FREEP THIS: WORLD CRIMINAL COURT POLL!!!!

Financial Times ^ | 5/2/02 | FreeUs FromGovt Out of Control

[RAT_Poison]

Freeped. Current numbers are 272 against and 184 for the ICC.

[canalabamian]

FREEPED! Now: 176/37% Yes 302/63% NO

[KLT]

LINK TO POLL

HERE'S THE ACTUAL PAGE...WE'RE DOIN IT GUYS...KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

[TheGrimReaper]

NO: 65%

Bump!

[Gone_Postal]

International Criminal Court - jury still out?

International Criminal Court - jury still out?
by FT.com  FT Administrator

#1 of 107
10 Apr 2002  04:39 PM

Poll Question:
Despite US threats and protests, the International Criminal Court became a reality on April 11 when several more countries ratified its treaty. The ICC will be the first global judicial institution to deal with the most serious crimes of international concern, marking an important step towards recognition of universal human rights. But the Bush administration is emphatic that there is no need for a world court, fearing that it could be used to ensnare US soldiers and politicians in "show trials". At an estimated annual cost of $25 to $40m initially a year, is such a court necessary and should the US back the idea?

[This message was edited by FT.com on 11 Apr 2002 at 05:44 PM.]

Results ( 507 votes counted so far):

Yes, the court is necessary and the US should back the idea	177/35%
No, the court is not necessary and US is right not to back the idea	330/65%

[wcbtinman]

Henry Bowman is the main character in John Ross's book "Unintended Consequences".

I highly reccomend it.

[CARepubGal]

65% = No! Voted and Freeped! :-)

[Ditter]

freeped it

[brat]

BUMP NO: 66%! And thankyou FRJr.

[be-baw]

freeped and bumped

[Capitalist Eric]

FReeped/Bumped/BTTT PING!

BTW, 66% against!

[madfly]

ping

[Cold Heat]

FReeped!....... Nice comment from the guy who said FR is a front for the Nazi party!LOL!

[KentuckyWoman]

Freeped and BUMP!

Now at 67% NO, 33% Yes.

Check this out, however:

Sounds good
by Al Jourgensen Guest #110 of 109
03 May 2002 03:30 PM
Sounds good to me

www.freerepublic.com is a front for the Nazi Party.

It's a shame this moron didn't leave an email address!!

[Don Myers]

Ok, its 68 percent for the good guys now.

[DoughtyOne]

Geez, read some of those misguided comments over there. Talk about an ungratefull bunch of a.h.s. You'd think they'd bailed our fat out of the fire twice. It's actually more than that when you realize we neutralized the U.S.S.R., set Saddam Hussein back more than a decade etc. All the while the Euroweenies slam us for having the power to do so. Those who slam us from Europe are about as ignorant as a human can be. Next time, I'll be damned if I'll advocate we lift a finger...

[Taxman]

Results ( 569 votes counted so far):

Yes, the court is necessary and the US should back the idea 182/32%

No, the court is not necessary and US is right not to back the idea 387/68%

“I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” [Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush, 1800.]

It would serve America well if all of our elected, appointed, Military and Civil Service persons were required to take that oath.

As I think about it, that might even be a worthwhile petition opportunity for the FRee Republic to take on.

What say you, FReepers?

[Bump in the night]

BTTT

[Alabama_Wild_Man]

Thanks - Voted as necessary. . .