Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY RUSH IS DISGRUNTLED (Bush is advancing the Democrats most liberal agenda )
Rush Limbaugh ^ | 5/13/2002 | rushlimbaugh

Posted on 05/13/2002 3:12:19 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

WHY RUSH IS DISGRUNTLED

On Monday's show, the Doctor of Democracy made a sad diagnosis: "If the Reagan Revolution is not dead, then it's dying." If there was a model that the Bush administration used in establishing itself, it was the Reagan presidency. But now Bush is advancing the Democrats' most liberal agenda items - something particularly frustrating at a time when Bush's popularity would make it easy for him to recruit new conservatives.

Many of you have been critical of Rush's reactions to Bush's actions on spending over the recent months, and we took more calls of this sort on Monday - people who'd convinced themselves that the farm bill made sense or that Bush had some grand strategery at play. Now, Rush could throw his beliefs out the window for a day or two and say things that you might want to hear - like when he endorsed Clinton back in 1992 - but that's not what he does.

Rush can only give you his honest reaction, even when he doesn't like those reactions. That's honesty, folks, and it goes to disprove a key criticism many of the nation's liberals have made of Rush over the years. They've said that Rush is a party hack, and that he'd support the Republican Party no matter what they did. They charged that the EIB Network was simply a tool, that we were in daily contact with the powers that be to get marching orders. Well, that has pretty much been dispelled here: Rush is disgruntled.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bush; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 481-486 next last
To: seanc623
Clever, but I suggest you ask ex-Senator Slade Gorton of Washington about how much difference my party has made to Republicans who go back on their word (especially the 2nd Amendment). New Senator Maria Cantwell defeated him by a lot less than the 2% our "insignificant" candidate captured. While you're at it you can ask Senator Jon Ensign of Nevada why he didn't win his election in '98 instead of 2000 (again, a Libertarian received many more votes than the difference between Ensign and the Democrat).

You just made a great case to vote AGAINST Libertarians! How any conservative could brag about putting Cantwell in office is beyond my comprehension. Your vote is a gift to the Liberals just as a vote for the Green Party is a gift to the Conservatives.

121 posted on 05/13/2002 5:20:16 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: thucydides; RJAyneJ
He has to carefully pick his issues, just as Reagan did. Reagan lost ground on government spending, but he did get extremely high tax rates down, he gave the economy an enormous boost, and he ended the Cold War with the collapse of the Soviet Union without a shot being fired. Bush is out to make our lives safer, and to repair some of the enormous damage to national security done during the Clinton years. Meanwhile, he is going along with a lot of nauseating stuff because he really has no choice.

My nomination for Qoute of the Day!

122 posted on 05/13/2002 5:23:10 PM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: thucydides
He has to carefully pick his issues, just as Reagan did. Reagan lost ground on government spending, but he did get extremely high tax rates down, he gave the economy an enormous boost, and he ended the Cold War with the collapse of the Soviet Union without a shot being fired. Bush is out to make our lives safer, and to repair some of the enormous damage to national security done during the Clinton years. Meanwhile, he is going along with a lot of nauseating stuff because he really has no choice. If he gets a better Congress in the Fall, he will improve.

Right on the money. You da man!

123 posted on 05/13/2002 5:24:52 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
You just made a great case to vote AGAINST Libertarians! How any conservative could brag about putting Cantwell in office is beyond my comprehension. Your vote is a gift to the Liberals just as a vote for the Green Party is a gift to the Conservatives.

Easy... I'm not a conservative, I'm a Libertarian. I wasn't bragging about getting Cantwell elected, I was bragging about costing Gorton the election because he flip-flopped on guns. One of the reasons I became a Libertarian is to punish Republicans like him for pretending to be something they're not. Since the only language they seem to understand is brute force, that's the way we'll communicate with them. I'm sure he never thought a lowly Libertarian like Jeff Jared could cost him reelection; well now he knows better. Save your tears for the hunters and sportsmen of his state, you know the ones he sold out so he could appeal to the left-wing gun grabbers who wound up not voting for him anyway.

124 posted on 05/13/2002 5:30:16 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Thank you for your post! You posted some items I had completely forgotten! Thread has been bookmarked for future reference. Thanks again!
125 posted on 05/13/2002 5:30:55 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ALL
I stopped listening to Rush daily, three or four years ago, when he spent THREE hours talking about toe fungus, instead of Clinton and / or current events. He'd been losing me, for a very long time. If one reads FR, one does NOT need to listen to Rush !

I've tuned in, every now and again, over the ensuing years, only to find that Rush had gotten worse. This incesant Bush Bashing, is boring, counter productive, and isn't doing Rush any good either. He has more people complaing about this, than he has comlmentary E-mails. He hates this, and lost it, on air, several times in the past few weeks. His bloated ego can't take it. The emperor has NO clothes at all, now.

Unlike fringers and political naifs here, Rush actually does know that NO president is Emperor , with unilateral / complete power to do whatever he so desires to do. There are THREE branches of government, and the president doesn't make laws, nor is he able to repeal whatever was done prior to his administration, my saying so. So, this new act, that Rush has instigated, is a losing one, for him, as well as for those few ( who used to hate him / call him names here ) who are now suddenly championing him.

O'Reilly has NOTHING at all to do with this. Rush is a lazy man, who is pompous, arrogant, out of the political loop ( Newtie is no longer feeding him stuff ) , and long ago lost the " fire in the belly " , which made him not only interesting to listen to, but made those who listened to him, feel part of a group of similar , right thinking people. FR, and the FOX CABLE NEWS channel, have made Rushs's show , and Rush, far less relivant and important.

126 posted on 05/13/2002 5:31:06 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
bump
127 posted on 05/13/2002 5:32:08 PM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I don't know if you consider the Senate to be one of the "minority factions" but 50 RATs, 49 Pubs, and 1 Independent is not a minority.

Nope...I wasn't referring to them.

128 posted on 05/13/2002 5:32:25 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ricer1
A quick perusal of the latest Justin Raimondo anti-war screed is usually enough to scare me back into line. The other issue is immigration, which is the one area of policy where dogmatic libertarians have managed to get a foothold.
129 posted on 05/13/2002 5:32:55 PM PDT by TN Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
"Rush has done far more for conservatives than GW has done."

George Bush is a B I G disappointment. As usual, Rush is right. GW deserves to be bashed.

130 posted on 05/13/2002 5:33:00 PM PDT by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican
Newt's Republicans managed to decrease this kind of spending in 1996.

The Republicans under the leadership of Newt passed that smaller Farm Subsidy Bill. Then the Mississippi or Missouri flooded and the whopping supplementals started. There was no way the Republicans could withstand the media chorus directed by Daschle and Gephart: "You can't be meanspirited enough to turn your back on suffering flood victims." And they piled huge supplementals onto the flood relief bills, and probably every other bill that went through congress after that.

Newt tried to say that what the Dems were doing was wrong and against the spirit of the Farm Subsidy bill that had just been passed. He might as well have been shouting in a hurricane. No one listened when he tried to hold down the spending.

131 posted on 05/13/2002 5:33:34 PM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: seanc623; All
One of the reasons I became a Libertarian is to punish Republicans like him for pretending to be something they're not.

Well! There you have it, folks!

A vote, not for principle, but for punishment. Well, at least you're honest.

132 posted on 05/13/2002 5:34:08 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Rush survives on ratings and listeners. Never forget that. Rush is NOT "always right", as in the case of his Bush-bashing comments. But hey, it get's people to pay attention to him. Personally I can't stnad him, never have and never will.
133 posted on 05/13/2002 5:34:40 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3;seanc623
I've been looking, trying to find Jim Rob's view on voting 3rd party and how it is actually a vote for a Clinton dem. He posted it on a thread a couple of months ago but the find a poster search doesn't go back that far. It certainly backs up the "Thanks for helping elect Cantwell" statement.
134 posted on 05/13/2002 5:37:34 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Ron Paul will make more difference in one day on the Hill than any other Libertarian that has made local office.

My goodness! I agree with you!

135 posted on 05/13/2002 5:37:43 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: terilyn; JimRob
I've been looking, trying to find Jim Rob's view on voting 3rd party and how it is actually a vote for a Clinton dem.

Well, here's a ping to da boss. I'm sure he'll tell you his view on this.

136 posted on 05/13/2002 5:40:18 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Let me ask you a question: Does the coup d'etat in the Senate factor in to your criticism of Dubya?

Of course it does... the coup d'etat couldn't have happened without him. Like his father before him who supported Jeffords for reelection against real conservatives (especially in '86) Bush II has made and is making the same mistakes. The big tent is a death sentence for Republicans (at least those who are Constitutionally correct instead of politically correct).

137 posted on 05/13/2002 5:40:35 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: maica
< Qoute of the Day!

Oops! Should learn to spell Quote!

138 posted on 05/13/2002 5:41:02 PM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: terilyn
I think what we are seeing is the two conservatisms slamming into each other
139 posted on 05/13/2002 5:41:26 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: maica
Thanks for the nomination! };^D )
140 posted on 05/13/2002 5:41:30 PM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson