Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited
Newsmax ^ | April 23,2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/22/2002 10:00:48 PM PDT by Kay Soze

IRS Official to Judicial Watch: Clinton Enemies Were Audited Carl Limbacher, NewsMax.com

Tuesday, April 23, 2002

An official with the Internal Revenue Service has admitted that legal opponents of former President Bill Clinton were singled out for tax audits, according to court documents made public this week. "What do you expect when you sue the president?" senior IRS official Paul Breslan told Judicial Watch, the Washington-based legal watchdog group that had filed 50-plus legal actions against the Clinton administration and subsequently found itself in the IRS's cross hairs.

Breslan's quote is cited in Judicial Watch's complaint against the tax agency, based on a host of what look to be politically inspired audits that make the worst abuses of the Nixon administration appear puny by comparison.

"There were literally six witnesses in the room when Breslan told us we should have expected an audit," Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman revealed to NewsMax.com. "Four of them were lawyers."

The legal group became the target of an IRS audit in 1998, just four days after it filed an independent impeachment report against Clinton, based on years of investigation into everything from Chinagate to the Paula Jones case.

But Judicial Watch wasn't alone. Witnesses bearing damaging testimony against the president were a favorite target of the Clinton IRS. Those singled out for audits include:

Leak

The Jones case, which would eventually lead to Clinton's impeachment, was of particular interest to the IRS, which apparently leaked her confidential tax returns to the late New York Daily News reporter Lars Erik Nelson.

In a September 1997 column Nelson revealed details from Jones' filing to bolster claims that she was profiting from her sexual harassment lawsuit against Clinton.

In a subsequent interview with NewsMax.com's Carl Limbacher (then with the Washington Weekly), Nelson insisted somewhat implausibly that a "friend" of Jones had come across her tax return during a visit to her home and decided to go public with the secrets.

Quite an Enemies List

As the Judicial Watch complaint notes, the Clinton IRS also went after organizations and even media companies it perceived as politically hostile, including:

The National Rifle Association, The Heritage Foundation, The National Review, The American Spectator, Freedom Alliance, National Center for Public Policy Research, American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens Against Government Waste, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, Concerned Women for America and the San Diego Chapter of Christian Coalition.

Fox News Channel analyst Bill O'Reilly, a frequent critic of Bill and Hillary Clinton, has also pointed out how the IRS has repeatedly audited him.

The political nature of the Judicial Watch's audit seems particularly blatant.

"The IRS asked for our political affiliations in the first notice of audit," Klayman told NewsMax.

When he questioned why auditors wanted to know about the group's political ties, an IRS district director said the information had been deemed "relevant."

Worse still, each time Judicial Watch seemed to make legal headway against the White House, the IRS ratcheted up the pressure.

"When we would accomplish something big, like the criminal finding by Judge Royce Lamberth against Clinton in the Kathleen Willey Privacy Act case, our lawyers would get a call saying, 'We just want you to know that Judicial Watch is still on the IRS's radar screen,'" Klayman said.

"The same thing happened when we revealed the White House e-mail scandal," he added.

Shockingly, the IRS's intimidation tactics continue into the Bush administration, which has failed to sack Clinton's IRS Commissioner Charles Rosotti.

After Judicial Watch won the release of thousands of pages of documents from Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force last month, a badge-wearing IRS agent showed up at the group's offices.

A personal meeting between Klayman and Bush Justice Department Criminal Division chief Michael Chertoff, who led the Senate investigation into the Clintons' Whitewater abuses, failed to yield any interest in pursuing IRS abuses, which now threaten to tarnish the Bush administration.

When noted columnist Robert Novak inquired of the Justice Department about Judicial Watch's IRS complaint, he was told by a department official, "I don't know what we are going to do with this Klayman."

"When we were told that we were being audited because we sued Bill Clinton, we had no choice but to stand up and fight in court," Klayman said. "By leaving Charles Rossotti as IRS commissioner, Bush obviously is sending a signal that political audits are fine with him."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; clinton; clintonhaters; clintonscandals; democrats; irs; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-655 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist; BeAChooser
I believe that you and BeAChooser were arguing about Ron Brown, although I am not sure, you may wish to check the thread yourself.

Oh, that's right. BeAChooser was unwittingly aiding and abetting the cover-up of the Ron Brown suicide.

And what side of this important issue were you on, Freedom?

41 posted on 05/06/2002 8:50:00 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Either way, Novak supports Klayman on this one, which is very important.
42 posted on 05/06/2002 8:50:04 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; alcuin; anniegetyourgun; Aquinasfan; ArneFufkin; Askel5; BibChr...
This thread has the makings of a food fight.
43 posted on 05/06/2002 8:51:34 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Either way, Novak AND Newsmax got their FACTS from Larry Klayman. We shall see who is right.
44 posted on 05/06/2002 8:52:32 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Novak supports Klayman on this one, which is very important.

To whom? Why?

45 posted on 05/06/2002 8:53:00 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
This thread has the makings of a food fight.

I've been needing to clean the fridge for over a week now.

46 posted on 05/06/2002 8:53:14 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: deport
Seems there was some talk at one time about the "over my dead body" statement about releasing the donor list to the IRS...

Larry hasn't gone and done anything rash, has he?

47 posted on 05/06/2002 8:53:36 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I've been needing to clean the fridge for over a week now.

LOL I see some hungry people out there!

48 posted on 05/06/2002 8:54:31 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist

49 posted on 05/06/2002 8:56:16 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
This thread has the makings of a food fight.

I insist that we all try to be as rational and as fair as possible. There are important issues at stake here.

Please, please, no fighting.

50 posted on 05/06/2002 8:56:58 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"With all due respect, Rebeckie........Howlin simply believes in logic and objectivity."

Howlin is not an objective poster, her personal dislike for klayman inhibits her ability to see the good he has done. Anyway, I do not take their polemic rants very seriously anymore, especially since her and Arne call themselves "Larry's spurned lovers."

51 posted on 05/06/2002 8:57:58 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ned
The 'eww' do something rash.... naw..... or otherwise for that matter.

Please do not panic. First , I pledge that, pursuant to law, it will be “over my dead body” before I release your name to the IRS. .....

52 posted on 05/06/2002 9:00:09 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: deport
As I recall, there was some talk about the need to change the stated purpose of the JW entity, wasn't there? Something to do with where all the money was going . . .
53 posted on 05/06/2002 9:02:01 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ned
We do not know that for sure.
54 posted on 05/06/2002 9:02:49 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ned
"And what side of this important issue were you on, Freedom?"

Take a wild guess Ned. You already know the answer to that question, so I am not even going to waste my breath.

55 posted on 05/06/2002 9:04:08 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Howlin is not an objective poster, her personal dislike for klayman inhibits her ability to see the good he has done.

Freedom, one might also say that your personal admiration for Klayman inhibits your ability to see that there are serious financial questions surrounding his operation - including the allegation that JW failed to claim as income about $500,000 in grants from one of Scaiffe's foundations a few years back.

56 posted on 05/06/2002 9:04:09 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ned
Who knows where the money is going...... The 'eww' doesn't post a list of expenditures on his website.... but some have suggested he spends very little on his legal mission.... But hey, the cruises are nice, I suspect.
57 posted on 05/06/2002 9:04:52 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
We do not know that for sure

We do not know what for sure?

Until the audit's done, we're not going to know anything for sure. You know, as I recall, they're only asking for a list of the contributors through the year 2000. JW should just post them on his website and show the IRS up.

58 posted on 05/06/2002 9:05:22 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Thanks for the ping....I think.

All I know is that many conservative think tanks and organizations were audited for nearly the entire 2 terms of the Clinton administration - with NO findings. It was pure harassment. Just ask the Christian Coalition, The Heritage Foundation, and so on and so on.....

59 posted on 05/06/2002 9:06:14 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"Freedom, one might also say that your personal admiration for Klayman inhibits your ability to see that there are serious financial questions surrounding his operation - including the allegation that JW failed to claim as income about $500,000 in grants from one of Scaiffe's foundations a few years back."

While it is true that I do admire the two K's--Keyes and Klayman, having a firm respect for them does not impede my ability to judge, even if I am personally not being objective myself. I do not believe that other allegation anyway.

60 posted on 05/06/2002 9:06:33 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson