Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey: 7 percent of elementary school children diagnosed with ADHD (Stupid Kid Alert)
Atlanta Journal Constitution | 5-22-02 | M.A.J. McKENNA

Posted on 05/22/2002 6:19:33 AM PDT by Lance Romance

Survey: 7 percent of elementary school children diagnosed with ADHD

By M.A.J. McKENNA
Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer

Nearly 7 percent of elementary-age children in the United States -- more than 1.6 million kids -- have been diagnosed with attention-deficit disorder, according to the first nationwide survey of the problem.

The numbers are higher than expected, the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Tuesday.

"The American Academy of Pediatrics has estimated an overall rate of 3 to 5 percent of children," said Patricia Pastor, a health statistician and the study's lead author. Regional studies have shown from 4 percent to 12 percent of kids' having ADD. The CDC study also found that 7.7 percent of children -- 1.8 million -- have learning disabilities.

The two disorders overlap: 2.6 million children have either ADD or a learning disability or both. Overall, 3.3 percent of all children in that age group have ADD, 4.2 percent have learning disabilities, and 3.5 percent have both conditions, the agency said. The nationwide survey of 78,041 households was conducted for the CDC by the U.S. Census Bureau in 1997 and 1998. It asked parents if children aged 6-11 in their household had ever been diagnosed with ADD by a doctor or other health care professional, or been diagnosed with a learning disability by a health care professional or school official.

Among the findings:

D ADD is at least twice as common in boys as in girls; learning disabilities are equally common in both genders.

D White children are more likely than blacks or Hispanics to be diagnosed with ADD.

The results of the study suggest that access to health care may have a much greater influence on diagnosis than had been realized, Pastor said. Children whose families had private insurance or Medicaid and could consult a health professional were more likely to be diagnosed with ADD than those without insurance.

The study did not break down the results by state or city.

Georgia has had a reputation as a hotbed for ADD. In 1994, it was ranked No. 1 in the country for cumulative consumption of methylphenidate, an anti-ADD stimulant marketed as Ritalin. By last year, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration, the state was 17th in methylphenidate use.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: educationnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-170 next last
White children are more likely than blacks or Hispanics to be diagnosed with ADD.

I be oppressed.

1 posted on 05/22/2002 6:19:33 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
I know you were just being flippant, but your "Stupid Kid Alert" is less than funny to me. One of my sons is learning disabled with a short term memory problem that we spent years dealing with. It is not fun by any stretch of the imagination. In fact it is a lot of work for parents, teachers, and child. He is no longer in school (he dropped out of HS) but the problem remains. So go easy on the name calling unless you've earned the privelege by living through it.
2 posted on 05/22/2002 6:25:55 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
There was an article yesterday about a company making a powdered form of the drog to mix with applesouce pr cerial.

Funny, they will put adults in jail for using drugs anf threaten to take away their kids if they don't give them grugs. Hmmmmmmm.

3 posted on 05/22/2002 6:28:36 AM PDT by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
There was an article yesterday about a company making a powdered form of the drog to mix with applesouce pr cerial.
Funny, they will put adults in jail for using drugs anf threaten to take away their kids if they don't give them grugs. Hmmmmmmm.

Please tell me you were half asleep when you typed this. ;-)

4 posted on 05/22/2002 6:34:13 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
I think your "Stupid Kid Alert" is way out of line.

"Nearly 7 percent of elementary-age children in the United States -- more than 1.6 million kids -- have been diagnosed with attention-deficit disorder"

That fact DOES NOT MEAN that 1.6 million kids ACTUALLY HAVE attention-deficit disorder, or that they're "stupid".
There is a LOT of mis-diagnosis of this (some pressured by parents, some pressured by teachers, some pressured by drug companies).
Don't blame the kids for what their parents do to them.

5 posted on 05/22/2002 6:35:08 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
I don't doubt that some children have this problem (disorder?). But 7%??? That number is just too high.

But I don't doubt that at least 7% of elementary school children are undisciplined and unruly, and that there are those who have an interest in drugging them, rather than investing the time and patience and love necessary to correct the behavior.

6 posted on 05/22/2002 6:36:15 AM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
Coming from a family involved in the education system for over 30 years, I have to say that the number of children prescribed this drug to calm them is a lot higher than 7%
7 posted on 05/22/2002 6:41:42 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
As an adult with ADD my IQ is a bit over the stupid range and as a CPA my performance is a tad above average.
8 posted on 05/22/2002 6:44:43 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
I don't doubt that some children have this problem (disorder?). But 7%??? That number is just too high.

On what basis do you make the claim "its too high" ?

How many people in the population benefit from corrective lenses ? Like eyesight, ADD presents itself across a range. Everything from blind to needing reading glasses.

Applying the range theory to the 7%, those at one end of the range may cope just fine while those at the other end may not.

9 posted on 05/22/2002 6:49:07 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Behave yourself!

He got the "Hmmmmmmm." right.;)

10 posted on 05/22/2002 6:58:56 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Behave yourself!

Yes, dear. ;-)

11 posted on 05/22/2002 7:02:22 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
My assumption, from reading the article, especially the end of it, is that 7% need (or have been prescribed) ritalin. Perhaps that is an incorrect assumption.

My statement that the 7% figure was "too high" is opinion and conjecture. Mixed with disbelief that 7% of elementary school children need ritalin.

You are correct in pointing out that I have no documented evidence to support this opinion. Is it your opinion that 7% need ritalin?

12 posted on 05/22/2002 7:02:56 AM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
Calm down. I have a problem with a study like this being released from the CDC. I see this article as yet another excuse for the medical profession to medicate kids. And another excuse for kids to sit in front of the TV zoned into the latest video game.

My dad had a cure for this, he would remove the plug from the TV and hand us a list of chores to be accomplished. If we still had attention problems, some cursing and a belt was utilized to help us regain focus.

13 posted on 05/22/2002 7:16:54 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
We are not told how many of these families are receiving a govt check because of this diagnoses. I know of children in at least four different states who were/are on drugs for no better reason than acting as children always have if not controlled by the teacher or parent as the case may be. No doubt there are genuine cases of ADHD but I am convinced from personal observation that additional cases have been piggybacked on to them because of govt checks and/or an easy solution to rowdy behavior. In some cases drugs are simply given to enhance achievement and not because of behavior problems. My guess is that this 7 percent is less than the actual number of students being drugged. School administrations probably view the use of these drugs as an alternative to being sued if they try to enforce discipline in the class room. In all cases, it is the child grown into an adult that lives with the consequences of taking these drugs in their formative years.
14 posted on 05/22/2002 7:23:43 AM PDT by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Lance Romance
"Calm down"

Believe me. I am quite calm. Your problem with the CDC and over medication of children may have a basis in fact. Your reference to kids, with real, honest to God learning disabilities, as stupid is feckless. I am trying to educate you so that your ignorance doesn't interfere with any points you might make that have merit.

16 posted on 05/22/2002 7:27:11 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
Is it your opinion that 7% need ritalin?

First the word need I object to. Only a very small number of ADD folks actually NEED ritalin. That said it may be entirely possible that the entire ADD population would benefit from ritalin but the desicion tree is slightly more complex than simple yes or no. Before going too far, I believe that many ADD diagnoses are not correct and therefore whatever percent of diagnosed ADD'ers there are the actual number needs to be reduced for misdiagnosed but at the same time it needs to be increased for undiagnosed. For example, many children may have depression, alergies, simple behavior problems etc.

Whether drugs ae appropriare, some of factors include the fact that Ritalin and other drug therapies come with side-effects that must be weighed. In addition, ritalin and other drugs are not effective 24/7 and therefore the individual still needs to learn alternative coping mechanisms and use of ritalin can retard that.

At the other end of the spectrum are children who have very little likelihood of being able to stay focused long enough to teach any coping skills to.

In summary, of the total population of ADD'ers less than all could benefit from drugs. Some may need them all the time and some may need them at times.

But I have no predetermined idea how many are in the population. If I had to guess the population would mirror eyeglass wearers especially in that the needs for glasses change in response to age and tasks.

17 posted on 05/22/2002 7:27:37 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
ADD comes from parents that do not watch over,take care and discipline their children along with a little use of drugs in the past.Now I know that isnt always the case but it is the majority.Also it doesnt mean in all cases the drugs were illegal.Then we turn around and put the children on Ritalin and what is Ritalin?
18 posted on 05/22/2002 7:28:44 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk
In some cases drugs are simply given to enhance achievement and not because of behavior problems

ADD is not a behavior problem. It is a performance problem.

