Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth Punctured By Tiny Cosmic Missles
The Telegraph ^ | 5-12-2002 | Robert Matthews

Posted on 05/11/2002 6:11:38 PM PDT by blam

Earth punctured by tiny cosmic missiles

By Robert Matthews, Science Correspondent
(Filed: 12/05/2002)

FORGET dangers from giant meteors: Earth is facing another threat from outer space. Scientists have come to the conclusion that two mysterious explosions in the 1990s were caused by bizarre cosmic missiles.

The two objects were picked up by earthquake detectors as they tore through Earth at up to 900,000 mph. According to scientists, the most plausible explanation is that they were "strangelets", clumps of matter that have so far defied detection but whose existence was posited 20 years ago.

Formed in the Big Bang and inside extremely dense stars, strangelets are thought to be made from quarks - the subatomic particles found inside protons and neutrons. Unlike ordinary matter, however, they also contain "strange quarks", particles normally only seen in high-energy accelerators.

Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.

They are thought to be extremely stable, travelling through the galaxy at speeds of about a million miles per hour. Until now, all attempts to detect them have failed. A team of American scientists believes, however, that it may have found the first hard evidence for the existence of strangelets, after scouring earthquake records for signs of their impact with Earth.

The team, from the Southern Methodist University in Texas, analysed more than a million earthquake reports, looking for the tell-tale signal of strangelets hitting Earth.

While their very high speed gives strangelets a huge amount of energy their tiny size suggests that any effects might be extremely localised, and there is unlikely to be a blast big enough to have widespread effects on the surface.

The scientists looked for events producing two sharp signals, one as it entered Earth, the other as it emerged again. They found two such events, both in 1993. The first was on the morning of October 22. Seismometers in Turkey and Bolivia recorded a violent event in Antarctica that packed the punch of several thousand tons of TNT. The disturbance then ripped through Earth on a route that ended with it exiting through the floor of the Indian Ocean off Sri Lanka just 26 seconds later - implying a speed of 900,000 mph.

The second event took place on November 24, when sensors in Australia and Bolivia picked up an explosion starting in the Pacific south of the Pitcairn Islands and travelling through Earth to appear in Antarctica 19 seconds later.

According to the scientists, both events are consistent with an impact with strangelets at cosmic speeds. In a report about to be submitted to the Seismological Society of America, the team of geologists and physicists concludes: "The only explanation for such events of which we are aware is passage through the earth of ton-sized strange-quark nuggets."

Professor Eugene Herrin, a member of the team, said that two strangelets just one-tenth the breadth of a hair would account for the observations. "These things are extremely dense and travel at 40 times the speed of sound straight through the Earth - they'd hardly slow down as they went through."

The good news is that, despite their force, the impact of strangelets on an inhabited area would, probably, be less violent than that of a meteor. Prof Herrin said: "It's very hard to determine what the effect would be. There would probably be a tiny crater but it would be virtually impossible to find anything."

Scientists say that the discovery of strangelets would be a significant breakthrough, solving several long-standing mysteries. These include the nature of "dark matter", which, astronomers say, makes up more than 90 per cent of our galaxy. With their high density and stability, strangelets may account for much of this invisible matter.

Prof Frank Close, a particle physicist at Oxford University, said that confirmation of the events was crucial. "The first step is to see if one can find more examples and eliminate all other interpretations," he said. "If you're looking for very exotic and rare events, you need to be able to tell if it's the real thing or just an artefact."

According to Prof Herrin, the two events agree with predictions for strangelet impacts, which are expected to occur about once a year. He added, however, that finding more would be difficult, as seismic databases now automatically remove all signals not linked to earthquakes. He said: "To find more events we need to get at the data before that happens."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cosmic; earth; missles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Kermit
186,282mps + or - 3 (per second)
41 posted on 05/11/2002 9:01:28 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kermit
I always thought it was funny how photons are supposedly mass free, which would defy the laws that all other particles follow. I mean, if the speed of light rule holds, and you admit that photons have mass like everything else, then a photon traveling at light speed would have almost infinite mass, and every time you turned on a flashlight, you'd wipe out a large swath of the immediate solar system. Sounds flawed to me. Oh yeah, that article on tachyons travelling faster than light seemed to violate that principle as well, but then, I always figured tachyons had to travel faster than light, or they wouldn't appear to move backward in time. Maybe someone with a better understanding of physics can explain the inconsistencies.
42 posted on 05/11/2002 9:36:53 PM PDT by TheLurkerX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
There I was driving along and bang, the back tire blows out for no reason. It had to be one of these, what else could it have been.

