Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
Wouldn't necessarily need gov't certs. That's wastepaper anyway, as far as I am concerned! Just show the seller that you know how to use properly and store safely. Some folks DO OWN such stuff now... and do so safely, despite the roadblocks thrown up by the BATFags...
362 posted on 05/20/2002 10:21:51 AM PDT by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc
"Just show the seller that you know how to use properly and store safely."

That could be done rather easily for an M-16. Now, how are you going to do that for a 155MM howitzer? And, there is the small thing about having a suitable range for demonstrating proficiency. Shifting the burden of certification from the government to the seller doesn't really address any of these things. There still must be a certification standard that ensures safe storage and operation. Considering the damage one can do with your own howitzer, I would suggest it should be rather high. Also, a howitzer requires a crew and that means crew drill. It's an awful lot more than just cramming a round in the breech and yanking the landyard. Things like setting powder charges, what to do if there's a hang-fire, laying the piece, etc.

I will admit that machine guns, M-60 size or less, seem to fall into a debatable grey area. M-16s and other full auto individual weapons fall on one side of that area and I see no restriction for individual ownership. You get much above a M-60 and I begin to believe that one should proceed with utmost caution in advocating individual ownership without restriction.

363 posted on 05/20/2002 2:46:13 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson