Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vance
Each apparently with a combo platter of conflicting and unsubstantiated theories. Hardly a modicum of hard fact in any of them.

No Proof! Inneundo! Hearsay! Let's move on...and do the Lanny Davis Cha-Cha-Cha!

It is the categorical denials which makes this story fascinating. The Clinton excuses. The curious fact that a group of people on FR denied this was true from day one before they could know what happened. The same people who now have zero interest in examining this story but resort to blanket denials and claims this is "tin-foil hat" stuff or motivated by antisemitism.

52 posted on 05/08/2002 1:14:08 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: LarryLied
The spy aspect and the reports on which it was based were flimsy from the gitgo. Like Clinton's denial of sex with Monica. Any fool could see he was lying. We did not need the facts to know that, just as the spy art student idea was ludicrious and based on nothing.
55 posted on 05/08/2002 1:20:26 PM PDT by vance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson