They do it for their love of terrorists, especially their very-kissable Arafat.
2002 Chief Terrorist Arafat and Imperial Wizard Annan
Buy neither stocks nor bonds nor a house. Invest in sanity instead. As this vote demonstrates, sanity is clearly in short supply.
UN_List: for United Nations articles. Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register Don't forget:
|
They're getting bolder.
Once again, the international "human rightser" community, just as it did in the case of the Balkans, has shown itself to be totally corrupt, and to have fallen way, way, WAY down from its once-noble purpose. These international meddlers almost invariably back the muslim cause, especially in cases in which the most bloodthirsty of muslim savages and their ghastly deeds are involved!!!!
Why would a "human rightser" back islam? Surely a TRUE supporter of human rights would realize that islamic nations and movements are responsible for a large percentage of all human rights violations in the world. This is especially true for terrorist quasi-states like the Shiptar muslim entity in Kosovo and the "Palestinian Authority". In the territories controlled by these entities, not only are Christian and Jewish minorities and neighbors mistreated, but even their own muslim people suffer countless atrocities every day from their islamic terrorist rulers!!!
Then any reason why "human rightsers" back islam nearly every single time must have nothing to do with human rights!!!! Some possible REAL reasons: 1. pandering to the ever-growing muslim minorities in their own countries (especially in Europe), and 2. oil!!!
Insanity.
it's no oversight! the UN is now packed with islamic countries and islamic appeasers. the appeasers will be stabbed in the back by their so-called friends (i.e., France and Belgium.)
the UN has become yet another front that the free and democractic nations will have to overcome.
It comes by the refusal to call things by their right names. The "suicide bombers" do more than kill themselves; the point of the exercise is murder. And the means of the murder is precisely to practice on the trust of the target. You add that all up and it fits perfectly the definition of one word: assassin.And indeed the refusal to call the assassins by their rightful name is of a piece with the determination to call captured ssassins by the wrong one--"prisoners of war." The Geneva Convention is not defended or extended but subverted when a power which seeks to abide by Geneva is criticized arbitrarily. If there is no way of avoiding criticism, the logical thing to do is then to avoid unnecessary trouble taking prisoners in the first instance.
We see the refusal to judge evil precisely because evil is dangerous. We see the refusal to judge "good" (there is none good but God) precisely because it is safe and because self-righteousness is natual.
We see cynicism.