Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smaturin
This did happen ( the felon purge) but there was no partisan intent as Palast deludes himself into thinking. Felons should not be on the voter roles in states where they lose the right to vote. He's only telling part of the story. This part of the election story was mostly ignored at the time by even the liberals because there wasn't anything to it. With a system that relies on voter honesty, some mistakes will happen. Every measure to make sure we only have honest and fair elections where "one man, one vote" is the end result are fought by the Democrats. This is just off the top of my head. I'll search and find a fair and complete treatment of this story and get back to you.
13 posted on 04/17/2002 11:23:00 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Thanks, HGC. I'm not sure that there was "partisan intent" either, but it's the kind of sloppiness that makes me sick to my stomach: a State official too busy to get the facts right when the peoples' right to vote is at stake. Blech.
19 posted on 04/17/2002 11:35:38 PM PDT by smaturin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson