This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Skip to comments.
JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT
Judicial Watch ^
| April 18, 2002
Posted on 04/18/2002 10:49:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 2,001-2,014 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Whachya hidin' Lar?
Given Judicial Watch's hyperactive legal machinations against the Bush administration, I don't expect Aschcroft to lift a finger.
And, I'm glad he's not. I'd like to see some of those financials myself.
2
posted on
04/18/2002 10:53:27 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Sorry, I don't care about Judicial Watch anymore...
3
posted on
04/18/2002 10:53:51 AM PDT
by
Drango
To: FreedominJesusChrist
The JW campaign to try and shift tactics to raise donations from Democrats by bashing Bush Admin. has tremendously failed; now hey're having to come back and try and re-establish support amongst conservatives for this latest fundraising drive.
4
posted on
04/18/2002 10:54:31 AM PDT
by
Steven W.
To: sinkspur
Do you believe that politically motivated IRS audits are beneficial to our country?
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Steven W.
During their attempts and eventual success in releasing the Energy Documents from Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force, Judicial Watch had never put the Clinton crimes on the back burner.
To: Drango
Well, then don't comment.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Do you believe that politically motivated IRS audits are beneficial to our country? I believe that a financial audit of Judicial Watch has been in order for a very long time. That it comes from the IRS is juicy, indeed.
Larry's running a political organization. Any investigation of it will be met with cries of "politics."
9
posted on
04/18/2002 11:04:15 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
I am curious to know just how many other conservative non-profits are audited by the IRS. This sounds politically motivated to me, especially given the comments by some of the IRS officials above. My question to you is: Do you believe that the Clinton Administration audited various conserivative organizations and individuals for political reasons? If so, do you believe that this is a good trend for our country?
I do not believe that Judicial Watch is spouting some conspiracy theory here, even the National Review complained that they were audited unfairly because of political reasons during the Clinton era.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Clinton's gone. Has been for over a year.
It's an audit. People and businesses get audited for lots of reasons.
Larry's been out of the news for a week or so; this must an attempt to gin up some dudgeon among his sap followers (like you).
You haven't changed a bit, Rebeckie.
11
posted on
04/18/2002 11:11:51 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
I think that you are oversimplifying the issue at stake here. By the way, you still haven't answered my oh so inquisitive questions to you.
As for your other comment, of course I haven't changed a bit. I am in college now and long past that adolescent stage in life and if you insist on calling me a name, just call me Beckie.
To: sinkspur
If they do end up getting audited, I can only hope that they have had perfectionist accountants and tax gurus working for them.
To: sinkspur
Clinton's gone. Has been for over a year. It's an audit. People and businesses get audited for lots of reasons.
Tell it to Judicial Watch, Joe Farah's Western Journalism Center, Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Katherine Prudhomme, Juanita Broaddrick, etc.
I cant understand how you, Bush, or Ashcroft would not support Judicial Watchs contention that these audits were politically motivated.
14
posted on
04/18/2002 11:20:13 AM PDT
by
dead
To: FreedominJesusChrist
These replies again show me that there really isn't much different in a dem or a pubbie follower. No matter who or what YOUR guy is you will support or villify if they don't tout YOUR (R) or (D) agenda. Such hippocrites.
15
posted on
04/18/2002 11:20:40 AM PDT
by
Digger
To: dead
Thank-you for calling a spade a spade. Anyone who does not believe that these audits were politically motivated, is being purely delusional or outright hostile to these conservative maverick organizations.
To: Digger
Is Jessie Jackson or NOW etc being audited? BTW why would anyone want to support this abtrusive organization stick'in it face in anyones business.
17
posted on
04/18/2002 11:24:41 AM PDT
by
Digger
To: Digger
Judicial Watch is having a tough time right now--because they are consistent and go after both parties, the powerful hypocrites on both sides will not help or stand up for them. In politics, it seems that the powerful elite protect the powerful elite and my opinion of both Bush and Ashcroft has gone considerably down because they will not do anything about the traitors in our country.
People always yell and scream when Judicial Watch cannot rack up numerous court wins, but they fail to hold the Justice Department to the same impossible standard that they hold to Judicial Watch.
To: Digger
You now something has gone horribly wrong with the Republican Party when they would rather side with the IRS, than a conservative maverick organization such as Judicial Watch.
To: zog, Fred Mertz, Ken H, Thanatos, poet, Let Loose the Dogs of War, Nunya bidness, Chu Gary
Ping!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 2,001-2,014 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson