Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
Rice is an anomaly in Republican corridors of power, which have long been dominated by a white, wealthy, old boys' network

What a lie. Herbert hoover was not wealthy. He was a middle class Iowa man who was an engineer by trade. Wendle Wilkee was not wealthy. And Tom Dewey was a prosecutor with no wealth. Ike was a farm boy. He spend his adult life living on an army salary. Nixon was the son of a lower middle class Quaker family. Jerry Ford was a very middle class man. Reagan was the son of an alcoholic store clerk. The Bush's are a mildly wealthy family but the Cheney family is not.

On the Democratic side FDR was from a rich and powerful New York Family that had been rich since New York was New Amsterdamm. Harry Truman was not rich, but Adlai Stevenson was. Kennedy was rich and Jimmy Carter was not. Clinton was not rich. But no Republican is as rich as Ross Perot. And almost all the super rich are Democrats. Buffet, Gates, Ford, Vanderbuilt, and Rockefeller are all Democrats. The Presidents of GE, Merril Lynch, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner,and Boeing are all Democrats. The presidents of the New York times, Washington Post, LA times and CNN are all Democrats.

If Democrats are the party of the poor, how come all the super rich people are Democrats?


4 posted on 05/06/2002 8:22:39 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Common Tator
RE # 4:

Because the DemoRATS, just like the Communists, are an unbeatable alliance of the guilt ridden rich and the lumps plus an odd assortment of envy consumed low class working stiffs and middle class working stiffs who think themselves poorer than they are.

5 posted on 05/06/2002 8:31:09 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
Another good question is why are we so bad at pointing out this fact? Almost all the movies stars are dems, and they are very rich. All of the union bosses, CEO's of charities, etc. are pretty well off as well, and they are democrats.

I am tired of this malarkey, and we need to point out the truth.

6 posted on 05/06/2002 8:36:13 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
RE: #4
Great points! I have ripped your post into a file I keep of such insightful goodies for use in self defense against the lefties in my scooter club. By your leave, I will include a link to this thread if I roll this out in the never ending flame war that is our biker "brotherhood."
9 posted on 05/06/2002 9:19:09 PM PDT by j_tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
What a lie. Herbert hoover was not wealthy,

Not to disagree with the main premise of your post but this part is incorrect. Herbert Hoover most certainly was wealthy. He was born to a poor to lower-middle class family in Iowa and orphaned at age nine, but through his own industriousness (common Quaker trait) he became a millionaire several times over before he became president (and one quite often unfairly maligned).

12 posted on 05/07/2002 6:41:55 AM PDT by cschroe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
We've also had a native American as vice-president. Charles Curtis, vp to Hoover, was a descendent of a Kaw chief who assisted the Lewis and Clark expedition. He had formerly served as member of the House and Senate and as Senate majority leader.
13 posted on 05/07/2002 6:53:53 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson