Posted on 05/01/2002 12:27:47 PM PDT by NewsChick
I don't know if anyone else heard Rush today, but he continued with his usual bashing of all other talk radio hosts. Today, he said something along the lines of, "you listen to this show for five minutes and you'll get more information than you'll get from any other show in an hour."
I find it fascinating that Rush would continue to bash his fellow talk show hosts, basically "dissing" them, when many of them helped contribute to his success!
Remember the "Rush to Excellence" tours? I know of three talk hosts who not only picked up Rush at their local airports and drove him to the appearance, but also helped set up other things for him.
Many radio stations have a policy -- hosts are not allowed to bash each other -- the station wants to maintain a sense of "family" and that while talk hosts may disagree on topics, they're all one big happy.
It seems that Rush, and his ego-driven statements regarding "other talk shows" is going against the grain, and most local hosts would be, at the very least, dragged into the PD's office, if they were to go on the air and say something about Rush and his show prep.
Don't forget that he assured us that Bush #41 would win in '92 and Dole would beat Clinton in '96....
You need to learn to close your tags. If you don't know how please refrain from posting...it just makes you look silly.
I apologize for not closing my tags properly, but it does not detract from what I am saying.
And, as for being envious of Rush's success... never said that, never would. I'm a libertarian who has nothing but great admiration for Rush and his success. I hope he signs another multi-million dollar contract when this one expires! He just wouldn't be where he is if not for Ed McLaughlin. And yes, If Mr. McLaughlin had found another talk show host in which he spotted talent -- and there were more than just one of them out there in the mid 80s -- then we could have someone else who is every bit as successful as Rush. THAT's the point.
I think that most conservatives would settle for having the majority of what comes out of the White House our way. So far, we've gotten almost none of it our way. Bush has managed to go farther to the left than Gore would have ever managed. And it's because good Republicans like you will support Bush even when he does things that would have you screaming if Gore did them.
Perhaps the reason that conservatives are "trashing" Bush is that he deserves it.
But I do agree with you about one thing. Rush is boring, or was last time I listened to him.
But I do agree with you about one thing. Rush is boring, or was last time I listened to him.
President Bush does not deserve the relentless trashing that Rush dishes out. You wouldn't have had a tax cut under Gore, and if Jeffords hadn't defected, Bush's judges would have been approved. Expecting the impossible with Daschle as Senate leader is naive. Bush has many hurdles to overcome with those despicable democrats in the Senate, and CONSERVATIVE PERFECTION IS IMPOSSIBLE.
I write a letter to the editor each month informing people about the nefarious deed of democrats, and I encourage everyone to do the same. It's crucial to win the Senate back.
You wrote: Rush needed a "rabbi" to advance him and Ed McLaughlin was that person.The Rush that I listened to in the 80's and 90's, is not the same person on the radio today.There are lots of talkers in the industry who have the hunger, that Rush no longer has.
Bless you! That's exactly true!
But has he even tried? What have we gotten from Bush? A minute, temporary tax cut and nomination of a judge he refused to back when the going got rough.
That is more than outweighed by steel tariffs, campaign finance reform (AKA Anti-free speech law), the Patriot Act, increased government spending, failure to rescind any of Clinton's executive orders, etc., etc., etc.
Perfection? No. We're not demanding perfection. We just demand he stop delivering the left everthing they ask for and more. That would be enough for a start. Then we're willing to work on trying to get some of our agenda enacted.
Maybe you are being too sensitive. I fail to see the bashing in the statement you ascribe to Rush. I have heard Michael Savage, who is a very scary individual, bash Rush big time.
I'm glad for you. But you must understand that there are other of us who want someone a little less leftist. Some of us are not satisfied with Bush merely because he is not Bill Clinton. After all, so very few people are Bill Clinton.
Seriously though. If George Bush suits you, that's fine. But no one should be upset when people speak out against him. Last time I checked, we Americans were still allowed to criticize politicians when they did not do what we think is right.
By their fruits shall you know them. Bush has produced some pretty leftist fruit and I haven't really seen much conservative fruit from him. Talk, yes. Actions? Not yet.
There have been times I've switched over to another station when he's gone on and on about football, but that doesn't happen often. If Rush is nothing else, he is a great entertainer--and I personally think he is much more. To each his own, however.
Not so. Evidently you haven't heard Rush much, or you're forgetting the MANY times he has knocked Republicans. I even heard him say on more than one occason that the Republicans embarrassed him at times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.