Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
I am not so far removed from con law that I have entirely forgotten the history of the exclusionary rule - you omitted Wolf v Colorado from your discussion ;)

As it is late, I won't answer you tonight, except to point out that Wolf did not apply the exclusionary rule to the states. It said that the 4th Amendment applied to the states through the 14th, but did not apply the exclusionary rule. That's why I left it out. We'll call it "Judicial Economy".

Until tomorrow.

126 posted on 05/01/2002 7:01:41 PM PDT by Rule of Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Rule of Law
As it is late, I won't answer you tonight, except to point out that Wolf did not apply the exclusionary rule to the states. It said that the 4th Amendment applied to the states through the 14th, but did not apply the exclusionary rule. That's why I left it out.

You are correct, although I would have included it in a discussion of the Fourth Amendment. A stylistic difference, perhaps ;)

135 posted on 05/02/2002 4:46:04 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson