Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
Zero population growth is a good idea? No, it is not.

The entire worlds population could live in Texas. Broken up into families of 4, each family would get nearly and acre of land.

Stick to shrinking government and not populations.

3 posted on 04/24/2002 5:26:02 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Phantom Lord
Stick to shrinking government and not populations.

Absolutely! Once you begin with restricting people growth, you enter into all kinds of sticky issues. Who can reproduce? Who do we eliminate? What about personal freedom to make decisions? Not only is this a slippery slope, it leads to the end of all freedom!

5 posted on 04/24/2002 5:30:38 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
The entire worlds population could live in Texas. Broken up into families of 4, each family would get nearly and acre of land.

216914 square miles, 640 acres per square mile, 168 million acres or 670 million people in families of 4 per acre. World population: 6.2 billion (40 people per acre).

Not too bad until they all get into their cars.

15 posted on 04/24/2002 6:52:07 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
And what about the next generation, when all those people living on one acre in Texas have 2.5 - 3 children apiece? And the generation after that? What ever quality of life is theoretically available to the current number of people on earth, deteriorates with each successive generation that is larger than the one before. Remember the wonderful pioneer era in this country, when hard-working people needed only to stake their claim to 20 or 40 acres of free land, and then settle down to improving their' families' standard of living? That's no longer an option. With continued population growth, the acre in Texas won't be an option either (and by the way, that calculation assumes that all roads, farms, ranches, parks, wildlife habitats, etc. are eliminated).
17 posted on 04/24/2002 7:06:45 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
In the U.S., at least, we are pretty close to zero population growth, excluding immigration.
32 posted on 04/24/2002 8:00:00 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord
Hmm...and I suppose that an acre of land can produce enough food for four people? People need vastly more space to survive than just what they live in. That being said, smaller government is a good idea, too.
60 posted on 04/24/2002 3:23:41 PM PDT by delphine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Phantom Lord; delphine
The entire worlds population could live in Texas. Broken up into families of 4, each family would get nearly and acre of land.

Why waste a whole acre on four people?

Prisons need only 100 square feet for a "family" of two.

How strange to equate crowding with punishment and loss of freedom!

65 posted on 04/24/2002 6:41:33 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson