Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdLake
Your link is just a rehash of the Isikoff Newsweek story, which William Safire has already refuted.

And in the meantime, some more non-evidence for you: Either on the 19th or the 20th of September,[note the date] an article that appeared allegedly written by Uday [Hussein] in the Babel newspaper referred to a ''virus that would''—the exact wording to the effect that ''A virus would attack the raven and it would respond to antibiotics at first, but in later times, would no longer be controlled by antibiotics.''

83 posted on 05/02/2002 9:07:30 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: denydenydeny
The William Safire report seems to be saying merely that he believes the early reports and doesn't believe the later reports. He doesn't really have any proof of anything.

As far as the second item is concerned, anthrax is a germ, not a virus. So that cryptic warning means nothing.

Ed

84 posted on 05/03/2002 7:43:07 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson