| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Posted on 04/18/2002 10:49:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
He did threaten to sue, you know. And he DID get his registration in late and there were no booths avaiable. That is the SUM total of the "truth."
I'm sure Klayman likes having the "issue" though; it makes him appear the victim, which, of course, fits his new profile as a liberal.
No, I believe you.
I know what work she has done for the Republican party. I have met her and we worked very hard in 2000 to get George Bush elected. She was in the forefront of identifying voter fraud in her state.
Well ANYONE could claim that on the internet. Who is to know? And if SHE is a Republican, then you should be even more concerned at her LIE about having witnessed Howlin put me "under the table" where Brown is concerned. Do you always come to the defense of liars? Is that what the Republican party is coming to ... acting just like the democRATS we all despised the last 9 years? Is that why you excuse Bush for not even investigating the many crimes that the Clintons and their followers appear to have committed? If so, then how long will it be before you excuse Bush and his followers for committing and covering up crimes too? Maybe THAT is what is going on in this thread.
I volunteered for the famous democrat, David McIntosh, in his gubernatorial campaign. Some democrat I am!
So you claim, but that doesn't seem to be consistent with staunchly defending A Citizen Reporter, who clearly lied on this thread, and Howlin, who clearly knows nothing about Brown even though she continues to dishonestly suggest she does. So you claim but actions speak louder than words. Since when has it become party policy to ignore serious crimes by democRATS?
You are really going to have to get over the idea that because people don't agree with your take, they must be democrats. That is silly.
Fine. Then you are NEW Republicans that are no different than democRATS in putting party over principle, party over what is right, and party over the law.
On the other hand, you do tie up a lot of time expecting everyone to answer every single post you put up, even though they are repetitive.
"expect" is the key word. The FACT is that you move-on'ers never do address the questions that are asked (although in this thread we did make some progress where Howlin is concerned). You continue to avoid the few really important questions I keep asking. Questions like ... what is the basis on which you "trust" Bush if he clearly is ignoring crimes as serious as murder?
I don't know whether Brown was murdered or not;
And you don't even want to know. The facts might shatter your illusions.
Bill Clinton didn't do it, because he was here in this country.
Oh right. Let's release all those convicted of conspiracy to commit murder from jail. But you are right, I don't KNOW if Clinton was directly involved. The facts seem to suggest he MIGHT be given that we have sworn testimony that the orders not to do an autopsy came from the Whitehouse, that he was told by Brown only days before that Brown was going to turn state's evidence in a matters involving treasonous activities, that his top aides were told by Brown that if he went down he was going to take them all down with him, that Brown wasn't scheduled to be on that flight but the orders to do so came from the Whitehouse after Brown talked to Clinton. And even if Clinton wasn't directly involved, someone(s) in his administration were. Don't you care about finding the murderers or those who helped cover up a crime as serious at that? If not, I don't see how you can claim to be a Republican.
If Brown was murdered, it was either by a someone on the ground who happened upon the crash site and was looting,
Fine. Then why did the AFIP management and the rest of the Clinton administration work so hard to cover that up? You are SPINNING Miss Marple, digging yourself into a hole just like Howlin did.
or an agent at directions from Clinton, in which case the perpetrator is long gone.
But the people who covered the murder up are still around and we even know who they are. Put pressure on those people and some of them are likely to crack and tell us more about who gave the orders and how it was done. See ... its this little word called "investigation" that you move-on'ers seem to fear so much.
It serves NO purpose to keep dragging this matter back up.
You are just SPINNING Miss Marple. Making excuses up to cover a DISINTEREST in the possible MURDER of a Secretary of Commerce of the United States. Now why would a Republican be disinterested in such a horrific event?
There is no more evidence today than there was right after it happened.
Be careful, you are using the word "evidence" incorrectly according to Howlin. Or on second thought, perhaps you are adopting Howlin's definition. In either case, there has been NO HONEST INVESTIGATION of the events surrounding Brown's death so how could there be more "evidence". But his body is still there waiting to prove one way or another whether he was murdered. The people who are alleged to have covered this up at AFIP are still there waiting to be grilled by the FBI. There's no more "evidence" today because you move-on'ers don't want any investigation done. Circular logic I think.
Your interest is in convincing us that we should all distrust Bush and Ashcroft because they don't follow YOUR appraoved plan of attack. I guess you said it best: "It is easy to PRETEND to be conservative on the internet. "
Right Miss Marple. Just keep on spinning and excusing MASS MURDER. Just keep on ignoring all the other crimes that the Clintons and supporters are alleged (based on credible information) to have committed. Just keep on defending the GOP inaction where those crimes are concerned. It is "expected" of you ... by your handlers ... I "expect".
You just keep twisting in the breeze, don't you, Rebeckie? You fly off with statements that can't be backed up. Your credibility continues to slide downward as your frustration soars.
To my knowledge, I have never personally encountered BeAChooser until I joined this thread.
But then, you are given to exaggeration and unfounded claims, aren't you?
He's a public figure who goes around talking about other people's personal lives; he's a fair target.
Welcome to the real world.
Arne said he has gotten material from JW signed by a Beth Klayman. And now you're calling him a liar????
Does EVERYBODY lie except you and Larry?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.