Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mondonico
It IS old news, old news made new again by lying Democrats. The question I want answered by Daschle and Gephardt is, WHY NOW? Why did they all of a sudden feel the need to attack the President with information they had months, even years ago? The answer, I'm sure is simple: November 2002.
2 posted on 05/18/2002 1:50:12 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rintense
Senator warned of terror threat in '98 (Chattanooga Times)
By Andy Sher, Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Nearly three years before terrorists flew hijacked jetliners into the World Trade Center and Pentagon on Sept. 11, U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., was urging Clinton administration officials to prepare Americans for the potential attacks by Osama bin Laden here in the United States.

"If we are going to be in or expecting more of these kinds of attacks, both domestically and with regard to our embassies abroad and our other targets abroad, we need to know that," the senator told then-FBI Director Louis Freeh.

"And the American people need to get ready for that," Sen. Thompson said. "And they need to be convinced that we need to do the things necessary to confront that."

Sen. Thompson's comments were made during a Sept. 3, 1998, Senate Judiciary Committee meeting. Days before, the Clinton administration ordered missiles fired into Sudan and Afghanistan in retaliation for suspected al-Qaida-sponsored bombings of U.S embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Today, there is a furor over what President Bush and his administration knew before Sept. 11, 2001, about potential terror attacks.

Sen. Thompson, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said it isn't fair to blame President Bush for a system he "inherited." The senators said not enough was done previously.

"That's one of the unfortunate things about what's happening right now," Sen. Thompson said. "We're focusing in on a single matter when we've ignored the elephant in the living room for some years. We've had public hearings. We've had public statements by public officials of all kinds, describing threats and potential terrorist vulnerabilities.

"It's hard to get people's attention until something actually happens," Sen. Thompson said.

Sen. Thompson said the latest flap is "a tempest in a teapot."

"I've seen a dozen reports of serious kinds of threats, not specific in terms of time and place," he said. "Most of the time nothing ever happens, and they're so general you can't take any specific action on them. The real issue here is why didn't we have more information and why didn't we have people connecting dots?"

The problems include inadequate funding for intelligence operations, insufficient use of "human intelligence" and an intelligence culture that at times has been "too satisfied" with itself, he said.

The intelligence committees will delve into the matter, but it should not be a "witch hunt," he said.

"I think individual members will continue to make irresponsible statements," Sen. Thompson said. "You can't stop dogs from chasing cars."


4 posted on 05/18/2002 1:56:02 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
What did Gepart and Dashle know? When did they know it?

I question the democrats timing on this.

5 posted on 05/18/2002 1:56:08 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
Once again the Dems dominate the news, including Foxnews. When ever the Clinton about to get caught on another scandal or treasonist conduct the RATS coming running out of their holes and straight to the networks to spin another web. The news media cares more about ratings than this country or the American people. Hillary was exposed for her terrorist ties and money she was getting from them. So did HIllary have inside information to the attacks. Clinton was warned and did nothing knowing he could push the blame on the next President. Hillary was on the inside of these terrorists groups, they were not handing over millions of dollars for no reason, I'm sure they wanted something for their money. They needed Hillary in office and in return did Hillary use them to set up Pres.Bush. Our FBI and their job to protect this country first. So why didn't the FBI allert the American people of HIllary's activities? The NewYork Times never misses a Clinton stink and I'm sure the NY times new of Hillary's meeting with terrorist groups. HILLARY NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE. I urge everyone to flood the office of you Senaiiiiiitors, Representatives and news media to call for Hillary to resign for her treasonist conduct. Gephardt is illegally holding on to his Senate seat, the constitution requires him to remove the corruption from our Government, if not than he must also resign. Gephardt choice to cover up for Gary Condit and not remove him that automaticly removes Gephardt from office. Trafficant has also been found guilty must remove Trafficant if not than they must resign.
11 posted on 05/18/2002 2:38:35 PM PDT by rebapiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson