Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeweyCA
It seems like the other proposals provided so far on this thread don't have a definitive answer as to why the birth canal has continued to be small compared to the baby's head.

Because there's another head before the baby's that prefers the canal to be smaller ... ?

36 posted on 05/09/2002 5:06:58 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
Because there's another head before the baby's that prefers the canal to be smaller ... ?

You may have a point there ;-D

47 posted on 05/09/2002 6:17:29 PM PDT by BMCDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson