I believe you!
But you need some intelligence when you decide what to believe>
Would you believe this which is at the emperors-clothes.com site:
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Regarding the involvement of high officials in 9-11, we have studied:
* a) the failure of the air safety and air defense systems to carry out long-standing, well-practiced, routine procedures;
* b) the actual behavior of these officials, which demonstrates consciousness of guilt and
* c) various attempted media cover-ups of a) and b), which cover-ups provide additional evidence of official guilt.
One thing we have not commented on is the debate over the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers.
Some argue that the towers were brought down by explosives. Others (including defenders of the official story on 9-11) insist that the towers collapsed because fire weakened the steel support structure.
Regardless of why the buildings collapsed, the crucial evidence of official guilt is that the air safety and air defense systems were made to 'stand down' on 9-11.
That said, on September 14th we did post an interesting article from the 'Albuquerque Journal' concerning the WTC towers.
It is based on an interview with Van Romero, the director of research at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
Mr. Romero:
'studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.'
His research institute:
'assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.'
It is funded, at least in part, by grants from the Pentagon.
Van Romero studied the videos of the WTC collapse and concluded that the towers were most likely destroyed by carefully placed demolition charges. He told the 'Journal':
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that."