Goodyear Eagles perhaps?

43 posted on 05/11/2002 11:10:40 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
For the record: I have nothing whatever to do with that.

Well, you've certainly blown holes in a few threads! ;-]

44 posted on 05/11/2002 11:12:45 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Ok, but what if it hits one of the inhabitants of an inhabited are?

Jello!

45 posted on 05/11/2002 11:14:01 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheLurkerX
Could you let me know if anyone answers your question? Thanks.
46 posted on 05/12/2002 12:50:05 AM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Cloaked & lurking ...

47 posted on 05/12/2002 3:56:06 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: blam
Strangelets - sometimes also called strange-quark nuggets - are predicted to have many unusual properties, including a density about ten million million times greater than lead. Just a single pollen-size fragment is believed to weigh several tons.

My wife made some meatballs out of this stuff once...

48 posted on 05/12/2002 5:30:22 AM PDT by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Then again, if a group of kids with an armful of bottle-rockets in the USA coordinated with a group of similarly minded kids in the Ukraine, with an armful of Roman Candles,..by their parent's cell phone and unused ham radio, synchronized watches,......

I think I see where this is heading....

49 posted on 05/12/2002 5:43:42 AM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
" Basically, you split a molecule (or atom, I can never recall), and regardless of their relationship to one another, they will behave exactly alike. I believe it's involved in super string theory."

Yup. I've read 'stuff' like that too. Basically, they're traveling away from each other at about 9/10's the speed of light and if you influence one of the particles (cause it to flip with magnets) the other will do the same. Now, the question is, "what sort of communication is going on between these two" and whatever it is, it has to be traveling well above the speed of light.

There's an interesting article in this months Discover magazine by John Wheeler, titled, "Does The Universe Exist If We're Not Looking?" It deals with human conciousness influencing the future as well as the past. Interesting reading.

50 posted on 05/12/2002 5:45:31 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
"I think I see where this is heading...."

Radio waves do not travel at 900,000 MPH so, your plot would be exposed. (The time intervel between the two events would be revealing)

51 posted on 05/12/2002 5:49:04 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: blam
Radio waves might not travel that fast, but even adolescent teenagers with an armful of Roman Candles can calculate! ;^)
52 posted on 05/12/2002 6:08:45 AM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wheeler's article in Discover has a fascinating thought experiment.

A photon leaving a 10 billion light-year distant quasar has two possible (diverging and then converging) paths around a gravitational lens and a two paths are equally possible.

"Classical" quantum mechanics says that neither path is chosen until the probabilities are collapsed by observation.
Our act of observing causes the photon to "have taken" one path or another.

This is not conjecture or speculation, but well confirmed.

53 posted on 05/12/2002 6:14:18 AM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
If such a highly abnormal velocity and momentum are implied, perhaps considering the exit point as the entrance would be more plausible.
54 posted on 05/12/2002 6:19:22 AM PDT by Cvengr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
Firestone tires, especially if underinflated.
55 posted on 05/12/2002 6:30:59 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
...
Ok, these stranglets are 0.1 mm in diameter and 1000 kg at 400,000 m/s
Thats 40 gigawatts in the 19 seconds it is passing through the Earth. (if all energy were consumed... which it is not)
The energy is about a quarter of the Hiroshima device.

So, what would a meteorite of the same energy look like?
If that had been a typical meteorite (of density=5 g/cm^3) of the same energy it would be 20x20x20 feet and travelling at 25000 mph.

Your reference to unobtainium, and the ease which which strangelets go through the Earth's iron core:
I guess the real-world analogy is the depleted uranium rounds going through tank armor like butter. Well, the density is an instructive analogy, but the speed isn't.

What I find interesting is the seemingly unending succession of surprises we get from nature.

56 posted on 05/12/2002 7:11:35 AM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam
Good Lord, with Algore coming back from the dead, don't I have Enough to worry about?
57 posted on 05/12/2002 7:24:41 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: edwin hubble
"Our act of observing causes the photon to "have taken" one path or another."

Hence, Wheeler's speculation about the past being changed once observations are made.

59 posted on 05/12/2002 7:47:42 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Ok, but what if it hits one of the inhabitants of an inhabited are?

We've just found the explanation for spontaneous combustion :^)

60 posted on 05/12/2002 8:09:35 AM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson