| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Posted on 04/18/2002 10:49:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
Hey, look at your post, you are asking your debating partners to enter the nebulous world of your imagination and join you in wrestling with insubstantial spectres that inhabit only your mind.
I experienced this often debating with liberals at the Post, but this silly kubuki dance nightmare rarely unfolds here.
Sorry, you will have to gnaw the bones of your troubling ruminations alone.
Outside your mind in the light of day a self admitted felon stands acused of acting like a crook.
His accuser is protected by the same expectation of good faith that fair minds extend to every non crook.
They are protesting the intention behind the audit, not the audit itself.
Title of thread:
JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT
Confused again or just another misunderstanding, Rebeckie?
Don't you wish. The problem is that now, thanks to Ron Brown, the cat is out of the bag. Howlin, thanks to her own statements on this thread, is going to have an even harder time convincing readers she is conservative and honest the next time she posts. And lurkers are going to be wondering about those of you who continue to appear supportive of her after all she's revealed here too.
And by the way, I wonder what you think of the fact that the Washington Post and Slate are the only two sources Howlin seems to be able to cite about anything? I wonder what you think about her statement that the Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate and Riady non-refund matters have been "investigated" and found to be "nothing"?
I'm always on the side of Mr. and Mrs. America, Freedom. This audit business stinks. If the IRS gets away with doing this to Larry, what's to protect you? Or me? Or our children? Or their children?
Judicial Watch must stand firm. We are dealing with important principles here!
Judicial Watch will not fold. And we will not fold! Nothing, not even a prison term for our champions, can be permitted to break our spirit!
There must be no settlement in this matter.
I agree, they have nothing to fear because there is no evidence, no pattern, no practice of criminality.
clinton has little to fear because, in spite of overwhelming evidence of criminality, he is protected by ideologically blind syncophants.
I wonder who sleeps better.
And, that, of course, would be quite unlike you, who makes yours up as you go along.
BTW, when will you be posting my quote calling Linda Tripp a liar?
Yeah, I know.
No, they are not. In the beginning, they QUESTIONED the intent of the audit; they have now been told personally by Michael Chertoff that he has reviewed the files and says that there is no politics involved. Everything they have said since then is based on an untruth, as it has already been decided there is no political intent behind the audit.
Is he a liar, too?
Actually, no. I am not the one who claimed not to be condescending.
I'm kind of new to all this and I probably don't always come across as clearly as I should.
Thanks for the warning. I'll try to turn it up a notch or two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.