JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT

Judicial Watch ^ | April 18, 2002

[BeAChooser]

For the second time, paste right here on this thread where I defended either one of them.

I don't have to, Howlin, you already did. You are the one who introduced them into this thread. I've asked you many times to indicate the sources of information you consider reliable and you have NEVER responded. I don't think it is coincidence that the first time you actually do provide sources to back up something you claim, they are a left-leaning magazine and a left-leaning website. You can play your "definition of IS" and "EXACTLY" games all you want. I'm not going to play them with you anymore. The INTENT of what you post is ALL that matters.

[BeAChooser]

Southflanknorthpawsis/Howlin. Don't you get tired of talking to yourself. And perhaps Howlin should chastise you for saying something nasty about another poster without pinging them. She does say those are the "rules" on this forum. Me, I just think it is a matter of common courtesy.

[Howlin]

Just as I thought. You can't do it.

[Howlin]

Watch out; you'll get on her list!

[Howlin]

Yes, you did read that very thing. I posted the quote up the thread.

[ArneFufkin]

The interesting tidbit when you dig through the numbers is that 22% of the people on his mailing list have taken out restraining orders against him.

[palo verde]

Hi Fred,
I too moved heaven and earth to get Bush into office
I think his character is golden
I do not think his choice not to prosecute and investigate the clinton corruption is in best interest of our Republic
However, wisdom of decisions is seen by their results
I already see some results from allowing billclinton to continue to operate with a free hand
I think there will be more results
Posters may never agree on who authors these problems
since most posters on FR believed Al Gore architected the post-election coup
while I recognized the hand of slick willy behind it
It is blessing we united to get slickwilly out of power
but it turns out we have different perceptions
I wanted slick out cause he is a criminal
other posters may have wanted him out cause they believe he is a leftist
I find FreedominJC's posts logical, clear, truthful
Love, Palo

[Howlin]

And perhaps Howlin should chastise you for saying something nasty about another poster without pinging them.

You responded to South's #1112; I looked back at that post; where did she NAME a poster?

BTW, do you consider it courteous to call people LIARS? Is that your idea of being kind?

[Howlin]

ROFL.....you know what, I got some email today from some people who know about what happened at C-PAC, but are afraid to post on this very thread because they are afraid Klayman might try to SUE them!

[ArneFufkin]

Howlin, was it BJC (Rebeckie) who made the comment that George W. Bush was nothing like she remembered Reagan?

[deport]

I know but didn't want to go look it up......

Now back to the thread topic of which Ron Brown isn't ...... Have you seen a published time table for the audit process? I know it's been almost 3 1/2 yrs since the first notice and still no audits completed yet apparently. Heck if the 'ethical Washington Watchdog' had done the ethical thing and got on with the audit back then it would be over and he'd be onto other things. That audit had to have been for some of the previous years (94,95,96)when there weren't a lot of dollars involved. Now it's gotten much bigger and more people and dollars involved, more paper work, more books to reconcile, receipts to find, etc, etc.

Oh well on with the program. The sun will rise tomorrow as surely as it will set later today.

[Howlin]

Yes, I do. I can barely remember Reagan.......LOL.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

What argument? It is an indisputable fact that NO ONE can prove why this supposed audit is taking place. Speculation abounds; facts remain unstated.

Until then there is only one truth. We do not know with certainty why Klayman/JW is targeted.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

You responded to South's #1112; I looked back at that post; where did she NAME a poster?

ROFL !!! I noticed this too. There's nothing funnier than someone who recognizes himself/herself by a description and then points out the fact. It's a sort of self-incrimination, isn't it?

[ArneFufkin]

One of Klayman's kids sitting out on my front doorstep right now. He's on a hunger strike until I tithe my commitment to the sacred task of hiring 50 new attorneys at JW by June 1. I asked the kid why 50, he said ... "Dad was fired from a firm that had 298, this will give us 300." "So, you're hiring attorneys to bolster the attorney inventory?" "Yeah ... and to rain countless billable hours and innumerable marketing pieces on the heathens." "Would you like a bagel" "Sure". "Are you billing me right now?" "Well, if anyone asks, maybe!!" "I have a Mapquest trip planner and a WorldPerks plane ticket to HOWLIN'S house." That's HOWLIN'. South Carolina or Georgia or Kentucky or somewhere .... you'll find her, good luck kid." Larry's kid looks just like Screech from "Saved by the Bell"

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Yes, I did make a comment similiar to that a little while ago. I do not see anything wrong with me doing so. I remember a lot about Reagan from my parents, who happen to believe that Reagan is one of our greatest presidents. I also have the ability to remember a little of what Reagan was like, I was still around 7 years old when he left office. Kids can remember back until they were 3 years old in much detail, I know that I can.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, it doesn't take a genuis to figure out who you guys were talking about. You personally attack BeAChooser all the time.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

You know, don't bring Larry's kids in here. That just isn't very nice, even if it is a joke. Just debate about Larry and Judicial Watch if you have a problem with them.

[ArneFufkin]

Just checking ... it seemed silly at the time.

[ArneFufkin]

So ... who's Beth Klayman?