19 posted on 05/22/2002 7:30:20 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah
Now I know that isnt always the case but it is the majority

How do you KNOW the majority of those diagonsed with ADD are not ADD ? Is there a study you can point to ?

20 posted on 05/22/2002 7:33:14 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
If your problem (and attitude) are with the study, then you could have used 'stupid study alert' instead of maligning the kids! I'm the mother of a 17 year-old boy with ADD. He is a very intelligent and interesting kid but has almost no attention span and a lot of problems in school and elsewhere as a result.

And for all the anti-Ritalin busybodies who think they have all the answers, no, he isn't on medication. It's a problem we deal with the best we can, but it does have a major impact on the family life.

21 posted on 05/22/2002 7:35:35 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: gunnedah
Really. And where do you get this information from, Einstein? Is it based in fact or just your 'learned' opinion?
23 posted on 05/22/2002 7:39:34 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
If it hasn't occurred to you that there may not be such a thing as ADD, maybe you are not as clever as you think you are.

Retired MD

24 posted on 05/22/2002 7:41:57 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GirlyGirl
In most cases, it is quite the opposite. These kids, including my son, are very intelligent. But schools don't want to accept that some children learn in different ways and have tried to forced a square peg into a round hole.
25 posted on 05/22/2002 7:42:09 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
There may or may not be such a thing, but then I live with a child who has attentional problems and has since he was in 1st grade. So whatever you want to call it, it is a problem.
26 posted on 05/22/2002 7:43:38 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Trust but Verify
I really feel for you, and admire your efforts to persevere. As I said in an earlier post, I have no doubts that some children have this disorder.

My own views on ADD kids are clouded by experiences with two brothers in my son's Cub Scout pack. They are "special cases" who came to us with many excuses and instructions from their mother. The boys' father works out of town, and has face-to-face involvement with the boys on the weekends.

When their mother is present, the boys are holy terrors, and she screeches at them constantly. When the mother is occupied away from the boys, and the leader exerts gentle pressure and non-tolerance for continual disruptions, suddenly their behavior improves dramatically.

No, I'm not a doctor. But my layman's diagnosis is that they need more discipline, and their problems are behavioral, and not medical.

28 posted on 05/22/2002 7:48:31 AM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: VRWC_minion;Lance Romance;all
As an adult with ADD my IQ is a bit over the stupid range and as a CPA my performance is a tad above average.

I am also an adult with ADD, and I can assure all FReepers I am extremely intelligent. My 26 year-old son also has ADD and graduated maxima cum laude from a very good university with a degree in finance. After taking just one accounting class in college, scored a 366 out of 400 on the CPA exam, already has his CFP, and will have his MBA by next spring. And, by the way, was recently a speaker at a very large national financial planning conference a month or so ago.

Those people who only have ADD are generally very intelligent and once they set thier mind on a goal, they never, ever quit. We also have a great sense of humor' and we also tend to not be very tolerant with people suffering from terminatal stupidity.

30 posted on 05/22/2002 7:49:04 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
ADD and ADHD are misdiagnosed to a high degree. In fact, a lot of medical authorities are questioning the legitmacy of this 'illness' entirely. Except for the drug companies and the doctors and schools that are in their sway, there is a LOT of evidence that ADD and ADHD are not illnesses at all, but rather a 'catch-all' (and convenient) disease with which to avoid the hard work of taming unruly and hyperactive children. I suggest you take a look at the following book.

http://www.outlookcities.com/children/

http://www.thomasarmstrong.com/articles/add_myth.htm

31 posted on 05/22/2002 7:52:44 AM PDT by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
The use of Ritalin has drawn attention to quite a few factors: 1) Attention Deficit Disorder usually occurs when one of the biological parents was a drug addict when the child was conceived. My first question to the parents who have a child on Ritalin would be, "Which of you was the addict?" 2) When children ingest Ritalin over a number of years, their brains start to shrink at about the age of 20. 3) More boys than girls are on Ritalin, because teachers are not allowed to insist on well-mannered behavior in our classrooms. Therefore, the boys are drugged so that they will act more like docile girls. 4) When a student is diagnosed as having ADD, the parents are eligible to receive disability payments for the child. 5)What have I forgotten?
32 posted on 05/22/2002 7:53:24 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
You nailed it Tonto! 75% of these cases are simple situations of a hysterical mother raising hysterical kids. I see it every day.

Hell, just go to a walmart and watch.

33 posted on 05/22/2002 7:54:19 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
Your kid doesn't have ADD, so the subject of this article doesn't really apply to your kid. Short-term memory isn't the same as an inability to pay attention or the ability to sit still for long periods of time.

If I were going through school these days (thank God I'm not), I would certainly have been diagnosed as an ADD kid: I was diagnosed as being hyperactive by the Univeristy of Washington when I was three years old. I somehow made it through school anyway (barely).

I thought the added subtitle was funny.

Tuor

34 posted on 05/22/2002 7:58:00 AM PDT by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: B. A. Conservative
If it hasn't occurred to you that there may not be such a thing as ADD, maybe you are not as clever as you think you are.

Actually yes I did. I initially thought it was all total bull $hit. I was convinced by my wife to have my daughter tested for learning disabilities when she was in second grade. Her reading was about a year behind the next slowest student and the special help she was getting all year wasn't working

One of the things they tested for was ADD using those subjective tests they give the teachers, parents etc. The interesting thing is the classroom teacher who filled it out thought the ADD was a waste of time but completed the questionaires anyways. The results of the scaling was that my daughter tested 3 standard deviations above the mean.

Even so, I was still unconvinced and still thought this was all a bunck of mumbo jumbo BS. But I relented and went along with a trail dosage of ritalin to see what happened. I felt that a few weeks to a month shouldn't hurt much and that I owed it to my daughter to put aside my bias and see what happened.

Here is what happened; In three weeks she went from being a year behind the next slowest student to being the top reader in the class. She is now 15 and a sophomoe in school, she mantains honors while she keeps a full schedule of extra-currucilar activities that include acting in 3 to 4 plays per year, singing in 3 choruses and cheerleading.

Her recent doctor suggested she try and see what would happen if she went off medication and my daughter was livid with her doctor. She knows by experience from the times she forgets her medication how hard school is and wasn't about to try and screw up her successful track record. She not only convinced her DR to drop the subject her DR prescribed some longer acting drugs.

As far as your medical degree and ability to diagnose, I personally hold MD's in low regard. You folks were taught that young children could not get asthma. This widely held belief among DR's could have caused th death of one of my children if it were not for my independent research.

36 posted on 05/22/2002 8:00:34 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kcrack
ADD is at least twice as common in boys as in girls; learning disabilities are equally common in both genders.

Except maybe in very extreme cases, I don't consider this to be a disease at all. Kid's *aren't supposed* to be stuck in school all day when they're that young. Kids are active and need to be allowed to run around *alot*.

I think we send kids to school while they are way too young. I honestly don't think they should be attending formal classes until they are at least seven years old. Until then, they should play and enjoy life while they can, while having some lessons and especially some chores to do, just not *too* many. Eventually, yes, they will need to be put into formal classroom instruction, but even then they should have lots of play time.

I just don't understand why people are suprised that boys don't take well to being cooped up all day long. Get them away from computers, video games, and classrooms, and onto the playgrounds and fields.

Tuor

37 posted on 05/22/2002 8:05:56 AM PDT by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog;VRWC_minion
Funny, they will put adults in jail for using drugs anf threaten to take away their kids if they don't give them grugs. Hmmmmmmm.

I asked my doctor why ADD medications are catergorized as a Class-B narcotic. He told me that thr 60 mg of Adderall I take each day is enough to keep 5-10 'normal people' wired all day. The brain chemistry of people with ADD is different than those who do not have ADD. The fact that people with ADD are not 'wired' is evidence that ADD does indeed exist.

Most people do not realize that there are some advantages to having ADD, when not complicated by other factors. People with ADD are excelent performers in situations requiring quick thinking and analyzing a great deal of information immediately and making a good decision in a hurry. Good careers for people with ADD are sales, emergency service work such as firefighters, police, emergency medical type careers, pilots, trial lawyers, and really most careers that offer variety in work activities.

If you are in a situation where everyone is running around with their heads cut off, the calm guy in the middle of the storm who comes up with a solution to the situation could very well have ADD. Something else that people don't realize about those of us who have ADD is that we are able to 'hyperfocus' in situations where there is a need or an interest. The distraction part of ADD can also be a plus because we notice things going on around us that may be very important which escape the attention of 'normal people'.

