Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
You obviously haven't read the ruling. Come back when you understand the issue at hand.
92 posted on 04/24/2002 9:59:23 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


BTW: Here is the ruling.
93 posted on 04/24/2002 10:00:44 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: Redcloak
I've read the ruling. Now I would suggest you read the Constitution, the Federalist Papers and some Early American History. Then look up the meaning of the word constructionist.

When you're done again, re read the ruling and then read the dissents. Then take a peak at the 24 states who have enacted legislation banning virtual kiddie porn. This ruling makes those laws unconstitutional in point of fact.

When you're done with all of that try to convince yourself that freedom and liberty come from an omnipotent central government ruling that a pedophiles right to virtual child pornography is protected somewhere in the first amendment. An amendment crafted by the same men who crafted and lived with obsecnity laws in their states.

95 posted on 04/24/2002 10:09:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson