Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
Borderline populations of organisms, i.e., those living closest to the "edge" of the conditions to which they are adapted, will be the most stressed by environmental change.

This is wrong. An "edge" has two sides. A change will benefit organsims on one side of the edge, and hurt the other.
56 posted on 05/17/2002 11:55:16 AM PDT by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: self_evident
This is wrong. An "edge" has two sides. A change will benefit organsims on one side of the edge, and hurt the other.

This is directed at one specific population of organisms. The Hudson Bay polar bears are the southernmost population of polar bears in the world. A warming trend (and specifically a change in sea ice dynamics) will affect them first and more drastically than polar bear populations in colder zones.

I think what you're saying is that other populations may expand their range. That's true and it's also an indicator. So I should have said that borderline populations will be stressed most by an environmental trend that is negative with respect to their survivability. Other borderline populations could be augmented by the same trend because it is positive with respect to their survivability. Right?

59 posted on 05/17/2002 12:01:27 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson