Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If we must go to war, let's not go Dutch
The Guardian ^ | April 24 2002 | Ian Buruma

Posted on 04/24/2002 3:48:33 PM PDT by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Spar
God please continue to bless and strengthen heroic Slobodan Milsevic, and Serbian people everywhere, that Kosovo not be permanently lost.

Albanians must be made to pay for all that they have done, including obtaining help from evil Americans Madeline Albright, Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Serbia lives, Serbia is not dead yet.

21 posted on 04/24/2002 5:46:49 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
A rare crystal clarity and emerges from the muck of the Guardian, how odd.

I loved the bit about everyone calling the Americans "cowboys" when we answer their call for help.

22 posted on 04/24/2002 5:54:39 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Heineken?

Hashish?
23 posted on 04/24/2002 6:08:10 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I am adamantly opposed to our military ever taking orders from the UN. But then, I am adamantly against the UN.

Unlike the debacle in Viet Nam, the U.S.'s military leaders today have an over-all plan before sending our troops anywhere. Those plans include the needed support to complete their objective with a minimum of loss of life to our troops. Those plans also include an exit strategy that attempts to avoid protracted presence once the objective has been accomplished.

The UN doesn't have a clue, or a plan, and could care less about the welfare of their "peace-keepers" (unless they are Arab). The Dutch got a raw deal, as the UN didn't send them in with sufficient force or back-up to attain the goal they had been given.

It is the UN that should withdraw from the field, or at least offer an apology!!

24 posted on 04/24/2002 8:58:00 PM PDT by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Social security after one gets unemployed. 'Bijstand' is when one never had a job and gets social security.
25 posted on 04/25/2002 3:34:34 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
The thing is that the cabinet should have regined earlier. They tried to avoid the matter by stalling the reports as long as possible.
26 posted on 04/25/2002 3:35:42 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Thanks. And indeed the article is almost completly un-Guardian like.
27 posted on 04/25/2002 3:36:48 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson