Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
The bit about the party affiliation of the governor having a big impact on the subsequent presidential votes has been disproven time and again. It hardly matters at all, and whether Simon wins or loses will have little impact on Bush's performance in California in 2004.
27 posted on 04/28/2002 2:37:06 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
As a Californian who loves this state despite its horrible politics, I can say with certainty that a Simon victory would be very important to me. Unfortunately, Republicans in this state are like a microcosm of the differences between New England Republicans and Southern Republicans. From assembly races all the way to races for governor, no Republican candidate here is ever pure enough for some faction or other. It costs Republicans elections time and time and time again, because some disgruntled group or other is always defecting in a huff. This rarely happens on the Democrat side -- only once in awhile when the Greens make an impact in a particular locality.

Republicans are very talented at forgetting what they have in common while simultaneously overblowing their differences. They are very poor at bridging their differences to form winning coalitions. In a state like California, where Dem registrations significantly outstrip Rep, Republicans need large turnouts of their own voters, plus they need to peel enough votes from the mushy middle in order to win. Anyone who doesn't understand the reality and implication of this situation is dumber than a box of rocks as regards politics.

Like Nero fiddling while Rome burned around him, one can stand rigidly on principle while resigning oneself to perpetual subjugation. Or one can learn that politics is the art of consensus-building. It took six long, difficult years from the Boston Massacre in 1770 for the 13 colonies to reach the consensus necessary to unanimously declare independence from Britian in 1776.

The road to independence was paved with debate after debate; the work of two Continental Congresses; the burnings of several American costal towns by the British; the bravery of the volunteers at Lexington, Concord and the siege of Boston. It was paved with attempts at persuasion by both radicals for independence and the conservatives of that day -- those who wanted to reconcile with Britain. It was paved by sacrifice, hard work, sweat and many, many tears. Even as late as the spring of 1776, a move toward independence was by no means a certainty.

The true "greatest generation" bequeathed to us a nation founded through the art of political persuasion -- its very nationhood secured by that most politically persuasive of all documents, the Declaration of Independence. It's main purpose was to invite the established powers of the day to recognize our new nation. Are we then, today, so blind to their political legacy as to hold ourselves as arrogantly above our obligation to persuade and consensus-build as was the British Crown of their day?

36 posted on 04/28/2002 9:07:32 PM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson