And if you and your family are alone (for all intents and puposes) in the wilderness, and 100 invaders approach your home intent on killing you and your sons, raping your wife and daughters, stealing your property, destroying your home, you expect me to fight back with "discriminate" weapons? I want something to KILL every one of them. It's not a question of a "fair" fight - it DEFENSE - whatever it takes.
Whatever rights they had were abrogated the instant they invaded. I could care less about the "rights" of criminals. Since they have violated my rights, I maintain that not allowing me to defend myself or family - as needs dictate - is the theft of my rights.
It is a general rule not to entertain hypotheticals in a debate of logic, but let me disregard that sound advice for a moment: Fully-automatic weapons in each of your hands -- mom, sons, you -- would do the trick. A squad of lightly-trained and lightly-armed irregulars, when dug in, can pose an insurmountable obstacle to an equally-equipped force many times the defenders size. Use terrain as a force-multiplier. Since I place full-auto armaments in the light-regulation category, in Laz's world, you would be able to get such weaponry by undergoing a 5 minute criminal and mental background check.