[anniegetyourgun]

Once again, child porn (real or created) is not speech anymore than you deciding to poop on the sidewalks and call it art.

[ctdonath2]

The latter is an action which may be prohibited; the former is not when done "virtually", i.e.: the image is created by drawing, painting, or pushing pixels. Your analogy isn't. How can you legally ban images without suppressing practically identical legitimate images? and how can you prevent such bans being used for precident to ban "virtual" depictions of other illegal/immoral activities?