
33
posted on
04/15/2002 8:36:23 AM PDT
by
galt-jw
To: Howlin
"You really are dense, aren't you?"
Use smaller words then.
34
posted on
04/15/2002 9:18:45 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: rdavis84
Use smaller words then.Okay.....I'm sure you'll understand this because I'm sure a LOT of people have said it to you before:
DUH!!!!!
35
posted on
04/15/2002 2:47:02 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
"DUH!!!!!"
Much better. (are you SURE you spelled it right?)
36
posted on
04/15/2002 6:58:35 PM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: galt-jw
"so what, he said he would veto cfr, too. also said countries that harbor terrorists would be regarded as such. that and a quarter will buy you a cup of coffee."
Vows don't mean much these days, do they?
37
posted on
05/02/2002 6:21:13 AM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: steve50
"There's still time to drop the one on Presidential Papers and the FOIA."
Probably gonna do that while Slick is ambassadoring over in E.Timor, think?
38
posted on
05/09/2002 6:49:00 PM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: navyblue; sneakypete
Oldie time!
39
posted on
05/25/2002 7:31:11 PM PDT
by
rdavis84
To: Howlin
BTTT for future reference.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson