Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
I will take your continued refusal to explain how you read the Declaration teaching on unalienable rights to mean that you wish this conversation to end.

I will end my part by reminding you that without a coherent account of the source of our rights, we can't very well defend them.

246 posted on 04/29/2002 9:40:20 PM PDT by davidjquackenbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: davidjquackenbush
I will take your continued refusal to explain how you read the Declaration teaching on unalienable rights to mean that you wish this conversation to end.

How strange that you think I must somehow explain & 'read a teaching', that only you can see.

Unalienable rights are self evident, imo. The declarations language is clear. - My life is mine to live. I need no imput from you or Ashcroft.

I will end my part by reminding you that without a coherent account of the source of our rights, we can't very well defend them.

I'll await your self touted 'coherence' with bated breath.

247 posted on 04/29/2002 11:18:06 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson