INTRODUCTION
In America today, we see an unprecedented effort by an organized and politicized group: militant homosexual activists, to infiltrate important strongholds of the culture and, in so doing, change the culture from one which protects children from homosexuality to one which indoctrinates and exploits children and propagandizes them into accepting homosexuality as just another lifestyle choice or, in their words: "orientation."
In our schools, in our media, and now, sadly, throughout our Church, the incessant march of the militant homosexual movement moves on leaving in its wake a confused, coopted, and morally exploited youth and culture.
1. WE'RE HERE WE'RE QUEER AND WE ARE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN (the chant heard at the 1993 Gay Activists March on Washington attended by thousands of militant activist gays)
A. THEIR AGENDA (Printed in the 1987 United States Congressional Record)
"We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truckstops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep." 1. (Swift; Homosexual Revolution).
B. THEIR METHODS
( After the Ball: How America Will conquer its Fear and hatred of Gays in the 1990s (published by Plume Press, Penguin Group, 1989).
The book "After the Ball" is a how-to handbook and guide on changing the thinking of the heterosexual majority by advertising and thought control. It contains an action plan to alter the perceptions of the American public (especially of the young), in order to make it tolerant, accepting and embracing of homosexuality.2. After the Ball, Penguin, 1989.
The book details "a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image" (by using these tactics):
"Desensitization": flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the "least offensive" manner possible.
" "Jamming": Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.
"Conversion": Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. "The image must be the icon of normality." 3. Makow, Toogood Reports: http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/society/gay_behavior_sick.htm
"'Jamming makes use of the rule of associative conditioning (according to the authors)--the psychological process whereby when two things are repeatedly juxtaposed--one's feelings about one are transferred to the other. An incompatible emotional response is directed to make people feel shame when they perceive that they are not feeling, thinking, or acting like one of the pack [the homosexual pack]. The trick is to get the average heterosexual into the position of feeling a twinge of shame so that, via repeated exposure to pictorial images or verbal statements, any thinking or expression as regards the abnormality of homosexuality--will come to be incompatible with his inner image as a well-liked person--one who fits in with the rest of the crowd
Marshall Kirk is a researcher in neuropsychiatry of enormous intelligence who works almost exclusively with aptitude tests for adults with IQs of over200. Hunter Madsen received his doctorate in politics from Harvard, and is an expert in public persuasion tactics and social marketing. He designs commercial advertising for Madison Avenue and has served as consultant to gay media campaigns across the country. Together they became a formidable pair as advocates for "gay rights" and upsetting the heterosexual applecart'." 4. NARTH
C. The Demands: (From the Platform of the April 25, 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi equal rights and liberation):
1. We demand passage of a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender civil rights bill and an end to discrimination by state and federal governments including military; repeal of all sodomy laws and other laws that criminialize private sexual expression between consenting adults.
2. We demand massive increase in funding for AIDS education, research, and patient care; universal access to health care including alternative therapies; and an end to sexism in medical research and health care.
3. We demand legislation to prevent discrimination against Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transgendered people in the areas of family diversity, custody, adoption and foster care and that the definition of family includes the full diversity of family structures.
4. We demand full and equal inclusion of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transgendered people in the educational system, and inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered studies in multicultural curricula.
5. We demand the right to reproductive freedom and choice, to control our own bodies, and an end to sexist discrimination.
6. We demand an end to racial and ethnic discrimination in all forms.
7. We demand an end to discrimination and violent oppression based on actual or perceived sexual orientation/identification, race, religion, identity, sex and gender expression, disability, age, class, AIDS/HIV infection. 5. http://www.barnard.edu/history/faculty/jay/socialmovement/Gay%20and%20Lesbian/Gay_Outline4.html
V's wife. (sorry that it's long, but the information might be helpful to folks put in this context).
Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth
"... The homosexual movement has a history of trying to claw its way into places its agenda doesn’t belong, not for the betterment of mankind, but simply to legitimize and normalize perverse behavior. This is apparent in the all-too-common need of homosexuals to declare their sexuality rather than simply do the job they sign on to do.
This is extremely detrimental—first, it creates conflict with others as most believe homosexuality to be wrong, and it shows that the full efforts of the employed homosexual are not going towards performing the task at hand but largely to declaring their lifestyle. When it comes to serious concerns such as the Church, schools, and the Boy Scouts that involve our children, we can’t take the risk of giving them this power to destroy the values we as parents try to instill, nor can we put our country’s welfare at stake by turning these pivotal foundational institutions and our military into homosexual social experiments.
The homosexual movement is marked by two major tendencies: the tendency to continually infiltrate all good aspects of society; and once they have achieved that, the tendency to destroy this good. Public education, the Boy Scouts, the military, and now the Catholic Church have been targeted, and all have been hurt by the effects of homosexuality. The media and the Church must break its silence towards this enemy. If they do not, the people themselves must rise up and expose it..."
A 1994 cover article in Newsweek, titled "Homophobia", by John Leland, used as a foil and whipping boy a New England couple who were working against a town "anti-discrimination" ordinance (a pro-gay ordinance, in other words), imputing to them unfairness and hyperbolic argument in raising the fear that gays would demand the right to marry and to adopt children. Real tinfoilers and dirty fighters, this couple. Yeah, right.
It should be noted in passing that Leland, typical for Left Media people, lodged several of his important debating points against the couple by implication, not as flat statements -- nothing there that a defense attorney couldn't defend, but anyone with his head screwed on straight would take Leland's real meaning immediately. He wasn't reporting on the couple so much as arguing with them and contradicting them -- using a woman on the other side of the issue to lodge his complaint about fear-mongering. Typical Newsweek debating technique. Talk about slimy.
The Leftstream Media people lie like a rug, in the way that Soviet cops used to beat people half to death without ever leaving a mark.