Athletes who seem to perform extremely well on a consistent basis, especially in imortant events may very well have ADD. When others 'tighten up' in big games or in front of large noisy crowds, an ADDer would likely not even notice it because they are so focused.

And Orangedog, just for your information; When a person with ADD decides to take on a task or challenge, you can normally take it to the bank that they will accomplish that goal, because they will never, ever give up. That's good if they are on your side, but if you go against them, you will be in for the battle of your life. All you have to do to confirm this is to look at the posts of those with ADD on this thread who will not let misinformed uneducated idiots like you get away with your stereotypical garbage about ADD.

BTW, ADDers do not generally use a lot of 'tact', especially in the face of stupidity. Honest ignorance about ADD is O.K., because ignorance is curable through education, but obstinent stupidity is terminate and deserves no mercy.

You would be surprised at the number of Freepers that have ADD. Some of them are amonst the most popular, articulate, and VERY FUNNY posters on FR. I would even speculate that ADD amongst FReepers would be noticably higher than the general population. A reason for this possibility is that people with ADD tend to become really involved in those activities they choose. Many of the careers that Freepers have tend to attract thos with ADD. Lets face it, Freepers and ADDers are not nearly as likely to have careers where they punch a clock every day or have routine, boring jobs.

38 posted on 05/22/2002 8:37:33 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
Ooooh Ooooh. Sign me up for ADD.
39 posted on 05/22/2002 8:44:53 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: *education News
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
40 posted on 05/22/2002 9:02:34 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: abclily
The use of Ritalin has drawn attention to quite a few factors: 1) Attention Deficit Disorder usually occurs when one of the biological parents was a drug addict when the child was conceived. My first question to the parents who have a child on Ritalin would be, "Which of you was the addict?"

The source of this information is...? Drug usage of the biologial mother may very well result in damage to her child and if that is the case, it is not ADD that is the problem, it would most likely be directly related to the drugs/alcohol used by the mother. These are the children who may be diagnosed with ADD/ADHD who do not have it at all. Certainly an actual case where ADD does exist when complicated by other factors does make diagnosis and treatment much more difficult. The problem is not the ADD/ADHD, but the other 'factors'.

2) When children ingest Ritalin over a number of years, their brains start to shrink at about the age of 20.

The source of your 'evidence'?

3) More boys than girls are on Ritalin, because teachers are not allowed to insist on well-mannered behavior in our classrooms. Therefore, the boys are drugged so that they will act more like docile girls.

This is a real indication of your ignorance about ADD/ADHD. If a child who does not have ADD/ADHD is given medication for ADD/ADHD they would really become hyperactive, disruptive and an even bigger 'terror' to the teacher. ADD medications are stimulants, some of which are class-B narcotics. If a non-ADD/ADHD person were to take ADD/ADHD medications, the last thing they would be is 'more docile'.

These may be things of which you were unaware. While I agree that ADD/ADHD might be overdiagnosis, it is quite another to say it doesn't exist. You also seem to imply that people with ADD/ADHD cannot perform well. I know several people with ADD who have graduated from college with excellent grades, many of whom hardly ever studied because they were able to 'just remember' the important stuff when listening in class or reading the material once or twice.

41 posted on 05/22/2002 9:07:10 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
I have just diagnosised you with a case of terminal stupidity. If you wish to redeem yourself and provide some evidence that you are not suffering from terminal stupidity on this subject, please answer the following questions:

If ADD/ADHD does not exist, how could the giving of a stimulant to a child make them 'more docile' or 'manageable'? Wouldn't you expect just the opposite?

If you have no reasonable explanation and are at least willing to recognize that maybe your earlier opinions might need to be re-evaluated, I would graciously withdraw my diagnosis of terminal stupidity.

42 posted on 05/22/2002 9:19:27 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Stupid Kid Alert? My daughter was diagnosed with ADHD and has an IQ of 124. Not a rocket scientist to be sure but not stupid either.

What I discovered as her mother in the years of dealing with the school system (pure hell) is an amazing degree of ignorance from so-called professionals (our school district was particularly bad).

Initially I was stunned to hear from teachers about behavior problems at school I had never seen at home. By 5th grade I was stunned to hear from her teacher that year that she "loved having children" like my daughter in her classroom because they challenged her. During that year my daughter bloomed, displaying a gift for writing that surprised us all.

After that year, my daughter's ADHD returned, life became hell again (I think I got to the point where I dreaded school more than she did). She did however go on to win 1st prize in a poster contest that involved thousands of kids, a science award, and a scholarship to a summer program at a college.

For the most part it was clear that her teachers would rather she weren't around, I used to wonder how well I would have fared in similar circumstances.

I think ADHD is a catch all diagnosis and professionals need to be more careful in how they apply it.

Something else to consider in this discussion is the schools. We all know that we are not doing a good job educating our children and it is possible that at least some of these behavior problems have their source in a badly flawed school system.
43 posted on 05/22/2002 9:22:09 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
"You folks were taught that young children could not get asthma. This widely held belief among DR's could have caused th death of one of my children if it were not for my independent research."

You are misinformed. Physicians as a group are not taught that young children can not get asthma. I don't doubt that you may have anecdotal data to support your misinformation, but this generality is simply not true.

To some extent your castigation of physicians as a group is also misplaced. The quality of medicine practiced in this country has declined over the last thirty years, but the fault does not lie with the profession. The blame almost exclusively belongs at the feet of government and government regulators. Government assumed responsiblity for the quality of medical care during the early 70's by stripping that responsibility from the physicians, the only group qualified to police physicians. I will be glad to debate anyone about who is competent to police physicians. I will be glad to debate anyone about the competence of government to police anything. No group has ever demonstrated such overwhelming incompetence as well as government.

44 posted on 05/22/2002 9:22:18 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
If you can focus long enough on my reply, I will tell you to KMA.

All the wonderful accomplishments you attributed to someone with ADD seem to have the symptoms of someone without ADD. Your theories are starting to head down the "Global Warming" path. i.e. it's cold because of global warming. What a crock.

45 posted on 05/22/2002 9:25:13 AM PDT by Lance Romance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lance Romance
Bump for later...
46 posted on 05/22/2002 9:28:25 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
According to my son's lung specialist, DR's were routinely taught that children under one year could not have asthma. This was his explanation to me why, after taking our son to three different doctors regarding his cough variant asthma that none of them could see beyond prescribing anti-biotics (which had the potential of doing more damage than good). Even after my repeated attempts in telling each DR' they were missing because its not normal for children to turn blue from coughing. They all took on their cock-sure we know everything attitude similar to your use of Md to support your otherwise unsupportable posistion.

I would applaud doctors if they acted a lot more humble about what they think the know. The other attitude can cause deaths.

47 posted on 05/22/2002 9:39:32 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
There has never been a shortage of the inexperienced willing to follow the pied piper. Your name implies good standards, but your verification and that of VWRC_minion is anecdotal analysis with Alice-like qualities. It is very difficult to scientifically evaluate medical trials. Confusion can prevail for years with many contradictory results. Never underestimate the power of placebos and witchcraft.

My daughter is a believer in ADD and potentially poisons my grand daughter on a daily basis as part of a giant poorly controlled experiment. I don't mind you putting your children at risk betting on the outcome of an experiment, but I resent what my daughter is doing immensely. Judgment is acquired over time through experience. Wisdom is proper use of judgment combined with experience. Faith is the acceptance of theory without proof. Unfortunately, it is not the kids who are stupid, but the same can not be said for the parents.

There is no medical proof that ADHD exists. There is also no proof that drugs are of benefit. Faith is not a substitute for science.

Before citing religion and faith in God to me, please take the time to read Julian Jaynes's Book. But be aware, that it may challenge your faith. I don't know, but am fairly certain that Jaynes is correct. Man invented God, not the other way around.

48 posted on 05/22/2002 9:41:09 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Link

In children, asthma may be diagnosed at age 3 or younger. In infants, asthma may be the aftermath of flu, a cold, or virus infection. Bronchiolitis (a viral inflammation of the small airways that occurs in young children during the cold months) is sometimes followed by asthma, and the symptoms of asthma resemble those of the viral infection. Although wheezing represents the hallmark of asthma, this breathing problem can also be caused by other respiratory disorders, so most physicians do not diagnose asthma until they carefully examine a child and note more than two asthma episodes.

49 posted on 05/22/2002 9:47:52 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
An important addition to EPR-2 is a discussion of the management of asthma in infants and young children that incorporates recent studies on wheezing in early childhood. Another addition is discussions of long-term-control medications that have become available since 1991—long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists, nedocromil, zafirlukast, and zileuton.
50 posted on 05/22/2002 9:52:04 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson