[justshutupandtakeit]

The only part of your most recent bilge I am going to respond to is to state unequivocably that you lie when you claim that I said the War was an attempt to free the slaves on the part of the north. The War on the part of the South was to maintain slavery but Lincoln's war was strictly to save the Union and uphold the Constitution. Given your willingness to lie about what I say I presume much of the rest of what you say are lies as well. Certainly the statement that slavery existed after the war in the north is a silly whopper unworthy of a elementary school student i.e. about par for the course for a D.S. What Lincoln's 1st inaugeral address has to do with "slavery after the war in the north" would be known only to you. It is just another ridiculous juxtaposition without meaning like comparing a skirmish to one of the major battles in world history.

Nothing you do will change my mind? Quite the contrary any cogent, and true facts are readily accepted as was your correction wrt Sam Houston. However, you can save the electrons if you want to try and get the standard D.S. litany of lies past me. They would be shredded as easily as the preposterous proposition that an incompetently lead Union "Armada" floundering on a little bad luck was another Thermopylae. Although I do appreciate exposure to the most absurd claim I have yet to find on FR. It has provided a week of laughs watching you try and justify such overblown hyperbole and outright falsehoods. You may as well try for the trifecta and work Marathon in as well then an Armada, losing Marathon and Thermopylae would be just perfect.

Why would a D.S. called himself a "capitalist" in any sense since the Slaveocracy hated capitalism (and anything else modern) with a blue passion? Slaveocracy is opposed to capitalism at every point of its theory and practice especially wrt freedom of the individual and attitude toward work. Such opposition was one of many reasons that the Slaveocrats' pretensions of independence and sovereignty was so laughably absurd and meatheaded.

[GOPcapitalist]

As I noted earlier, I have gone out of my way to accomodate a civilized debate over specific issues with you. It has become increasingly evident in the hostility contained within your statements that you no more seek an intelligent discussion on the issues than an average run of the mill Democrat political spin doctor.

In light of your unnecessarily vitriolic posting patterns, I see no reason why I should continue a discussion with you.